Ask a Fool: Is It Better to Buy One High-Priced Stock or Multiple Lower-Priced Stocks?

In this edition of The Motley Fool's "Ask a Fool" series, Motley Fool One analyst Jason Moser takes a question from a Fool reader who asks: "If you have about $500 to invest, is it better to buy one share of a $500 stock like Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) or 30 shares of a $17 stock like Ford (NYSE: F  ) ?

It's no secret that investors tend to be impatient with the market, but the best investment strategy is to buy shares in solid businesses and keep them for the long term. In the special free report, "3 Stocks That Will Help You Retire Rich," The Motley Fool shares investment ideas and strategies that could help you build wealth for years to come. Click here to grab your free copy today.

Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (6)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 19, 2013, at 7:50 PM, neamakri wrote:

    good question. My opinion; in either case you are purchasing $500 of a company. So the correct answer is to pick the company that you will be proud to own.

  • Report this Comment On December 08, 2013, at 2:16 PM, RussMon wrote:

    It's an extremely good quesion. The answer raised is also good but also lame at the same time. Of course the company behind it should be good.

    How ever, let's say both are undervalued and both pay a dividend. I would say take the 30 shares, because you can then partially close your position instead of the entire thing at once.

  • Report this Comment On December 08, 2013, at 8:33 PM, FKash wrote:

    I think I would be among a select fewer investors getting the single share. The less expensive stock might be purchased by investors who panic more easily from bad news. But i don't know if that is true. It may be that with only $500 toi spend you would be more likely to buy the less expensive stock thinking that you have

    29 tickets plus some left over for a cup of coffee.

  • Report this Comment On December 12, 2013, at 2:05 PM, joeorsi wrote:

    This really shouldn't even be a factor that you consider.

  • Report this Comment On December 12, 2013, at 2:12 PM, MRCulkin wrote:

    It doesn't matter. You measure stock success on percentages, not $. That's why I used to chuckle back when stock splitting was all the rage.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2735048, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/1/2016 5:08:50 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 19 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,308.15 164.70 0.91%
S&P 500 2,168.27 17.14 0.80%
NASD 5,312.00 42.85 0.81%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

9/30/2016 4:00 PM
AAPL $113.05 Up +0.87 +0.78%
Apple CAPS Rating: ****
F $12.07 Up +0.10 +0.84%
Ford CAPS Rating: ****