New Commodity Trading Rules Good for Big Oil

This article was written by Oilprice.com, the leading provider of energy news in the world.

The move by banking and securities regulators to ban proprietary trading at financial institutions could put an end to Wall Street's dominance in the commodity hedging game, giving greater advantage to oil majors, but make it difficult for smaller oil and gas producers to lock in future prices to mitigate risk, industry experts say.

The tougher trading regulations, known as the Volcker Rule, were finalized on Dec. 10 by banking and securities regulatory agencies and will prohibit proprietary trading by banks with the end goal of drawing a line in the sand between commercial banking and investment banking.  

The Volcker Rule, implemented in the wake of the financial crisis and named after former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, is being viewed by some as a major coup in commodities trading for non-banks, including oil majors and commodity trading houses.

The new rules should be favorable for oil majors and large trading houses because the Volcker Rule does not apply to them, according to Risknet.com.

On the new commodities playing field, experts are predicting that we will see more hedging with oil giants and major trading houses like Vitol.

At the same time, small and medium-sized oil and gas producers could take a hit.  

"The Volcker Rule isn't a frontal attack on exploration and production companies, but the secondary effects could make it much more expensive and restrictive for them to enter into these financial instruments," the Houston Chronicle quoted Ernie Lachica, a Houston-based principal of UHY LLP who specializes in hedging and trading, as saying. "It could put constraints on the overall energy industry."

The end result could be higher costs and less liquidity for smaller producers, he said.

While banks may have been wrong-footed in the deal, they were already inching out of commodities trading before the Dec. 10 decision. According to earlier media reports, on Dec. 5, Deutsche Bank said it would downsize its commodities trading due to expected regulatory changes, and earlier in July JPMorgan Chase announced plans to spin off its physical commodities trading, while Morgan Stanley is also said to be considering pulling back a bit.

Could this bring down OPEC
Imagine a company that rents a very specific and valuable piece of machinery for $41,000... per hour (that's almost as much as the average American makes in a year!). And Warren Buffett is so confident in this company's can't-live-without-it business model, he just loaded up on 8.8 million shares. An exclusive, brand-new Motley Fool report reveals the company we're calling OPEC's Worst Nightmare. Just click HERE to uncover the name of this industry-leading stock... and join Buffett in his quest for a veritable LANDSLIDE of profits!

 

Related article: 3 Never-Seen Events That Mean Big Changes For Oil Investing

Related article: Energy Secretary Signals Support for Revisiting U.S. Crude Export Ban


Read/Post Comments (0) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

DocumentId: 2772705, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/21/2014 3:24:22 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement