Recs

4

This Just In: Upgrades and Downgrades

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

At The Motley Fool, we poke plenty of fun at Wall Street analysts and their endless cycle of upgrades, downgrades, and "initiating coverage at neutral." Today, we'll show you whether those bigwigs actually know what they're talking about. To help, we've enlisted Motley Fool CAPS to track the long-term performance of Wall Street's best and worst.

The perils of Peru
Peruvian stocks took a pounding yesterday, as the MSCI All Peru Capped Index (INDEX: EPU  ) lost 1.2% of its market cap. Individual stocks within the group, including Companhia de Minas Buenaventura (NYSE: BVN  ) , Austral Group SA, and Aceros Arequipa suffered even greater losses. Foreign firms (with significant Peruvian exposure) weren't spared, either. In particular, shareholders of Southern Copper (NYSE: SCCO  ) saw their shares shed more than 6% on fears that Europe's debt crisis will crimp demand for the shiny metal ... and a downgrade that seemed to confirm these fears.

On Tuesday, respected British banker Barclays announced it's throwing in the towel on Southern Copper, removing its equalweight rating on the stock and downgrading to underweight (i.e., "sell"). The reason: Street expectations for 13% long-term growth at the company seem "excessively optimistic." As ratings watcher StreetInsider reported yesterday, Barclays worries that Southern Copper faces "serious challenges to deliver volume growth" and "rising" project execution risks on its Peruvian operations in particular. The analyst points out that six years ago, Southern Copper was producing 690,000 tons of copper annually -- but is only expected to produce 606,000 tons in 2012.

With typical British understatement, Barclays suggests investors exercise "caution" on Street projections that Southern Copper will turn around and up its copper production to 1 million tons or more by 2016. Simply put -- that's not the way the trend is heading.

Numbers don't lie
Should you listen to Barclays? If you didn't, I can't say I'd blame you. Fact is, this analyst's record on metals and mining stock can most charitably be described as "mixed." (Less charitable observers might prefer the adjective "miserable.") Over the course of the three years we've been tracking Barclays on CAPS, the analyst has actually only gotten about 1 pick in 4 right in the mining industry. Even on Wall Street, that's pretty poor performance...

That said, I also see where Barclays is coming from when it pans Southern Copper -- and I can't say I even disagree with the assessment. At 10 times earnings, Southern Copper already sells for a steep premium to the single-digit valuations of rival copper miners such as Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE: FCX  ) , Vale (NYSE: VALE  ) , Rio Tinto (NYSE: RIO  ) , and even BHP Billiton (NYSE: BHP  ) . With so many cheaper names to choose from, I'm hard-pressed to find a reason to buy the more expensive stock in this sphere.

True, Southern Copper pays a superior dividend yield, and I suspect the 8.9% payout is what attracts a lot of income investors to the stock. But I do wonder how safe that dividend is.

Consider: At its current level of $2.80 per share, Southern Copper's forward dividend yield requires the company to pay out some $2.35 billion in dividends over the next 12 months. That's about $200 million more than the company currently collects in annual cash flow -- and that's not even counting the need to invest in capex. (Copper mining being, as you can imagine, a rather capital-intensive endeavor.)

Foolish takeaway
In short, it wouldn't surprise me a bit if Southern Copper finds itself forced to cut back on dividend payments in the year to come, an event that might eliminate the stock's major attraction for many investors. Failing that, Southern Copper would likely have to dig itself deeper into debt than it already is (i.e., about $1 billion in the hole). Or it could be forced to skimp on capital investments in an effort to keep shareholders happy. Or ... all of the above.

In short, anyway you look at it, the situation looks grim for Southern Copper. And Barclays is right to advise selling it.

Looking for a better way to strike gold in mining? You're in luck! We just happen to have finished up a new -- and free! – report: "The Tiny Gold Stock Digging Up Massive Profits." Read it for free right here.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

The Motley Fool owns shares of Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, as does Fool contributor Rich Smith. You can find him on CAPS, publicly pontificating under the handle TMFDitty, where he's currently ranked No. 327 out of more than 180,000 members. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 15, 2011, at 1:41 PM, DHRInsider wrote:

    I often read opinions about Southern Copper's dividend not being sustainable and therefore you should sell the stock. That implies the commentator is not familiar with the history and practices of the company in regards to their dividends policy. Of course it's not sustainable. It's entirely dependent upon profit levels and that, in turn, is primarily dependent upon copper prices, which range widely over time. But you can count on the company paying out the highest possible dividend given the current profit levels, unlike all other copper producers who pay out much smaller proportions of profits. As a long time investor in SCCO, I am willing to live with the fluctuating dividends and realize that in the long run, they are superior to any other copper producer as a total return investment.

  • Report this Comment On December 15, 2011, at 2:34 PM, KGaider wrote:

    I wish when someone writes an article that they would state the facts properly and make full disclosures.

    The writer defending Barclay's downgrade of SCCO fails to disclose that Barclay owns both Newmont and Freeport.

    The writer also fails to point out that Freeport's earnings and production have been seriously impacted by their re-occurring labor problems whereas SCCO although having some lowering of production from 6 years ago is now re-increasing production of not only copper but silver and moly as well. Also SCCO's eps and dividend have been rising this past year whereas Freeport's eps has been dropping and their dividend is stagnant and they have stopped paying a special dividend.

    The writer also fails to point out that a company's dividend is rarely set in stone and is based on available cash flow. SCCO as long as I've owned it has never paid out more than its eps and in fact over 2011 SCCO has not only paid a very nice dividend but has also set aside money from it's quarterly eps and has a fair chunk of cash in the bank to fund its expansion plans.

    The writer also fails to point out that starting in 2013 SCCO will be selling to China.

    The writer also fails to point out that SCCO management has a good track record of managing costs / hedging copper prices / sharebuyback program / and dealing quickly with labor and local protests so that UNLIKE FREEPORT- SCCO's earnings and production remain largely uneffected.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1742563, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/27/2012 4:42:37 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:03 PM
SCCO $28.79 Down -0.20 -0.69%
Southern Copper Co… CAPS Rating: ****
RIO $43.95 Down -0.78 -1.74%
Rio Tinto plc (ADR… CAPS Rating: ****
VALE $18.27 Up +0.05 +0.27%
Companhia Vale Ads CAPS Rating: ****
FCX $32.41 Down -0.16 -0.49%
Freeport-McMoRan C… CAPS Rating: ****
BHP $61.81 Down -0.99 -1.58%
BHP Billiton Limit… CAPS Rating: ****
BVN $38.71 Up +0.22 +0.57%
Companhia de Minas… CAPS Rating: ***

Advertisement