Recs

125

1 Monster Dividend

How would you like to emulate Warren Buffett the old-school way? I'll reveal a stock where you could do just that and perhaps double your money, too.

In his earlier years Buffett used to take advantage of undiscovered stocks paying huge dividends and ride them to capital gains.

In Warren Buffett and the Art of Stock Arbitrage, Mary Buffett explains how the superinvestor exploited opportunities in master limited partnerships and royalty trusts:

After the company announces that it is going to convert into either a royalty trust or a master limited partnership, which means that its future dividend payout will increase after the conversion, the stock market won't recognize the increase until the conversion is completed and the dividend is actually increased and paid out. This creates a short period of time, between the announced reorganization and the actual date of the conversion, in which the company's shares are undervalued in relation to their future increase in value, due to the increase in the dividend payout that occurs after the conversion.

Why does this window of market inefficiency exist? These companies, because of their small market cap, are usually not well followed by Wall Street or the general public.

So the basic principle is to buy a stock that's bumped its dividend or is about to, before the market can realize and react. And if it's a small company, all the better. That's the approach I recommended back in April for CVR Partners (NYSE: UAN  ) , which moved from $18 to nearly $28 per unit. The stock now yields a sizeable 8.3% at its estimated annual payout of $1.92.

And now I'm back with another stock that pays out a whopping 12% yield that could drive shares higher.

All aboard
Although it's not a trust or MLP, the company fits the profile laid out above. Just this week it announced that it doubled its quarterly payout. The company has a tiny market cap, about $165 million, meaning few follow it. In fact, on the recent conference call, just one analyst asked questions. Plus, you won't see this dividend increase reflected on most finance websites or with your broker either. That's why this is such a special situation.

That company is Box Ships (NYSE: TEU  ) .

The company was spun off from Paragon Shipping (NYSE: PRGN  ) back in April via an IPO. After a few vessel acquisitions, Box Ships now operates a fleet of seven containerships that transport goods across the globe. Containerships carry some 90% of the world's dry cargo, and Box's fleet is among the youngest, with an average age of just 39 months.

It focuses on medium-size ships (from sub-Panamax to post-Panamax), since there's a lack of supply in that space coming online in future years. The company's strategy is to sign its ships to medium-length charters in order to capture rising containership rates. Currently, the fleet is chartered out for an average of 30 months, so there's some cash flow stability in the business. And for 2012, the company already has 93% of revenue days secured.

Stormy seas
Charter rates have been rough over the last six months or so, with rates being sliced in half and well below their 10-year average. But what matters for Box is what happens when it comes time to charter two vessels -- two that produce the lowest revenue -- whose contracts expire in August 2012. Management expects rates to pick up in early 2012, as supply comes into more balance with demand.

In fact, conditions look good in the containership market longer term, with demand expected to outstrip supply until at least 2015. That should be good news for shipping rates.

Don't get this market confused with dry bulk shippers, where oversupply has crippled the industry. There, shippers such Dry Ships (Nasdaq: DRYS  ) , Diana Shipping (NYSE: DSX  ) , and Frontline (NYSE: FRO  ) have been hurting for several years, and once-generous dividends have dried up faster than a California raisin in Death Valley. Navios Maritime (NYSE: NM  ) is one of the few that has managed to maintain a dividend somewhere close to its payout of a few years ago. In contrast, the containership market looks much stronger.

The dividend
In its most recent quarter, the company earned $0.32 per share, a number that should be fairly stable given its chartered ships. So its dividend of $0.30 per share is high for a normal company, but it's not outrageous for a shipper. Because growth capital expenditure is so high for shippers, it's necessary to raise capital via debt or equity offerings anyway, so it can make sense to pay out all profits to shareholders. The company has promised a $0.30 dividend for the fourth quarter, too.

With the downturn in charter rates, the company is looking for opportunities to acquire other vessels at attractive prices. On the conference call, CEO Michael Bodouroglou promised that Box would look for only accretive acquisitions that could boost the dividend. With the company's moderate leverage (for a shipper) of 52% of net debt/total capitalization, it should be able to issue more debt and not dilute equity holders.

With a contracted fleet of ships, we should have some confidence in the company maintaining its high payout. So with a dividend of annualized $1.20 per share, how high could Box sail?

Expected Dividend Yield

Capital Gain

10% 17%
9% 30%
8% 46%
7% 67%
6% 95%

An expected yield of 6%-8% would be in line with some of its larger peers such as Costamare and Seaspan, meaning the stock might gain somewhere between 46% and 95% from its current price.

Risks
As with any investment, there are risks to Box. Paragon still owns about 21% of the company from the spinoff IPO, and the CEO owns 18% of Paragon and 11% of Box as well. Bodouroglou is also the CEO of Paragon. Also of concern is that Bodouroglou owns the management company to which Box Ships pays a management fee based on daily charter rates. Yes, it's a cozy relationship that bears some watching to see if management is self-dealing.

Another threat to the company is the fragile world economy. Container shipping has been on a decades-long upswing, but as we saw in 2008-2009, a global economic decline could really hurt the industry. And any type of supply buildout like we've seen among dry bulk shippers would wreak havoc on charter rates.

Foolish bottom line
Buffett loved special situations investing, but given its risks, Box Ships might not be for everyone. There are plenty of other great dividends out there, and you'll find 11 dividend dynamos in a brand-new free report from Motley Fool expert analysts, called "Secure Your Future With 11 Rock-Solid Dividend Stocks." Today I invite you to download it at no cost to you. To get instant access to the names of these 11 high yielders, simply click here -- it's free.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Jim Royal, Ph.D., owns shares of Seaspan. The Motley Fool owns shares of Box Ships and Seaspan. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended creating a write covered straddle position in Seaspan. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 17, 2011, at 3:07 PM, shamapant wrote:

    See Teacherman1's articles on this for lots of goodies. I personally prefer his pick, DCIX, over TEU due to TEU's bad management record and DCIX's cleaner balance sheet, but both are stellar opportunities. I love your posts as usual, *Rec Jim Royal*

  • Report this Comment On November 17, 2011, at 3:09 PM, TMFRoyal wrote:

    Thanks, Shamapant. I'll have a look. We might be able to do the same thing at DCIX.

    Jim

  • Report this Comment On November 17, 2011, at 5:28 PM, jones757 wrote:

    The statment, "demand expected to outstrip supply until at least 2015" is simply not true.

    Containership capacity is at an all time high. Liner carriers are carrying out fleet raitonalization on a regular basis to keep market rates in check.

    I would not be surprised to see another round of vessel lay-ups if the Eurozone economy goes into a deep recession. The Asia to Europe trade is the #1 source of revenue for container carriers.

    Just food for thought.

  • Report this Comment On November 17, 2011, at 5:35 PM, TMFRoyal wrote:

    Hi, jones757,

    I pulled that from p 14 of the recent earnings presentation. The source of the data/research is Maersk Broker Research.

    Jim

  • Report this Comment On November 17, 2011, at 5:36 PM, TMFRoyal wrote:

    And by "that", I mean "demand expected to outstrip supply until at least 2015"

    Jim

  • Report this Comment On November 17, 2011, at 5:36 PM, Bsorge10 wrote:

    Take it from someone who was a chartering manager for a 20 ship fleet of Drybulk carriers ranging from 16,000 to 65,000 dwt. This buiness is very tough and those who are successful are putting their ships on long term charters or have a long term contract to carry cargo. A 30 month time charter is over in the blink of an eye and then you have to play the pot market. Only Navios has survived since the 1960's. In short I would consider this investment as highly speculative and old not invest.

    This is not one of those investments that you can judge from a balance sheet.

  • Report this Comment On November 17, 2011, at 5:46 PM, kfur wrote:

    This has now happened on a couple fool postings. You talk about monster dividends and yet when I look it up today was the ex date. Do you think that maybe this post could have happened yesterday or maybe last week? Am I missing something here or is this article intended to irritate people.

  • Report this Comment On November 17, 2011, at 5:57 PM, shamapant wrote:

    kfur, i believe the intent of his article was to realize capital appreciation when the market readjusted TEU's value for its dividend yield. The actual 3% dividend isn't that much of a monster on its own...the monster is the appreciation

  • Report this Comment On November 17, 2011, at 5:59 PM, sheldonross wrote:

    Yay a company run by the guy who runs Paragon. How's that doing? Lost 75% YTD? Now trades at 80 cents? Suspended their dividend several months ago? The CEO has been described as a crook and swindler?

    Count me in!

  • Report this Comment On November 17, 2011, at 6:00 PM, shamapant wrote:

    would you look at that...ex-dividend and its already up 8.75% after hours...keep watching though, after earnings were released it was at 11.04 after hours and it grounded back again.

  • Report this Comment On November 17, 2011, at 6:11 PM, NerfBall wrote:

    Personally, I'm more interested in the owners and lessors of the containers themselves, rather than the ships that carry them, and especially if TEU has any connection to the Greek shippers, which I would not touch with a ten foot pole due to concerns over their extremely sketchy and often incestuous way of going about business, and often questionable accounting practices. And on that note, Jim- what do you think of TAL? I find it quite compelling, a moneymaking owner and lessor of box containers that happens to pay an extremely generous dividend? It's very lightly traded and followed, and as a result flies somewhat under the radar, so I'd be curious to hear your thoughts on TAL, if you'd care to comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 17, 2011, at 6:39 PM, Teacherman1 wrote:

    shamapant - What do you think? Is this a good price for DCIX? :)

    Bsorge - You are correct, the shipping business is very "fluid" and can change quickly. That is why I stated several times that this was a good 2 to 3 year investment, but after that, it was anybody's guess.

    jones757 - You are correct that an oversuppy in the containership business is developing, as recently stated by the management of Maersk, but not all containerships are "created equal", size and where and how they are utilized matters. Having said that, I repeat, after 2 to 3 years, it could be a whole new ballgame with both of these companies.

    kfur - There were plenty of blogs about this company well before the ex-dividend date. Sorry if you missed them.

    sheldonross - If your problem with TEU has primarily to do with the management, I can understand that. I would like to point out though that it is in the interest of the PRGN/TEU managemnt to not "kill this golden goose", since PRGN will be receiving about $4M a year in dividends from TEU, and the "top dog at both" will be receiving about $2M a year in dividends from TEU. Of course, I understand that if you just don't feel comfortable with the management, then stay away. How do you feel about the management of DSX. If you like them, then take a look at DCIX.

    TMFRoyal - I say this "tongue in cheek", what took you so long to find them? :)

    I say to all, do what you feel comfortable with. I am long on both TEU and DCIX and expect to be for at least the next 2-3 years.

    Hope we all have a better Friday, that what we had today.

  • Report this Comment On November 17, 2011, at 7:15 PM, shamapant wrote:

    Teacherman1-Its definitely cheap for the obvious valuation reasons you have provided previously, dividend yield, cash value, book value...whatever you look at it. I love it. I personally plan on getting out as soon as the capital appreciation occurs, be that tomorrow or in 3 years, but if its sooner, then I won't stay in for the dividends. My eyes have been opened to the special situation world and I have been finding some wonderful payouts elsewhere that may be a better place to put my money(i blogged about some Contingent Value rights, and then I think TMF Royal found PRIS.B has a huge wonderful dividend that I am looking into).

    Shamapant

  • Report this Comment On November 17, 2011, at 8:40 PM, gkirkmf wrote:

    Today was ugly...

    Bsorge - Been looking a International Shipholding Corp ISH:NYSE. You seem very knowledgeable on shipping companies. What do you thing of them?

  • Report this Comment On November 18, 2011, at 4:09 AM, Stoneaa wrote:

    Monster Dividend? Here is a sheet of stocks with a market capitalization of more than USD 2 billion as well as a dividend yield of more than 10 percent. 12 stocks and one fund fulfilled these criteria of which 4 are large capitalized with a market capitalization above USD 10 billion.

    + http://bit.ly/t5ezMI +

    The average price to earnings ratio (P/E ratio) amounts to 10.9 while the forward price to earnings ratio is 9.7. The dividend yield has a value of 13.4 percent. Price to book ratio is 1.8 and price to sales ratio 2.7. The operating margin amounts to 14.7 percent.

  • Report this Comment On November 25, 2011, at 12:00 PM, post1958 wrote:

    Current maturities of debt = 17.7 mil.

    Dividend seems unsustainable relative to debt service requirements and earnings

  • Report this Comment On November 25, 2011, at 12:37 PM, wohl62 wrote:

    I probably "misssed" something back when Paragon "unloaded' (spun off) Box Ships but, I believe, before that spin-off, Paragon was paying a large dividend. If that was the case, wouldn't a holder of Paragon be "distressed" to find out that, now, Box Ships is the one paqying out the large dividend and Paragon may not be?

  • Report this Comment On November 25, 2011, at 2:13 PM, maniladad wrote:

    I read from a comment that Michael Bordouroglou sold out his shares of Paragon before it spun off Box Ships. I tried to confirm this by going to the SEC records of the two companies, Paragon Shipping (PRGN) and Box Ships (TEU). The first thing that struck me is that there are a huge number of entries to wade through, far more than usual. Perhaps this is in part because Mr. Bordouroglou is a Greek citizen. Some of these were correspondence from the SEC advising Box Ships/Paragon that certain statements about legal advice on tax matters did not protect the companies from penalties for violating regulations.

    TEU is organized in the Republic of the Marshall Islands (?!). Both PRGN and TEU have their business offices in Athens as does their management consultant, which I am guessing a bit is XRTC Business Consultants Ltd, whose managing director is also a director of Paragon Shipping. Michael Bordouroglou is the Chairman, President and CEO of both companies as apparently the co-owner of the management firm as well. TEU was formed by the acquisition of 6 ships, 3 of which were bought from PRGN for 'a specified cash amount' which was not specified in the SEC statement, and a total of about 2,430,000 shares of TEU, about 21.3% of the 13,266,600 total TEU shares. In addition Mr. Bordouroglou owns 114,000 shares, 11% of the total. (Seems to me that there's a few zeros missing from the number of shares that would constitute 11%; maybe I made a mistake somewhere.) Back to the ships, 2 were bought and then sold to TEU by the management company of which Michael Borgdouroglou is reportedly a co-owner. And finally one ship was bought from Proplous Navigation, which is owned by (guess who?) Michael Borgouroglou. I never found any documentation about the cost of acquisition of the ships for TEU.

    In another SEC filing I found "Paragon retains the right to effect transactions that would change the number of Common Shares" of TEU.

    I never found anything that confirmed or denied that Mr. Bordourdoglou sold out his PRGN stocks before the spin off of TEU and subsequent decline of PRGN stocks. I ran out of time at this point but it was already clear to me that this was not a stock that I wanted to own. The high dividend seems to me to be bait to lure unsuspecting investors into a trap. Either somebody left the Limburger out in the sun or something about this arrangement stinks.

  • Report this Comment On November 25, 2011, at 2:31 PM, DJDynamicNC wrote:

    ^^ That was a great comment, thank you for that. Good analysis.

  • Report this Comment On November 25, 2011, at 3:07 PM, Bsorge10 wrote:

    Gkirkmf,

    Sorry to be so late to reply. I know nothing about IHS, but do know Overseas shipbuilding which was a good Company. Right now I dislike anything in the shipping sector that does not have long term charters. Those that play the spot market eventually die!

  • Report this Comment On November 25, 2011, at 5:40 PM, wisestfool wrote:

    I believe that Motley should mention that this dividend could well be short-lived, and that was not clearly explained. Motley Fool should be ashamed of itself. Only a "fool" should invest in this company without thorough investigation.

  • Report this Comment On November 27, 2011, at 8:01 AM, TimoDOZ wrote:

    Good luck in this asset class space! Look at what has gone on at SFL and the overhang they have gotten from HRZ now HRZN.pk and now the latest disaster with who ever it is. look at that chart of SFL since march. It did not even wait for sell in May. Ocean freight no matter whether in dry bulk, LNG, Box ships, or even standard tankers are all suffering from over capacity and a slow to slowing global economy.

  • Report this Comment On November 28, 2011, at 8:46 AM, TimoDOZ wrote:

    Sorry for the wrong quote off the pinks of an SFL overhang. Horizon is now HRZL.PK and the latestest disaster is of course (FRO).

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1591341, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 11:49:44 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:06 PM
TEU $7.37 Up +0.08 +1.10%
Box Ships CAPS Rating: *****
NM $3.48 Up +0.14 +4.19%
Navios Maritime Ho… CAPS Rating: *****
PRGN $0.58 Up +0.00 +0.83%
Paragon Shipping I… CAPS Rating: ****
UAN $21.50 Down -0.02 -0.09%
CVR Partners, LP CAPS Rating: *****
DRYS $2.29 Up +0.04 +1.78%
DryShips, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
DSX $8.25 Up +0.27 +3.38%
Diana Shipping, In… CAPS Rating: *****
FRO $5.38 Up +0.40 +8.03%
Frontline Ltd. (US… CAPS Rating: ***

Advertisement