Should Wall Street go Back to the Partnership Model?

Most Wall Street investment banks used to be partnerships. They were owned by the firm's senior employees, who invested their own money to fund the bank's balance sheet. When the bank screwed up, it came right out of their own pockets. Lisa Endlich's 1999 book, The Culture of Success, describes just how aligned the partners were with the bank's performance:

In a private partnership none of the assets of partners are shielded from liability, and the individual partners are exposed down to the pennies in their children's piggy banks ... The actions of a rogue trader could spell personal bankruptcy ...

That's changed over the last three decades. Investment banks transitioned into public companies, where the capital was largely owned by outside investors, and partners no longer held unlimited liability. That opened the doors to take new risks. Today, the last remaining big investment banks, Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS  ) and Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS  ) , partake in practices that never would have been considered under the old partnership model.

Which raises the question: Should we go back to the old partnership model?

It's a question I've addressed before.

Last week, I asked David Cowen, CEO of the Museum of American Finance and a financial historian, what he thought. Have a look (transcript follows):

Cowen: "When those investment houses were partnership owned, it was their own capital on the line, and yeah, the commercial banks, they were always public, but now the investment banks go public and that gives them the opportunity to potentially lever lot more. If you take a look at a Lehman Brothers, and they're still in the process of unwinding all that, but 30, 35 times, 40 times possibly even leverage, would that have happened if it was the partner's money? And we know back in the day, the partners had much less leverage or capital that they've deployed in case something went wrong." 

Read/Post Comments (0) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2376706, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/27/2016 5:39:48 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 8 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,473.75 -19.31 -0.10%
S&P 500 2,169.18 0.70 0.03%
NASD 5,110.05 12.42 0.24%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

7/26/2016 4:00 PM
GS $161.16 Up +0.65 +0.40%
Goldman Sachs CAPS Rating: ***
MS $29.23 Up +0.10 +0.34%
Morgan Stanley CAPS Rating: ***