Watch stocks you care about
The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...
Your own personalized stock watchlist!
It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...
There are many undeniable tailwinds the pharmaceutical industry should capitalize on going forward, such as rising health-care costs and the aging U.S. population.
At the same time, the pharmaceutical industry isn't without its share of risks. Most prominently, some companies face losing patent protection on billion-dollar drugs, opening the floodgates to cheaper, generic competition.
Therefore, it's worth plowing deeper into the patent cliffs facing Pfizer (NYSE: PFE ) , GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE: GSK ) , and Merck (NYSE: MRK ) , and whether any of these companies should be avoided as a result.
Pfizer's patent problems
Pfizer is already feeling the effects of losing patent protection on a blockbuster drug. Its best-selling drug ever, cholesterol medication Lipitor, brought in $10 billion to Pfizer's coffers alone as recently as two years ago. Fast forward to today, and Lipitor accounted for just $545 million in revenue in the company's most recent quarter.
The situation is such that Pfizer's full-year 2012 sales fell 10%, which management attributed largely to losing Lipitor exclusivity. The problem has extended into the current year, as sales dropped another 9% through the first six months of the year.
Focus is now squarely on Lyrica, which is the company's best-selling drug and now makes up 9% of Pfizer's total revenue. Pfizer scored a huge victory last year when a court ruling sealed Lyrica's exclusivity through 2018.
This is important because of Pfizer's reliance on pharmaceuticals. Pfizer recently spun off its animal health business, and its consumer products segment represented just 6% of revenue in the most recent quarter.
Glaxo's smoother road ahead
Glaxo is likely to navigate the next few years more smoothly than many of its rivals, due to its more diverse revenue split between pharmaceuticals, vaccines, and consumer products. Vaccines and consumer products account for about one-third of the company's revenue.
However, Glaxo's situation is clouded by the fact that its current best-selling drug, respiratory inhaler Advair, is undergoing patent loss. This is noteworthy since Advair made up 20% of Glaxo's total sales through the first half of the year.
The market hasn't concerned itself with Advair going off patent, and there's a reason why. Glaxo management has long contended that Advair would be extremely difficult for generic competitors to copy, due to its uniqueness. Glaxo contends their inhaler manufacturing technology would be nearly impossible to duplicate, and to this point, the company's assertion has been accurate.
At the same time, even Glaxo's CEO himself admitted in the company's most recent post-earnings conference call that competition won't remain shut out forever. Therefore, the rapidly evolving COPD market is one issue Glaxo investors should carefully monitor going forward.
Merck muddling through
Merck is fully ensnared by loss of patent exclusivity. In its case, second-quarter net income dropped by nearly half to $906 million, from $1.79 billion the year prior. This was due heavily to the loss of allergy and asthma drug Singulair, which saw 80% lower quarterly sales.
Positively, Merck's diabetes medication Januvia increased sales by 1%, to more than $1 billion, and CEO Kenneth Frazier noted that seven of the company's top 10 products grew during the quarter.
Of particular concern is that Merck saw weakness in its other two major segments, animal health and consumer care, which realized 1.6% and 11% sales declines, respectively.
Going forward, Merck does not boast a very strong pipeline. There are high hopes for a few potential blockbusters, but Merck's future portfolio does not have a well-defined path forward. It is unclear how the company can fully replace lost Singulair sales.
Avoid steep patent cliffs
Large pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck are allocating considerable resources to research and development, which will blunt the blow of losing any individual blockbuster to generic competition.
At the same time, some companies face steeper patent cliffs than others.
While Pfizer is a huge company and is massively profitable, the loss of Lipitor will undeniably serve as a drag on its results for some time, and the company cannot rely on strong performance from non-pharmaceutical related business segments.
Merck is seeing strength with its new diabetes drug, but the loss of Singulair in addition to broader weakness in the company's other segments places it in a difficult position. Moreover, a pharmaceutical pipeline that should be considered iffy at best is a concern.
On the other hand, Glaxo is resilient in the current environment. Avandia is likely to retain its dominance for the foreseeable future, which should allow ample time for Glaxo to improve its already sterling inhaler positioning. With no looming threat of patent loss and a more diverse revenue split, Glaxo appears to be the big pharma stock on this list best positioned to face its patent cliff.
One of the best parts of owning big pharma stocks is their attractive dividends, but smart investors know the importance of diversifying -- seeking high-yielding stocks from multiple industries. The Motley Fool's special free report "Secure Your Future With 9 Rock-Solid Dividend Stocks" outlines the Fool’s favorite dependable dividend-paying stocks across all sectors. Grab your free copy by clicking here.