Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.

Recs

2

Better Buy: Netflix vs. Pandora

Motley Fool CTO Jeremy Phillips and tech analyst Eric Bleeker debate the merits of Netflix and Pandora. Jeremy picks Netflix because the company has room to grow and has been trying to lock up deals to control the intellectual property it distributes. Pandora, on the other hand, seems to lose money as it gains members and has not scaled successfully. Both agree Netflix is the buy.

If you're looking for something different, then you should check out our new free report, "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2012." In it, our chief investment officer identifies his favorite company for the year. To access the report before the rest of the market catches on, click here -- it's absolutely free.

Jeff Fischer and team have demystified options. And they can rack up income like $1,030... $2,626... and $3,228 on a schedule you can set your watch by!
That's why we're glad to announce every single one of their closely guarded strategies is available to YOU during May and June – 100% FREE, no strings attached! Just enter your email address in the box below...

Eric Bleeker and Jeremy Phillips have no positions in the stocks mentioned above. The Motley Fool owns shares of Netflix. Motley Fool newsletter services recommend Netflix. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 24, 2012, at 3:34 AM, orderartwork wrote:

    Which Pandora analyst should you believe?

    When Pandora IPO:

    Citigroup (C) analyst Mark Mahaney buy rating and $25 price target as a main underwriter on Pandora's IPO;

    It's also no surprise that fellow underwriters William Blair and Wells Fargo Securities also initiated coverage of Pandora on Monday with outperform ratings. Stifel Nicolaus, another underwriter on the initial public offering, started coverage today with a hold rating on Pandora.

    Similarly, IPO underwriter Morgan Stanley (MS) began coverage of Pandora with a hold rating with concerns about the company's path to profitability. Still, with a target price of $20, Morgan Stanley analysts are predicting some upside to the stock.

    This hasn't dissuaded JPMorgan (JPM) analyst Doug Anmuth from initiating the stock with an overweight rating and $22 price target, as he believes strong user growth will be followed by greater mobile monetization.

    Outside of Pandora's underwriters, the story is much different. The stock has a few other fans on Wall Street who rate it buy, but firms like Albert Fried & Co, Capstone Investments, and BTIG say investors should dump shares.

    BTIG analyst Richard Greenfield has a 12-month price target of $5.50, saying that while the company offers a "great consumer service," its business model "does not scale in the same way as other successful Internet businesses."

    Similarly, Albert Fried research director Rich Tullo praises Pandora as a great service, but notes that "great companies do not always offer attractive returns for equity investors. We have concerns about Pandora's financial statements in the near term and its long-term ability to monetize its user base." Tullo has a sell rating.

    Capstone Investments analyst Paul Meeks is also bearish with a sell rating. Meeks says "it's an Internet shell game," arguing that management, underwriters and Pandora bulls stay focused on the growth of users and listener hours while ignoring profits and cash flow.

    That shouldn't come as a surprise for a company struggling with the same problems Internet companies have struggled with for more than a decade: Will user growth lead to more revenue, and can that revenue be turned into profit?

  • Report this Comment On July 24, 2012, at 4:30 AM, orderartwork wrote:

    As famous Pandora pumper Rocco Pendola, I hope Rocco Pendola had added more now since you told us you add many shares when p was $10.4, which he was think it was his life time opportunity. Now it is under $10 now, I suggest you should add more though I belive it will be under $5 soon.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1952330, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/22/2013 8:29:44 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 11 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 15,387.58 52.30 0.34%
S&P 500 1,669.16 2.87 0.17%
NASD 3,502.12 5.69 0.16%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/21/2013 4:00 PM
P $16.20 Down -0.18 -1.10%
Pandora Media, Inc… CAPS Rating: *
NFLX $237.09 Down -2.46 -1.03%
Netflix CAPS Rating: **

Advertisement