The Efficient Market Hypothesis Debunked

In this video, Jack Schwager argues that huge single-day market dives couldn't happen if the efficient market hypothesis were true. But they do happen, and investors need to be prepared. Making the right financial decisions today makes a world of difference in your golden years; but with most people chronically under-saving for retirement, it's clear that not enough is being done. Don't make the same mistakes as the masses. I urge you to learn about The Shocking Can't-Miss Truth about Your Retirement. It won't cost you a thing, but don't wait, because your free report won't be available forever.

Brendan: Hey Fools, I'm Brendan Byrnes and I'm joined by author Jack Schwager, author of Market Sense and Nonsense. Jack, first of all, thank you so much for joining us.

Jack: Oh, it's great to be here. Thanks.

Brendan: It's really an excellent book. What you do is expose a lot of these investment misconceptions, one of which is the efficient market hypothesis, which you call the "deficient market" hypothesis.

Could you talk about that, and talk about why this is so widely taught if it's ... you do a great job of proving it wrong.

Jack: Right, right. It's so widely taught for the same reason. I use an example that may be a little bit of a cliché, but the drunk who drops his car keys at night, then looks under the lamp post because that's the only place there's light, not because he necessarily remembers dropping them there.

The efficient market hypothesis proponents use it as a cornerstone of financial theory because, if you make that assumption -- that the market's always right and everything's priced in and prices are randomly distributed -- you can quantify everything.

You can quantify what has more risk, supposedly; you can do portfolio optimization. It makes the math come out. You can measure risk, supposedly.

Even though the theory isn't correct in practice, it makes it easy to calculate an answer. It may not be the right answer, but you can get an answer.

Brendan: Can you give me, maybe, one specific that proves this wrong? You go over several in the book.

Jack: Oh, yeah. I don't know how to pick my favorite, but just take ... I don't have to go back to October '87 – there's millions of them – but the October '87 is the most amazing one, perhaps, because the market was down 29% in one day.

If market prices are always right, and that assumption goes with prices being normally distributed, the probability of getting a 29% drop in one day is such a small number, the only way I can do it is in an analogy.

It would be the probability of picking an atom -- one atom in the whole visible universe -- and then randomly selecting another atom, and picking the exact same atom. If you can believe that, then you can believe the efficient market hypothesis.

In this video, Jack Schwager argues that huge single-day market dives couldn't happen if the efficient market hypothesis were true. But they do happen, and investors need to be prepared. Making the right financial decisions today makes a world of difference in your golden years; but with most people chronically under-saving for retirement, it's clear that not enough is being done. Don't make the same mistakes as the masses. I urge you to learn about The Shocking Can't-Miss Truth about Your Retirement. It won't cost you a thing, but don't wait, because your free report won't be available forever.


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (5)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2170810, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/20/2014 2:36:00 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement