Recs

1

1 Reason Southern Copper's Earnings Aren't So Hot

It takes money to make money. Most investors know that, but with business media so focused on the "how much," very few investors bother to ask, "How fast?"

When judging a company's prospects, how quickly it turns cash outflows into cash inflows can be just as important as how much profit it's booking in the accounting fantasy world we call "earnings." This is one of the first metrics I check when I'm hunting for the market's best stocks. Today, we'll see how it applies to Southern Copper (NYSE: SCCO  ) .

Let's break this down
In this series, we measure how swiftly a company turns cash into goods or services and back into cash. We'll use a quick, relatively foolproof tool known as the cash conversion cycle, or CCC for short.

Why does the CCC matter? The less time it takes a firm to convert outgoing cash into incoming cash, the more powerful and flexible its profit engine is. The less money tied up in inventory and accounts receivable, the more available to grow the company, pay investors, or both.

To calculate the cash conversion cycle, add days inventory outstanding to days sales outstanding, then subtract days payable outstanding. Like golf, the lower your score here, the better.

Here's the CCC for Southern Copper, alongside the comparable figures from a few competitors and peers.

Company

TTM Revenue

TTM CCC

 Southern Copper $6,648  71
 BHP Billiton Limited (NYSE: BHP  ) $72,065  40
 BHP Billiton plc (NYSE: BBL  ) $72,065  40
 Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold (NYSE: FCX  ) $22,321  66

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. Data is current as of last fully reported fiscal quarter. TTM = trailing 12 months.

For younger, fast-growth companies, the CCC can give you valuable insight into the sustainability of that growth. A company that's taking longer to make cash may need to tap financing to keep its momentum. For older, mature companies, the CCC can tell you how well the company is managed. Firms that begin to lose control of the CCC may be losing their clout with their suppliers (who might be demanding stricter payment terms) and customers (who might be demanding more generous terms). This can sometimes be an important signal of future distress -- one most investors are likely to miss.

While I find peer comparisons useful, I'm most interested in comparing a company's CCC to its prior performance. Here's where I believe all investors need to become trend-watchers. Sure, there may be legitimate reasons for an increase in the CCC, but all things being equal, I want to see this number stay steady or move downward over time.

anImage

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. FY = fiscal year. TTM = trailing 12 months.

Because of the seasonality in some businesses, the CCC for the TTM period may not be strictly comparable to the fiscal-year periods shown in the chart. Even the steadiest-looking businesses on an annual basis will experience some quarterly fluctuations in the CCC. To get an understanding of the usual ebb and flow at Southern Copper, consult the quarterly period chart below.

anImage

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. FQ = fiscal quarter.

On a 12-month basis, the trend at Southern Copper looks less than great. At 70.7 days, it is 21.4 days worse than the five-year average of 49.3 days. The biggest contributor to that degradation was DPO, which worsened 22.5 days when compared to the five-year average.

Considering the numbers on a quarterly basis, the CCC trend at Southern Copper looks OK. At 80.4 days, it is 17.3 days worse than the average of the past eight quarters. Investors will want to keep an eye on this for the future to make sure it doesn't stray too far in the wrong direction. With both 12-month and quarterly CCC running worse than average, Southern Copper gets low marks in this cash-conversion checkup.

Though the CCC can take a little work to calculate, it's definitely worth watching every quarter. You'll be better informed about potential problems, and you'll improve your odds of finding the underappreciated home run stocks that provide the market's best returns.

To stay on top of the CCC for your favorite companies, just use the handy links below to add companies to your free watchlist.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Seth Jayson had no position in any company mentioned here at the time of publication. You can view his stock holdings here. He is co-advisor of Motley Fool Hidden Gems, which provides new small-cap ideas every month, backed by a real-money portfolio. The Motley Fool owns shares of Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

 


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 09, 2011, at 1:34 PM, 0b1knob wrote:

    Another problem with SCCO is the limited life span of mines. Lower quality ore in their primary mine is already pushing their costs higher. The mines will eventually be depleted although that may take several decades.

    Any dividends from mining companies are a return of capital to some extent, even if they aren't treated as such by the IRS.

  • Report this Comment On November 09, 2011, at 6:00 PM, IdaAg wrote:

    To: ob1knob

    I guess you can say the same thing for all of the oil and gas companies. It doesn't seem to me like Exxon is hurting though. The thing that will balance out the loss of production is that new mines will be brought online or if they are truly running out of product the price of the commodity will rise to cover the costs. The only bad thing is if SCCO is the only one running out of the commodity while other miners are continuing to produce.

  • Report this Comment On November 09, 2011, at 8:51 PM, Gilseki2U wrote:

    I've been in and out of Southern Copper for many years and have never lost as much as a penny. Why? Because unlike the much touted Freeport McMoran, they return a large portion of their earnings to investors and... somehow, they manage to still make money AND increase their dividend payout. I last bought at $25.00 a share when everyone and I mean EVERYONE said copper was headed into the toilet; Chinese supply was excess and demand was headed south. That means... at current payout ratio I'm receiving an 11.2% dividend. Ten years ago, when I first sold off Peru Copper, I was receiving appox. an 18% dividend... but that's another story. Anyhoo,

    Seth you are losing credibility... I notice that FCX's CCC is about the same as SCCO but the difference seems to be that TMF likes FCX. I think I'll stick with a proven payer of big dividends. Fool On!

  • Report this Comment On November 09, 2011, at 9:12 PM, Gilseki2U wrote:

    Oh... one last thing... I subscribe to six TMF newsletters but reluctantly dropped Hidden Gems a couple of years ago. Nothing personal Seth, but would love to hear your take on COOL, which still seems to be under your radar. I have been picking this "Gem" up between $2 and $2.50 for awhile now (Last purchase was the end of

    Sept 2011), but have yet to read a TMF analysis on it.

    P.S. to IdaAg - SCCO is not in any danger of depleting their mines during my lifetime and unless they're lying, they report finding new sources of high quality ore. Incidentally, I read the entire transcript of the recent stockholder's lawsuit decision that went against Grupo de Mexico. They say they'll appeal, but the ramifications bode well for stock holders.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1586611, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 8:16:50 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 23 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:03 PM
SCCO $28.79 Down -0.20 -0.69%
Southern Copper Co… CAPS Rating: ****
FCX $32.41 Down -0.16 -0.49%
Freeport-McMoRan C… CAPS Rating: ****
BHP $61.81 Down -0.99 -1.58%
BHP Billiton Limit… CAPS Rating: ****
BBL $53.22 Down -0.73 -1.35%
BHP Billiton plc (… CAPS Rating: *****

Advertisement