There wasn't too much surprise when Encana
Encana's total production was up 5% over last year, to 3.5 billion cubic feet per day, but given the price of natural gas last year, this isn't necessarily great news. The company had a rough fourth quarter, reporting a net loss of $246 million. Net earnings for the year came in at an abysmal $128 million, a painful number to acknowledge when compared to last year's earnings of $1.2 billion.
But, there were some positive signs, too. The fourth-quarter loss wasn't as bad as last year's fourth-quarter loss of $469 million. The company also made an important $515 million investment in liquids-rich properties, and divested $2.1 billion worth of assets. The move towards liquids is crucial if Encana plans to make any money in 2012. With that, let's take a look at the company's plan for the coming months.
First and foremost, Encana is cutting its North American natural gas supply. We've already seen a fair bit of this industry-wide, with Chesapeake Energy and Ultra Petroleum also announcing production cuts.
Encana will immediately stop production on wells producing 250 million cubic feet per day, increasing cuts up to 600 Mmcf/d as the year goes on. The company acknowledged the duration of voluntary reductions was subject to natural gas prices, and therefore could not say how long they would last.
Overall spending for 2012 will drop to $2.9 billion, a 37% reduction from last year, and in line with the previously-stated company goal of reducing spending by about $1 billion. More than 55% of the budget will be aimed at increasing liquids production.
Encana was also happy to facilitate yet another foreign company buying into American shale gas, signing an agreement with Mitsubishi (OTC: MSBHY) to develop its Cutbank Ridge assets in British Columbia. These are the very same assets from the failed deal with PetroChina
The new deal with Mitsubishi is a solid one. Encana sold a 40% stake in its 409,000 acres for $2.9 billion. Mitsubishi will pay $1.45 billion up front, and invest the balance in development over the course of five years. Sharing development costs is a great way to maintain production levels when you don't have enough money.
At the end of last year, I wrote that I considered Encana a solid turnaround play. An emphasis on lucrative liquids production can transform its balance sheet, regardless of how much it cuts natural gas production. The question that ultimately remains is: Can Encana develop its liquids-rich properties fast enough to make a difference on the bottom line this year?