Recs

1

Is Macau Going 'Old School' Vegas?

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

On the 83rd anniversary of the St. Valentine's Day Massacre, Las Vegas celebrated the opening of its newest attraction, The Mob Museum. The city is widely believed to have been built by mob front men while the gangsters sat in the shadows, collecting profits. But when the last of the supposedly mob-owned hotels fell to a pile of rubble to make way for the new mega-resorts on the Las Vegas Strip years ago, many people believed organized crime no longer had any place in the gambling world.

Some recent developments may challenge that notion, however.

MGM (NYSE: MGM  ) parted ways with the land underneath Atlantic City's Borgata Hotel Casino for a deeply discounted $72 million in 2010. The sale was made after New Jersey casino regulators mandated they either sell their 50% stake in the area's most successful casino, or sever ties with Pansy Ho, their Chinese casino partner and rumored organized-crime boss. They chose Pansy Ho.

A mob of accusations
Just days before the opening of the museum, the SEC launched an informal inquiry into Wynn Resorts' (Nasdaq: WYNN  ) $135 million donation to the University of Macau in relation to its gaming licenses in the Chinese city. At this time, the SEC will simply review all documents pertaining to the donation and their gaming licenses or renewals in Macau. The inquiry follows a lawsuit by Wynn Resorts board member Kazuo Okada, who alleges he was denied access to documents pertaining to the donation.

Wynn is not the first Vegas casino operator whose Macau operations have been scrutinized by the SEC, either. In March of 2011, Las Vegas Sands (NYSE: LVS  ) dealt with the SEC looking into possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act for allegedly bribing foreign officials. That investigation was connected to a wrongful termination lawsuit from a former employee who allegedly used improper leverage against government officials in Macau.

At this point neither company has been formally charged, and most analysts believe the SEC will find no wrongdoing. But on the off chance that either company is found guilty, fines, jail time, and other legal penalties could be handed down to top managers and directors. With both Steve Wynn and Sheldon Adleson playing very important roles in their organizations, losing one of them would be devastating for shareholders.

Foolish Takeaway
I want to be very clear that in no way am I attempting to persuade anyone to believe that Wynn or Sands has broken the law, nor do I necessarily believe these organizations have committed illegal acts. But the underlying criminal past of the gambling world makes for an interesting backdrop.

To stay informed about how these investigations proceed, I encourage you to add these companies to your Watchlist using the links below. It's free, and will bring you all the relevant news and information about these firms.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Matt Thalman owns shares of MGM. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 14, 2012, at 6:28 PM, cp757 wrote:

    Matt good story I like your take for the St.Valentine's Day Massacre anniversary. I don't want to take anything away from your story but I want to get on my soap box about another anniversary. March 9 th 2009 at the very bottom of the ressesion.This is from another story ,they said: "At The Motley Fool, we love looking for the next Microsoft, Netflix, or Apple to supercharge our readers' portfolios. The term multibagger is a part of our terminology and our market-beating Rule Breakers newsletter is constantly looking for the next 10-bagger stock. The stock market hit its low on March 9, 2009. The best stock out of all the stocks you could have purchased on that day would be Las Vegas Sands. That stock is not even mentioned by anyone that talks about a ten bagger.If you compare any investment from that day to today none would have given you a better return. I have not found any Internet source including Motley Fool that points this fact out..No Internet source that would point out a 4000% point move.??? What does any one have to gain by not mentioning that kind of a return.?Not even a conversation .Not even a story about the investors that bought shares of the company and became millionaires out of the depths of the depression. I am missing something about the "new "news media. Put GLD,AAPL,BRK-A,WYNN,MGM,BIDU,CAT, or any other stock on a chart from 03/09/2009 to now and they will all be less than Las Vegas Sands and no one is saying a thing.

  • Report this Comment On February 14, 2012, at 6:52 PM, cp757 wrote:

    Matt I know you wanted to point out these things to tie in with Valentines Day and you dont think MGM,WYNN,LVS did anything wrong and I agree. I like your story because you said:I want to be very clear that in no way am I attempting to persuade anyone to believe that Wynn or Sands has broken the law, nor do I necessarily believe these organizations have committed illegal acts. But the underlying criminal past of the gambling world makes for an interesting backdrop. That was responsible .

  • Report this Comment On February 15, 2012, at 9:01 AM, xxatrm wrote:

    Matt you forgot to mention the equivalent of the LVS Foreign Corrupttion Protections Act investigation as it concerns LVS 's Asian properties in Asia has been resolved with no findings of wrong doing, that 's one heck of an omission, don't you think? I would say that 's a recent development.

  • Report this Comment On February 21, 2012, at 1:34 PM, jcabc wrote:

    The 2010 sale of the Borgata by MGM fell through. They still own half of it but it is held in trust while they look for a buyer.

    http://www.lvrj.com/business/mgm-resorts-gets-more-time-to-s...

    They have until March 24, 2013 to complete the sale.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1780985, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/27/2012 6:17:47 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
WYNN $102.04 Down -1.19 -1.15%
Wynn Resorts, Limi… CAPS Rating: **
MGM $10.80 Down -0.04 -0.37%
MGM Resorts Intern… CAPS Rating: ***
LVS $47.92 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Las Vegas Sands Co… CAPS Rating: ***

Advertisement