Why You Shouldn’t Buy Campbell Soup

The global baked food industry is expected to be worth in excess of $310 billion by the end of 2015. In addition, the market for soups, sauces, and dressings is estimated to grow at a rate of 2.1% per year to reach $331 billion by 2015. Hectic lifestyles that leave less time to cook meals the conventional way drive demand for baked goods, soups, and sauces. This is why Campbell Soup (NYSE: CPB  ) should ideally perform well, but this hasn't been the case so far.

Campbell failed to capitalize on the growth trends above and started its fiscal 2014 on a very bad note. Its first-quarter results reminded me of Murphy's Law -- anything that can go wrong, will go wrong – and it's no surprise that the CEO had to start the earnings call with "I'm disappointed with our first quarter results."

Getting it wrong
Campbell's organic sales declined 4%, which led to an overall sales decline of 2% from the same quarter last year. Adjusted earnings from continuing operations declined a sharp 21% versus the year-ago quarter to $0.66 per share.

The negative impact of movement in retailer inventory levels due to a late Thanksgiving holiday was one of the main reasons behind such lackluster results. In addition, other factors such as weakness in the core business, the voluntary recall of a range of Plum Organics pouch products, and marketing investments to support new products and build the Bolthouse Farms brand compounded the problems.

Going forward, Campbell considers its three acquisitions -- Bolthouse Farms, Plum Organics, and Kelsen – new growth drivers with combined sales of more than $1 billion. In addition, Campbell has also focused on cost reductions. Initiatives undertaken in the first quarter are expected to deliver annualized cost savings of approximately $40 million.

There were positive takeaways from the first quarter. The global baking and snacking segment's sales increased 6% to $609 million, primarily due to the Kelsen Group acquisition. However, this wasn't enough to offset the negativity that arose from other segments.

Campbell lowered its guidance for fiscal 2014 and this spooked investors. This reduced guidance indicates that Campbell still lacks confidence about its turnaround plans. In addition, share buybacks remain suspended in order to reduce the debt incurred to finance the Bolthouse acquisition. Considering these factors, it is no surprise that Campbell has dropped 15% in the last six months and it might continue to suffer until and unless it executes its strategies in a better way.

General Mills and Flowers Foods are doing much better
General Mills (NYSE: GIS  ) and Flowers Foods (NYSE: FLO  ) haven't been struggling due to retailer inventory issues, probably because their inventory management has been better.

General Mills started fiscal 2014 on a strong note. In the first quarter, General Mills reported an 8% increase in revenue from last year to $4.37 billion. It also reported 6% year-over-year growth in earnings to $0.70 per share, in line with expectations.

General Mills has also found success in international markets. On the back of international acquisitions, the company experienced a 27% year-over-year increase in international sales to $1 billion in the first quarter of 2014. General Mills is enjoying growth from different quarters while Campbell is finding such growth hard to come by.

Flowers Foods also reported robust results for the third quarter. It achieved a 22.5% increase in sales and a 6% increase in earnings per share from the year ago period, primarily driven by acquisitions.

Flowers Foods thrives on acquisitions. In the third quarter, Flowers Foods acquired a bakery in Modesto, California. Earlier this year, it acquired the facilities and brands of Hostess in a deal worth $355 million. Flowers Foods' U.S. market share now stands at 14% and market share in its core markets of the Southeast and Southwest has risen to 30% as a result of acquisitions. More importantly, despite growing via acquisitions, Flowers Foods' total debt-to-equity ratio of 92 is much lower than Campbell's 329.4.

Bottom line
Campbell isn't executing well even though it operates in a growing market. In comparison, its peers have performed quite well. Also, at a trailing P/E of 32, Campbell is quite expensive compared to General Mills and Flowers Foods which both trade at around 20 times earnings. Hence, considering Campbell's rich valuation and its weak performance, it is a stock to stay away from.

There's one stock that the Fool doesn't think you should stay away from
The market stormed out to huge gains across 2013, leaving investors on the sidelines burned. However, opportunistic investors can still find huge winners. The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has just hand-picked one such opportunity in our new report: "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2014." To find out which stock it is and read our in-depth report, simply click here. It's free!


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 05, 2013, at 8:41 AM, JoeB9936 wrote:

    Do you folks at the Fool know what you are doing. Two days ago you posted an article that recommended CPB as an investment for the long haul, today you are trashing them and recommending not to buy. This is one of many reasons I do not use you for investment decisions. I would have lost a bundle on your wishy-washy recommendations.

  • Report this Comment On December 05, 2013, at 9:39 AM, pondee619 wrote:

    JoeB9936:

    Many readers here, myself included, have voiced your concern. Once someone from "The Motley Fool" decides to answer (should you actually get a response) you will be told that, not withstanding the title at the top of this page, "The Motley Fool", this site in a mess of many fools who spout different (frequently opposing) views about all subjects. There is no "Fool" but rather a plethera of fools submitting opposing views, opinions, and facts about everything. If you have an opiniion, and want verification of same, look here. You will find it. All opinions are covered and voiced (voiced, often, as a recommendation, as here "Why You Shouldn’t Buy Campbell Soup" and "The best companies to own are those that are able to compound shareholder value at a high rate over many years. Hershey (NYSE: HSY ) , Campbell Soup (NYSE: CPB ) , and Sysco (NYSE: SYY ) are three such companies. http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/11/30/3-high-qual....

    If you are looking for some solid investing advice, go elsewhere. "The Motley Fool" will contradict itself shortly. If you are looking for both/all sides of an investing idea, this isn't a bad place to look. Just remember, you are not getting anything solid upon which to bank, but just one viewpoint which will be contradicted shortly or contradicts a recently offered recommendation. This really isn't "The Motley Fool" it is more like The Motley Fools. Sort through the cacophony and make your own decision.

    Joe, you pays your money and you makes your choices. This site does not recommend stocks (they may say they do, but they don't). This site offers up many differing opinions, maybe to confuse, maybe to Educate, Amuse and Enrich, maybe just to try to sell subscriptions to their many "Services". Don't rely one one article. Good luck and Merry Christmas.

  • Report this Comment On December 06, 2013, at 2:49 PM, JoeB9936 wrote:

    The idiots at Motley Fool strike again. Monday CPB is a buy for your long term portfolio and yesterday an article about why you should not buy CPB. Today CPB is up $2 a share. Keep trashing CPB and maybe it will increase a few more dollars. This website is a lost as the stock market is in general. Find another thing to report on, Fool, as financials are not your strong point.

  • Report this Comment On December 19, 2013, at 8:32 AM, twcooper wrote:

    The editorial and newsletter businesses are completely separate at the Fool. Editorial (the free articles) is like Seeking Alpha -- it's a bunch of different contributors giving their own opinion. The newsletters, however, maintain a consistent and coherent stance on the stocks they recommend. In other words, a newsletter would never recommend a stock one month and then tell you why you shouldn't even think of buying that stock the next month.

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2753204, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/17/2014 2:57:36 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement