1 Energy Stock With Big Growth Ahead

The following video is part of our "Motley Fool Conversations" series in which analyst Paul Chi and senior analyst Matt Argersinger discuss topics across the investing world.

In today's edition, Paul and Matt discuss Apache Corp., an internationally focused explorer and producer that has about 3 billion barrels of proved reserves. Paul believes Apache has a wealth of reinvestment opportunities right here in the U.S., particularly in the Permian Basin and the Anadarko Basin. The company has made these areas a focus and plans to ramp up drilling in the coming years.

Energy stocks offer something for all types of investors. Some companies rise and fall with oil prices, while others provide more steady returns over the long haul. The Motley Fool has identified a company that will prosper for years to come. Read more about an energy stock set to soar in our special free report: "The Only Energy Stock You'll Ever Need."Don't miss out on this limited-time offer and your opportunity to discover this under-the-radar company before the market does. Click here to access your report -- it's totally free.

Matt Argersinger has no positions in the stocks mentioned above. Paul Chi owns shares of Chesapeake Energy and Devon Energy. The Motley Fool owns shares of Devon Energy and has the following options: long JAN 2013 $16.00 calls on Chesapeake Energy, long JAN 2013 $25.00 calls on Chesapeake Energy, long JAN 2014 $20.00 calls on Chesapeake Energy, and long JAN 2014 $30.00 calls on Chesapeake Energy. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (5)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 25, 2012, at 2:47 PM, hbofbyu wrote:

    Who has time to watch a video?

  • Report this Comment On July 26, 2012, at 5:05 PM, mikevr1463 wrote:

    In conjunction with its large amount of potential NG reserves, its huge NG presence in BC, won't the agreement with Encana to build an LNG export facility in BC Canada propel APA even faster?

  • Report this Comment On July 27, 2012, at 5:45 PM, mikevr1463 wrote:

    How does APA compare to CHK in its NG holdiings?

    I know APA has from:

    EIA's Review of Emerging Resources: U.S. Shale Gas and Shale Oil Plays

    July 8, 2011

    “technically recoverable” Total US = 750 Tcf,

    Marcellus = 410 Tcf

    "Marketable NG”

    BC Liard Basin = 48 Tcf (based on production from 4 wells only)

    BC Horn river Basin =78 Tcf

    After CHK sells off its NG assets, will CHK still be #2 behind Exxon (due to XTO purchase)

  • Report this Comment On July 29, 2012, at 1:59 AM, mikevr1463 wrote:

    CLARIFICATION of my query [because Cramer just recommend APA]:

    How does APA compare to CHK in purely in its wet & dry NG holdiings? (which contributes to their 3 Beq total proven reserves)

    on July 8, 201, in EIA's Review of Emerging Resources: U.S. Shale Gas and Shale Oil Plays, EIA found for “technically recoverable” NG the Total US = 750 Tcf, while the total Marcellus was 410 Tcf.

    For comparison sake, APA guestimates it has from the BC Liard Basin = 48 Tcf "Marketable NG” (based on the production from 4 wells only)

    POINT: After CHK sells off its NG assets, will CHK remain #2 behind Exxon, or will APA become #2 ahead of both CHK and DVN?

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1923403, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/19/2014 1:17:21 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement