How Long Can the Coal Last?

Although how much coal a miner like Peabody Energy (NYSE: BTU  ) pulls out of the ground each year is the big headline, its future success is actually more dependent on how much coal it has left in the ground. That coal, known as proved and probable reserves, represents the company's future earnings power. You should get to know it well.

That's a big... number
In 2012, Peabody pulled around 250 million tons of coal out of the ground. That's a huge amount of coal, considering that competitor Arch Coal (NYSE: ACI  ) , another industry giant, mined "only" about 135 million tons.

Looking at proven and probable reserves, however, makes the size of these two industry players even more disparate. At the start of the year, Peabody had 9.3 billion (with a b) tons of coal that it had yet to pull from the ground. Arch started the year with about 2.1 billion tons. This provides a sense of Peabody's scale.

What is proved and probable?
Although there are explicit regulations around the terms proved and probable, suffice it to say that this is the amount of coal that a miner believes can be profitably mined. The number changes. For example, buying or selling coal lands and mines would clearly impact the number. However, the price of coal is also a factor: "Only coal reserves expected to be mined economically are included in our reserve estimates," explains Peabody.

So the reserve number is always a work in progress. What isn't up for debate, however, is how much coal gets mined. With 9.3 billion in reserve coal at the start of 2013 and using first half production as an average run rate, Peabody has around 35 years of coal left to mine, often called reserve life.

Dividing Arch's coal in the ground by what it's been mining shows that the company has less than half that at 15 years. Metallurgical coal focused Walter Energy (NYSE: WLT  ) , meanwhile, has reserves of 400 million tons and, based on its recent mining rate, has around 30 years of reserves.

Why care?
Proven and probable reserves aren't usually headline grabbing numbers and they don't really need to be. However, they are worth looking for at least once a year. Over short periods, a falling reserve number isn't the end of the world, but longer term it has significant implications. For example, if Arch did nothing but mine its current coal it would go out of business in 15 years or so, well before Peabody or Walter.

Looking at the oil sector can give a different perspective on how important this is. French energy giant Total (NYSE: TOT  ) , for example, only found enough new oil to cover 75% of what it sold between 2007 and 2009. Looked at in another way, its reserves fell by 25% of its annual production in those years. It was pleased to point out, however, that the average replacement rate was 136% between 2010 and 2012. The company is trumpeting a turnaround in its exploration efforts because it improves its corporate outlook. 

Easier to find
Coal is a lot easier to find than oil, which is why reserves are so important in the oil industry but make fewer headlines in the coal space. Still, the current coal market malaise has left miners hitting the pause button on expansion projects and even selling assets in some cases.

Going back a couple of years to when times were flush, however, shows that mistakes were made. Walter bought Western Coal for $3.3 billion in early 2011, increasing its reserves from just under 200 million tons to around 385 million tons. A year or so later, the company wrote off a third of the acquisition. It overpaid for that coal and shareholders suffered for it.

When lean times turn flush again, you'll want to make sure that companies aren't overpaying for an acquisition to boost reserves that have languished during the downturn. Of the trio above, Arch is probably most at risk of pushing the envelope on this front. But you should take the time to check the reserves for all of your coal companies so you know where they stand, too.  

What's more precious than oil or gold?
Interested in natural resources? Then you owe it to yourself to discover the most precious resource in the history of the world. It's not gold. Or even oil. But it's more valuable than both of them. Combined. And here's the crazy part: one emerging company already has the market cornered... and stands to make in-the-know investors boatloads of cash. We reveal all in our special 100% FREE report The 21st Century's Most Precious Natural Resource. Just click here for instant access!


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 06, 2013, at 8:42 PM, lvmech5 wrote:

    You might want to check your facts on Arch Coal available reserves is over 5 billion tons.

  • Report this Comment On October 07, 2013, at 1:46 PM, tripoley1966 wrote:

    Ditto, ACI has 5B tons in reserves. That puts ACI at ~37 years.

  • Report this Comment On October 07, 2013, at 3:36 PM, NorwayRed wrote:

    If we burn all the current proven and probable reserves of black energy (coal, oil and natural gas), scientists say we might be able to destroy the Earth five times over. The balance sheet values attributed to black energy reserves may turn out to be essentially worthless if greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are ever actually controlled. (And if they are never controlled, life on Earth may be dramatically altered.) "Short" all black energy long term? But who knows how long it will be before politicians manage to control GHG emissions. British Columbia has perhaps the most effective carbon tax in the world. Studies show it is effective at controlling GHG emissions. The EU cap and trade system has so far failed to control their GHG emissions.

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2669079, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/25/2014 3:47:22 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement