Recs

0

Does Mohawk Industries Pass Buffett's Test?

We'd all like to invest like the legendary Warren Buffett, turning thousands into millions or more. Buffett analyzes companies by calculating return on invested capital, or ROIC, in order to help determine whether a company has an economic moat -- the ability to earn returns on its money above that money's cost.

ROIC is perhaps the most important metric in value investing. By determining a company's ROIC, you can see how well it's using the cash you entrust to it and whether it's actually creating value for you. Simply, it divides a company's operating profit by how much investment it took to get that profit. The formula is:

ROIC = Net operating profit after taxes / Invested capital

The nuances of the formula are explained in further detail here. This one-size-fits-all calculation cuts out many of the legal accounting tricks (such as excessive debt) that managers use to boost earnings numbers, and provides you with an apples-to-apples way to evaluate businesses, even across industries. The higher the ROIC, the more efficient the company uses capital.

Ultimately, we're looking for companies that can invest their money at rates that are higher than the cost of capital, which for most businesses is between 8% and 12%. Ideally, we want to see ROIC above 12%, at a minimum, and a history of increasing returns, or at least steady returns, which indicate some durability to the company's economic moat.

Let's take a look at Mohawk Industries (NYSE: MHK  ) and three of its industry peers, to see how efficiently they use cash. Here are the ROIC figures for each company over a few periods.

Company

TTM

1 year ago

3 years ago

5 years ago

Mohawk Industries 5.4%* 4.3% 6.3%* 7.4%
Armstrong World Industries (NYSE: AWI  ) 5.4% 1.7% 3.2% 3.6%
Knoll (NYSE: KNL  ) 12.6% 9.1% 19.6% 14.5%
Herman Miller (Nasdaq: MLHR  ) 25.2% 14.5% 48.8% 36.9%

Source: S&P Capital IQ.* Because MHK did not report an effective tax rate, we used its 33.6% rate from 5 years ago.

Mohawk Industries has lower current returns on its invested capital than it did five years ago, as do two of the other listed companies, suggesting that its competitive position has weakened somewhat. Plus, its ROIC sits at a modest level. In contrast, Herman Miller managed to put a strong ROIC over the last four quarters.

Businesses with consistently high ROIC show that they're efficiently using capital. They also have the ability to treat shareholders well, because they can then use their extra cash to pay out dividends to us, buy back shares, or further invest in their franchise. And healthy and growing dividends are something that Warren Buffett has long loved.

So for more successful investments, dig a little deeper than the earnings headlines to find the company's ROIC. If you'd like to add these companies to your Watchlist, click below:

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Jim Royal, Ph.D., does not own shares of any company mentioned here. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 01, 2011, at 4:27 PM, AlanLee49 wrote:

    MHK has no clue as to protecting its premium brands in my opinion. Too many stores have exactly the same products within chipping distance, and the one brand name they did have, they have managed to dilute it nearly as much as the other products. management needs to learn some lessons in brand management in my opinion, otherwise the other manufacturers will pass them handily.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1629203, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 10:19:51 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:01 PM
MHK $69.66 Down -0.38 -0.54%
Mohawk Industries,… CAPS Rating: **
MLHR $18.36 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Herman Miller, Inc… CAPS Rating: *****
KNL $13.64 Down -0.02 -0.15%
Knoll, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
AWI $46.97 Up +0.33 +0.71%
Armstrong World In… CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement