Whatever Happened To the Natural Gas Revolution?

Remember the natural gas revolution?

In April 2012, natural gas prices hit historic lows under $2 per million British thermal units (mmBtu) after a long decline, driven by the fracking boom. Stocks positioned to benefit from a mass conversion to natural gas soared. Shares of natural gas engine-designer Westport Innovations (NASDAQ: WPRT  ) nearly doubled in four months as did Clean Energy Fuels (NASDAQ: CLNE  ) , which builds natural gas fueling stations.

Congress was poised to pass the NAT GAS Act, a bill that would give subsidies to vehicles using alternative fuels. President Obama was touting the benefits of alternative energy from a homegrown source , devising plans to provide $1 billion for natural gas infrastructure. A world where natural gas vehicles were competing with gasoline-powered seemed to be right on the horizon.

Fast forward 18 months, and these visions seem like just a hazy fantasy. Natural gas prices are nearly double what they were back then, topping $4 back in the spring. No legislation ever came out of Congress to encourage the adoption of natural gas vehicles, and stocks like Westport and Clean Energy have flat-lined, losing nearly half their value from those peaks.

Source: Cheniere.com

What happened?
The $2/mmBtu price tag proved to be unsustainable for producers, who finally managed to cut back production, and prices seem to have found an equilibrium near $4. And while fuel stocks have tumbled, other industry players such as natural gas exporters have been on the rise as $4 is still significantly lower than prices in Europe and Asia. Most notably is Cheniere Energy (NYSEMKT: LNG  ) whose shares have more than doubled since last spring as the company makes headway on its conversion of the Sabine Pass LNG terminal to outfit it for exports. The facility is expected to come on line by 2015.

One crucial component from the NAT GAS bill had been to keep all domestically extracted gas within the country, but the country clearly seems to be on the opposite path now . In fact, yesterday, shares of Dominion Resources (NYSE: D  ) hit an all-time high after the company received approval from the Department of Energy to export natural gas to countries outside of US free-trade zones . Dominion plans to begin reconfiguring its Cove Point facility in Maryland next year with completion targeted for 2017.

With the approval, Dominion becomes the fourth LNG exporter, joining Freeport LNG and Lake Charles Exports , a joint venture between Energy Transfer Partners and BG Group. We could see many more energy companies follow suit as Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz has vowed to examine a dozen other similar requests this year .

Where do we go now?
18 months after natural gas prices bottomed out, the window of opportunity seems to be closing for natural gas fueling companies like Westport and Clean Energy. Low prices attract attention, and gas prices seem set to float upward once exports begin with Cheniere in 2015. The Obama administration has already allowed permitting for 6.37 billion cubic feet of LNG to be exported daily, nearly 10% of US production , and more could soon be on the way considering new Secretary Moniz's promise to render a decision on a dozen more requests by year's end.

The revolution will not be televised
Congress never passed the natural gas act, but the Obama administration has been active elsewhere on the legislative front, cracking down on the coal-fired power plants, and favoring a switch to cleaner, cheaper natural gas. The Environmental Protection Agency is now advocating laws that would require any new coal plant to install expensive carbon-capturing technology, which would hasten the demise of coal and increase demand for natural gas .

Fuel for natural gas trucks is about 20% cheaper today than traditional options, but a small change in the supply/demand equilibrium could eliminate that advantage.

Last fall, Westport dramatically cut back its guidance, so much so that it's seeing declining revenue this year, blaming the cut on customers' decisions to delay orders and cut inventory due to a lack of fueling infrastructure . Other beneficiaries of the production boom such as exporters and utilities don't suffer from this chicken-and-egg problem.

Natural gas adoption should grow for the short-haul fleets that already use it, but don't expect it to displace the long-haul trucks and other vehicles that rely on diesel and gasoline. Currently there are about 120,000 conventional filling stations compared to only about 1,000 for natural gas , and companies like Tesla are making a case for the viability of the electric car, leapfrogging fossil fuel vehicles.

With major changes afoot in the industry, the natural gas revolution may be upon us, but don't expect to see it on the highway.

Looking for another angle in natural resources? Then you owe it to yourself to discover the most precious resource in the history of the world. It's not gold. Or even oil. But it's more valuable than both of them. Combined. And here's the crazy part: one emerging company already has the market cornered... and stands to make in-the-know investors boatloads of cash. We reveal all in our special 100% FREE report The 21st Century's Most Precious Natural Resource. Just click here for instant access!


Read/Post Comments (6) | Recommend This Article (8)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 14, 2013, at 5:38 AM, SirMega wrote:

    Two main problems with the natural gas revolution. A) Where would you fill up your car? Even if someone gave me a luxury natural gas vehicle, I would not even bother paying insurance on it because I would not be able to drive it due to no area station to fill it up at. Some areas DO have stations, but even those that do still have people complaining on how far they have to travel out of their way to reach them.

    B) As soon as it "caught on" the price of natural gas would logically skyrocket and not only would there be no advantage, many would have to choose between eating, driving to work or heating their homes and keeping their family warm in the winter; "please only pick one of the three!" would be the situation for a lot of lower to middle class families.

  • Report this Comment On September 14, 2013, at 9:15 AM, drmaddogs wrote:

    What happened? Certain 'insiders' such as Pelosi have realized their goals in such companies as CLNE. When certain 'insiders' change the market place for NG by allowing unlimited exports of NG and unlimited futures markets for NG, then the 'insiders' in D.C. will make NG 'Happen' again.

  • Report this Comment On September 14, 2013, at 10:26 AM, speculawyer wrote:

    More than 11,000 plug-in vehicles were sold in August. For light-duty vehicles, electrifying them is just better. A home charger is cheap and requires no maintenance. A home CNG filler is more expensive and requires annual maintenance since it is a mechanical device.

  • Report this Comment On September 14, 2013, at 12:58 PM, AllenElliott wrote:

    this is what patrolium companies do. They cut production that they may steal more money from the people dependent on their product.The scriptures says that the false prophet brakes in to steal and murder.

  • Report this Comment On September 14, 2013, at 2:24 PM, pjwinick wrote:

    All forward thinking growth companies have their detractors. It is a very good sign that the folks like Jeremy who have chosen that role regarding CLNE, have no idea what they are talking about. If Jeremy is the best of the CLNE detractors, the company is in very good shape.

  • Report this Comment On September 14, 2013, at 10:03 PM, nickcray wrote:

    The rate of building CNG filling stations is growing at 30% or more per year. They've a long way to go before getting close to the liquid fuel stations, but their building rate is not slowing down. Everyone I've seen advertises CNG at $1.75-$2.00 per gallon, as compared to diesel at $4.00 per gallon. The writer is reading too much Clean Energy press. Their business model is not being accepted well.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2637007, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/21/2014 12:32:10 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement