Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



Las Vegas Sands Continues to Fight Lawsuits

Las Vegas Sands (NYSE: LVS  ) continues to fight off lawsuits, and a $328 million claim from a Hong Kong businessman is the latest to hit headlines. The Fool's Erin Miller sat down with analyst Travis Hoium to see if this is a concern for the company going forward or something investors can look past. 

For many companies, successfully capitalizing on a booming Chinese economy is like winning the jackpot. That's indeed the case for Las Vegas Sands, which made a big bet on Macau gaming about a decade ago that's paid off in spades. The company is now looking to spread its empire further, but will it be able to replicate its prior successes? Learn about all these opportunities, and the risks they pose, in our premium report on Las Vegas Sands. Be sure to claim your copy today by clicking here.

Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 11, 2013, at 12:28 PM, spokanimal wrote:

    In his dialogue, Mr. Hoium is placing to much emphasis on the fact that LVS lost it's original case against Mr. Suen.

    On the contrary, the 2, primary reasons that the Nevada supreme court threw out the original verdict were arguably the 2 most important reasons that Suen offered up in the case.

    1. That Weidner originally testified that Stanley Ho had commented on Beijing having influence over the award of the license. That was not only hearsay, but Mr. Ho is known for off-the-cuff remarks with political overtones bent on generating influence.

    2. That the judge failed to instruct the jury that they should presume that governments are following their countries' laws... in this case that Beijing's non-interference statutes as they pertain to the SARs. A top Chinese official re-asserted that policy in an interview last week.

    Forget the previous trial, Travis. The differences between the 2 trials favor LVS much more in the sequel.


Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2358534, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/26/2016 7:05:02 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 2 days ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,261.45 -131.01 -0.71%
S&P 500 2,164.69 -12.49 -0.57%
NASD 5,305.75 -33.78 -0.63%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

9/23/2016 4:01 PM
LVS $57.38 Up +0.21 +0.37%
Las Vegas Sands CAPS Rating: ****