Can Intel Do With Phones What It's Doing With Tablets?

Intel (NASDAQ: INTC  ) boldly proclaimed that it would be selling "at least" 40 million tablet chips throughout calendar year 2014. While getting there will require the company to forgo any real revenue or profit on the chips (thanks to some hefty subsidies), this can be viewed as a relationship-building exercise with the major OEMs. The expectation, of course, is that when the products have the "right" cost structure come 2015, Intel can unlock substantial profitability here. With that in mind, the big question is whether Intel can do the same thing with smartphones.

It's not quite as straightforward
Intel has proven that it can hang with the best of the ARM crowd when it comes to tablet performance and power consumption. Further, since tablets don't usually ship with cellular technology, Intel's lack of an integrated cellular baseband in its products isn't much of a barrier to winning designs in this space (particularly since Intel is shipping discrete data LTE products today). However, the smartphone space is quite a different animal.

In this space, of course, the applications processor is important. Qualcomm (NASDAQ: QCOM  ) , the leader in this market, clearly puts a great deal into research and development, but the modem is arguably more important. During 2014, Intel will have a lineup of fairly competitive applications processors with "Merrifield" and its quad-core cousin, "Moorefield." Its XMM 7260 discrete modem looks good, but how will it hold up to what market-leader Qualcomm will have?

It is likely that, thanks to the low-power 22-nanometer process and exceptional Silvermont CPU design, Intel's apps processors for phones will be lower power than what Qualcomm is able to do with its 28-nanometer Snapdragon parts (the highest end of which have already garnered a reputation for throttling back performance in phones due to heat). However, next year, Qualcomm will still have an advantage on integration (Qualcomm's high-end Snapdragons integrate Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and cellular baseband). While this isn't likely to be a deal breaker for Intel, it's going to make it tough to convince OEMs to switch to Intel.

Could Intel pull the same trick twice?
The big question is whether Intel is going to try to pull the same trick with smartphones as it is doing with tablets. While Intel's smartphone platforms will be designed for smartphones, the bill of materials issue that plagued Bay Trail's assault into the low end won't be here for Merrifield/Moorefield. However, converting designs that are currently in the clutches of Qualcomm will be difficult, unless Intel is willing to price incredibly aggressively.

Further, the bigger concern is the modem technology. Intel's modem products do not include CDMA support, so many of the phone vendors that are used to Qualcomm's parts across their entire lineups would have to do two potential SKUs: one with an Intel apps processor and Intel modem, and one with either an Intel apps processor and Qualcomm modem or a Qualcomm integrated apps processor and modem. It is likely that OEMs would choose the integrated Qualcomm solution.

Finally, Qualcomm is aggressively taking content share in phones by pushing its own connectivity combo chip solutions as well as its own power management ICs and audio CODECs. In short, Qualcomm can offer "the complete platform" to handset OEMs, while Intel still isn't quite there yet. Indeed, Intel has yet to ship its own low-power connectivity combo chips (although word on the street is that they'll be coming at some point next year).

Foolish bottom line
While the tablet market is very much like the PC market in that integration isn't as important and providing the "complete" solution isn't absolutely critical, the smartphone market is an entirely different beast. With that in mind, it is likely that 2014 will be a year in which Intel wins a few "important" smartphone designs from the likes of Google/Motorola, LG, and HTC. But, the company will still have a tough time displacing Qualcomm in the flagship designs until 2015. 

Listen -- before they shut us up!
Our top technology analyst recently infiltrated one of Wall Street's most exclusive gatherings... and left with three incredible investment opportunities, straight from the CEOs. These are profit-building strategies Main Street isn't meant to hear about -- so you must act now before someone shuts us up. Click if you want "industry insider" earnings -- NOW!


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 27, 2013, at 7:41 PM, techy46 wrote:

    Intel's always projected its future very conservatively. I think the 40 million tablet chips will easily be more like 60-80 million. My Asus T100 10" 64Gb Bay Trail-T 2-in-1notebook and tablet for $379 at WalMart is faster and lasts lomger on battery then my Toshiba L50 W7 notebook. Intel needs 14nm Atom with integrated LTE to take on Qualcomm in 2014-15.

  • Report this Comment On November 28, 2013, at 4:43 AM, doawithlife wrote:

    Watch Intel do its part.

    Then Windows will come along and make Win 9 to be a hybrid phone/tablet/pc os.

    Ehh, maybe Apple will make OSx tiny kitty.

    If I were Intel I would be hessitant to have Windows lead the way again. The more x86 handhelds sold, the more money companies invest into x86 tech at this scale. MS royally boned x86 in tablets.

    If Apple is indeed planning an x86 tablet, well call me happy. At least they will sell some units and push money into the tech.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2745389, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/1/2014 4:56:33 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement