5 Crucial Investing Lessons From Omaha

Click here to follow Jason on Twitter.

Over the weekend I had the good fortune to park it in the press box at the Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-A  ) (NYSE: BRK-B  ) annual meeting in Omaha, Neb. Seeing as I own shares personally as well as in my Motley portfolio here at Fool HQ, here are five takeaways that make me believe Berkshire Hathaway will be able to stand the test of time.

1. On CEOs and risk
The CEO must also be the leading risk officer. Today Buffett is the leading risk officer for Berkshire and his successor will have the same responsibility; this is non-negotiable. Buffett's reference to the big insurance operations within Berkshire and to the importance of being able to understand the risks involved with these particular businesses leads one to believe that his successor will be a leader from the insurance division; Ajit Jain with Berkshire Re. comes to mind immediately.

Takeaway: The buck has to stop somewhere, and with Berkshire this somewhere is and will continue to be with the CEO of the company even after Buffett steps down. Look for companies with leaders ready to take responsibility in good times and in bad.

2. On health
"I feel great. I love what I do. I work with people I love."
--Warren Buffett

He isn't taking his prostate cancer diagnosis lightly. But by the same token he said, "In all seriousness, it's a non-event." The medical center is right down the street from his office and he is confident he is in good hands. Sidekick Charlie Munger even cracked the joke that he resents all the sympathy and attention Warren is getting, saying he probably has more prostate cancer than Warren does.

Takeaway: Buffet's taking this as seriously as he feels he needs to. The fact is that when prostate cancer is diagnosed early (as in Buffett's case), the patient's chances of recovery are ostensibly 100%. Attitude is everything with something like this, and Warren's optimism is simply contagious.

3. On gold
Say you own an ounce of gold today. You hold it, love it, caress it, and take care of it. In 100 years you'll still own an ounce of gold. Now say you own 100 acres of farmland today. You love it and take care of it, and in 100 years you'll still own 100 acres of farmland. However, you'll also have had the time to produce crops to buy more stuff to produce more crops and buy more farmland and whatever else you want. The point is that there's a tremendous cycle of production here, whereas gold is more or less an unproductive asset.

Takeaway: There is no right or wrong answer where gold is concerned, but we know where Buffett and Munger stand. Productive assets are where it's at for them, and I agree wholeheartedly.

4. On what investments we should avoid today
Buffett stated that it's not just about avoiding the businesses you don't understand; on some level you can learn about and understand virtually anything. The key is to avoid the businesses where you don't have a reasonable understanding in regard to earnings power and competitive advantage over the next decade and beyond. It's why they chose not to invest in powerhouses like Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) and Google (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) , for example (which have both throttled the market over the last decade). Buffett and Munger didn't question the formidability of these businesses. But they just couldn't say with any confidence what the competitive landscape was going to look like at any given time in the future, so they passed.

Takeaway: It's OK to take a pass on something that is outside your scope of understanding. It's one thing to know that a business looks great today. It's another to know with any confidence where it may stand a decade from now.

5. On tax rates and growth
Are taxes really the problem? What is the ideal corporate tax rate? Well, in Buffett's eyes, corporate profits are not the problem. Neither are corporate tax rates. Corporate rates used to be much higher and the economy still performed. And Berkshire (along with others) is spending where they see opportunity. However, and I'll quote directly from the man himself, "Medical costs are the tapeworm of American industry." As it stands, we are at a huge cost disadvantage to the rest of the world in regard to our health care system -- and it may not be getting any better anytime soon.

Takeaway: Health care is so polarizing that I am doubtful we will get anything meaningful accomplished anytime soon. Until we do, the health care issue will continue to play front and center as a major deterrent of growth in our economy -- particularly for small businesses.

I was a Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting virgin
This was my first visit to Omaha and I came away fully satisfied. If I never go back I'll know that I was able to sit and listen at least once to two investors I greatly admire. The beautiful thing about investing is that we can do it for pretty much all of our lives, as long as we have the faculties to do it. And Warren and Charlie are living proof that this is true. Thanks, guys; it was a real pleasure.

It's a presidential election year and each candidate has his own plans to reignite the American growth engine into a full roar. There are unique ways to profit from the election -- if you buy the right stocks before the next president's term begins. Click here today for our free special report: "These Stocks Could Skyrocket After the 2012 Presidential Election."

Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst Jason Moser owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool owns shares of Google and Apple. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Apple and Google, as well as creating a bull call spread position in Apple. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.


Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (28)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 08, 2012, at 6:21 PM, xetn wrote:

    I suspect the reason why Buffett/Munger don't like gold is because they cannot control it. But I think this link makes more sense:

    http://www.caseyresearch.com/gsd/sites/default/files/Berkshi...

  • Report this Comment On May 11, 2012, at 7:41 PM, DaiEvans1955 wrote:

    Insightful Graph, Fool!

    TMF's have a somewhat longer time frame than 5 years - but if that makes you happy, go for it - fill your boots with it.

  • Report this Comment On May 11, 2012, at 9:18 PM, BubbaTX wrote:

    I wonder why WB purchased so much silver if it's a useless asset? Maybe because they thought it would go up? And as to gold, it is more a currency/store of value as in the treasuries he holds and knows he'll lose money on due to purchase price erosion due from inflation.

    Think of gold like a life, health, auto, home insurance. It's financial insurance. Difference is when AU is purchased, the cost doesn't go out the window. You still own it to carress, warm up to and watch. My insurance payments disappear forever, except that one.

    On 3rd February Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (BH) reported that it had purchased 129.7 million ounces of silver between July 1997 and January 1998. BH gave its reason for the purchases as "equilibrium between supply and demand was only likely to be established by a somewhat higher price".

    http://www.gold-eagle.com/gold_digest_98/milhouse020998.html

  • Report this Comment On May 12, 2012, at 10:27 AM, Xrap wrote:

    The "tapeworm" comment is right on. Health care costs are controlled by providers of health care. Neither the government nor the insurance companies have been able to control costs. That's because the competition in health care is signing up providers for "the network." If either the government or insurers get tough on costs, providers stop providing services, thus making it more difficult to sign up the insured. The psychiatrists just broadened the definition of addiction (including gambling addiction, among others), a move which will lead to government and private insurer coverage. In other words, the shrinks just expanded their market and voted themselves a raise. From our tax money. To control health care costs, we must control the providers. Not a dollar of health care costs goes to a receiver of medical care. Every dollar goes to a provider. Right now, invest in addiction care.

  • Report this Comment On May 12, 2012, at 7:51 PM, zhengning wrote:

    It is not the providers who need to be controlled. If we don't have TARP reform, there is no hope of reducing our health care cost. Congress and senate members are mostly lawyers who put the blame on the medical profession and benefit themselves with frivolous law suits. Americans, wake up. we are being manipulated by our legal system. We are loosing our excellent health care because of their greed.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1882126, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/24/2014 8:45:20 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement