Will a Scuttled Airline Merger Hurt Smaller Carriers?

The Department of Justice's challenge to the proposed merger between US Airways and American Airlines parent company AMR surprised many analysts, including me. With the chances of the merger's completion now up in the air, it's time to look at how a failure to complete this merger might affect smaller industry players.

Potential slot gains
An independent reorganized American Airlines may decide to shrink operations, perhaps by selling off assets. While major carriers United, Delta, and US Airways would be bidders under this scenario, it would also give smaller carriers the opportunity to acquire new airport slots.

One airline that might gain an opportunity here is JetBlue Airways (NASDAQ: JBLU  ) . It would like to expand its network in the Northeast, but the slots given to various carries have made that expansion difficult. If a restructured American were to divest airport slots in this region, JetBlue could gain further access to cities such as New York and Washington, D.C.

While JetBlue focuses on the East Coast, Alaska Air Group (NYSE: ALK  ) , parent company of Alaska Airlines, could benefit from acquiring new slots along the West Coast. If American Airlines has to shrink its Los Angeles operations, Alaska Airlines may be able to pick up slots at a highly popular airport. This, in turn, would boost the strength of Alaska's network, giving it a greater presence in the West Coast market.

Hawaiian Airlines (NASDAQ: HA  ) may be able to make West Coast acquisitions as well, while it works to build its domestic route network. However, some of the benefits may be balanced out by rivals that can also acquire additional West Coast slots and move into Hawaiian's market. Regardless, Hawaiian Airlines is trying to diversify operations by launching additional flights from the Asia/Pacific region, selling tourism to developing countries' growing middle classes. Even if rivals can gain a greater presence in the West Coast-to-Hawaii market, Hawaiian can still generate revenues from sales across the Pacific.

Large competitor factor
One of the difficulties faced by smaller carriers is a lack of economic scale and pricing power compared with the largest industry players. But a collapse of the US Airways/AMR merger would prevent the New American Airlines from taking even greater control over routes and fares. Now, this poses an interesting question: Would a large airline oligopoly help or hurt smaller carriers?

Initially, it seems pretty clear that such an industry setup would allow large carriers to squeeze smaller ones out through predatory means. But if the largest carriers stick to their own routes, and fares rise as a result, then smaller carriers would have more room to raise fares on alternative routes.

If the merger fails, airline fares are unlikely to rise quite as quickly. This would in turn require smaller carriers to keep fares down, even on alternative routes, to remain competitive with travelers. But the threat of predatory tactics by majors would be reduced as well. So it's unclear whether higher fares would be balanced out by predatory tactics for smaller airlines. And until a merger does happen, no one will know for sure.

Industry surprise
Despite causing an initial drop in shares of smaller carriers, the DOJ lawsuit filing against the US Airways-AMR merger has some silver linings for non-legacy players. However, the exact effects will be largely a product of the actions taken by major carriers. Investors in small airlines should keep an eye on industry airfare trends as continuing upward movement gives smaller carriers more room to raise their own fares. 

In the event the merger is allowed to proceed, investors in smaller airlines need to watch out for predatory pricing tactics. While technically illegal, regulatory action is rarely quick enough to mitigate all damage to smaller competitors. So, unlike the market's virtually universal negative reaction, the skies ahead for smaller carriers may have even more opportunities than before.

Warren Buffett has claimed that investing in airlines is a surefire way to lose your hard-earned cash. But two airlines are breaking all the rules by keeping costs low and avoiding direct competition -- leading to enviable profits. Click here to learn how these two airlines are leading a revolution in the industry, and discover whether they can keep delivering big gains for shareholders!


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 10, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Smart1K wrote:

    With all due respect, the article is completely wrong or misleading on many counts:

    1. Major US airlines have not used major asset sales as a means of raising cash since the 1990s, a time period that proved that airlines cannot sell off large parts of their operation and how to make a viable carrier out of the remaining husk.

    2. There's no reason for AMR to engage in any significant asset sales because the company is still flush with cash, and American Airlines necessarily depends on access to key airports to cater to the premium flyers that produce the profits.

    3. LAX is NOT a slot-controlled airport. Any airline can fly to or from LAX at any time, so long as they have a gate. LAX is also a key cornerstone hub for American, and that will remain true whether or not it merges with US Airways.

  • Report this Comment On September 10, 2013, at 2:44 PM, SOBEflyGuy wrote:

    Honestly, the flying public that has been slowly driven back to the fares without the service, options and variety prior to DEREGULATION in the 1970's could care less about the size of AA/AMR and the merger with USAir!

    The fares that are disguised as lower than when airlines were GOVERNMENT REGULATED is a myth! When you ad the fees and penalties plus the charges for baggage we are paying the same fares as before with more crowded cabins, no amenities and total disregard for the basic human needs of the flying public!

    This merger should be blocked and GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS re-implented on this industry of thief's!

  • Report this Comment On September 10, 2013, at 6:17 PM, joey7712 wrote:

    Jet Blue to Bangor, ME!!!

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2615666, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/18/2014 5:48:20 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement