1 Thing Investors Are Missing About Fannie Mae

Fannie Mae (NASDAQOTCBB: FNMA  ) has had an incredible run in 2013. Its stock is incredibly up almost 1000% on the year. But there is one critical thing investors may be missing about this stock.

Fannie Mae headquarters in Washington, D.C.  Photo: Flickr/Future Atlas.

Its goals are not your goals
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are the two government-sponsored entities, or GSEs, that are principally responsible for providing liquidity in the mortgage market by guaranteeing and buying mortgages from banks. Yet following the spectacular collapse of the housing market in 2008, Fannie Mae was placed into conservatorship by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, or FHFA, as it received a total of $116.1 billion in government bailout funds.

So what does that mean for investors? Well, the FHFA states plainly, "As conservator, the [FHFA] assumed all the powers of the shareholders, directors, and officers, with the goal of preserving and conserving the assets and property of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac."

Read that statement again.

The FHFA is in complete control of Fannie Mae, and its goal is simply to preserve and conserve its assets.

In the most recent annual report, the position is repeated, noting that "[t]he conservatorship is a statutory process designed to preserve and conserve our assets and property and put the company in a sound and solvent condition."

As conservator, its only aim is to "preserve and conserve," with the ultimate outcome being that the company is "sound and solvent."

Think about that for a moment. When you're buying stock in a company, you aren't gambling on the success of it, but taking ownership in it, with the explicit understanding that the managers and directors will operate in a way that seeks to maximize the value of the return on your investment. Yet in the case of Fannie Mae, it exclusively operates with its conservator's interests in mind, not those of its shareholders.

Consider Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-A  ) (NYSE: BRK-B  ) , Warren Buffett's empire that has been one of the best investments of the past half century. Care to guess what the line item at the bottom of the income statement is titled? "Comprehensive income attributable to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders" (emphasis mine). And at Fannie Mae? "Net income (loss) attributable to Fannie Mae" (emphasis, again, added).

In fact, Buffett even notes that the company's "long-term economic goal ... is to maximize Berkshire's average annual rate of gain in intrinsic business value on a per-share basis." That's a far cry from the "preserve and conserve," "sound and solvent" mentality that those at the helm of Freddie Mac hold.

It isn't even so much that Fannie Mae is operating with its own best interests in mind, as doing so clearly has generated results. It's that Fannie is completely open to the reality that it simply doesn't care about its common shareholders, which is what you are when you buy into the company.

The following are all quotes from its most recent annual report:

"Because we are in conservatorship, we are no longer managed with a strategy to maximize shareholder returns."

"[E]very dollar of earnings that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac generate will be used to benefit taxpayers for their investment in those firms."

"The conservatorship and investment by Treasury have had, and will continue to have, a material adverse effect on our common and preferred shareholders."

"The future of our company is uncertain."

It is not only open about its position of not operating with the best interests of the shareholders in mind. It is, in fact, adamant about it. Although many have sought to change this course of action, the federal government and those at Fannie Mae have given no indication that it will happen at all, much less anytime soon.

When you buy stock in a company, you're hoping that those directing the company will see to maximizing your return. But when you buy stock in Fannie Mae, you're willingly putting your money behind a company that plainly assures you it will not.

One stock worth buying
The market stormed out to huge gains across 2013, leaving investors on the sidelines burned. However, opportunistic investors can still find huge winners. The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has just hand-picked one such opportunity in our new report: "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2014." To find out which stock it is and read our in-depth report, simply click here. It's free!


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 01, 2013, at 6:47 PM, Caludio wrote:

    To Patric Morris

    Had the company not been in conservatorship the price would be already $ 50.

    Fannie is selling at an extraordinary discount. You see the conservatorship as a problem, other people see it as a great opprtunity to make money

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2745525, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/27/2014 5:14:07 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement