Is Now the Time to Bail on Martha Stewart?

Last Friday, shares of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (NYSE: MSO  ) shot up 18.35% to close at $3.87. This was followed by a 1.29% increase on Monday. The share price appreciation came about after the company's new CEO, Daniel Dienst, announced that he was laying off about 75 employees. The bold move, which illustrates the company's dedication to reducing expenses, will help lower next year's costs by an estimated $10 million. Does this news present the Foolish investor with an amazing opportunity to buy into a turnaround, or would you be better off taking the profits you have?

Martha Stewart's results have been anything but beautiful
To put this move into perspective, we should look at the recent performance of the company. Looking back five years, we can see that revenue has suffered significantly. Between 2008 and 2012, revenue at the media conglomerate fell 30.5% from $284.3 million to $197.6 million. This trend has extended into the company's 2013 fiscal year, with revenue falling 22.3% in its third quarter compared to the same quarter a year ago.

The primary drivers behind Martha Stewart's revenue decline over this timeframe have been two-fold. First, sales in its broadcasting segment fell 63% from $47.3 million to $17.5 million. From 2011 to 2012, the 45% drop in revenue for this segment came from lower advertising and licensing revenue, mostly associated with fewer television integrations and the conclusion of The Martha Stewart Show.

Second, revenue from the company's far-larger publishing segment dropped 25.1% from $163.5 million to $122.5 million. Like the broadcasting segment, the publishing segment saw its greatest decline (13%) from 2011 to 2012. The sharp decline stemmed from a combination of fewer advertising dollars and lower rates on subscriptions.

The revenue decline over the past few years has brought with it a similarly large decline in profitability. Between 2008 and 2012, net income for the conglomerate fell from -$15.7 million to -$56.1 million. In addition to lower revenue, higher costs as a percentage of sales have significantly impaired the company's fundamentals.

Legal woes
Putting aside profitability for a moment, we stumble upon another piece of bad news for shareholders; lawsuits. Recently, the company went through a legal dispute involving its alleged breach of contract with Macy's (NYSE: M  ) . In 2011, Martha Stewart and J.C. Penney Company (NYSE: JCP  ) agreed to sell certain products (both name-brand and under the Everyday name by J.C. Penney) through the retailer's store-within-a-store setup.

The deal between J.C. Penney and Martha Stewart was expected to last 10 years and projected to bring in at least $200 million in revenue for Martha Stewart in exchange for a stake in the company. In response to the deal, Macy's, which has the rights to the Martha Stewart Collection, filed a suit alleging that the company breached its exclusivity rights and that J.C. Penney encouraged the breach.

After a lengthy trial, J.C. Penney agreed to sell back its stake in Martha Stewart and significantly reduced its involvement with the company. Though this seems to indicate that troubles involving Martha Stewart are over, it's possible that Macy's, which is the conglomerate's largest customer, could eventually cease its relationship, a move that could spell the end for Martha Stewart. With the company generating around $250 million in revenue for Macy's in 2012 alone, it's doubtful that their relationship will end anytime soon, but the risk is there in the long run.

Foolish takeaway
As you can see, the situation at Martha Stewart is poor and getting worse. In addition to seeing revenue fall drastically over the past five years, the company has continuously been hit with net losses. Add to this the risk of a major deal going south, like the one it has with Macy's, and the risks are omnipresent.

To address these concerns, management is probably right in finding ways to cut costs, but it's unlikely that a $10 million reduction in employee expenses will have a large enough impact to justify such a tremendous jump in market cap. Instead of spelling the beginning of more prosperous times as the corporation trims away at what it considers unneeded resources, the move might be a sign of management's last desperate attempt to plug a hole on a quickly sinking ship.

What would Buffett do?
Warren Buffett has made billions through his investing and he wants you to be able to invest like him. Through the years, Buffett has offered up investing tips to shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway. Now you can tap into the best of Warren Buffett's wisdom in a new special report from The Motley Fool. Click here now for a free copy of this invaluable report.


Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 22, 2013, at 7:49 AM, gchu11 wrote:

    It is now the time for readers and subscribers to bail on The Motley Fool.

    The continuous distortions and misrepresentations on MSLO indicate nothing written by the Motley Fool on any company is reliable investment information. This bashing agenda of the Motley Fool on MSLO indicates the Motley Fool is a dubious, "snake oil" investment source.

    Masquerading as investment advice, the Motley's fly-by-night fools are in a jeering game on the company.

    Unlike the Motley Fool, the Martha Stewart brand is a quality established American brand. There is nothing that can "spell the end for Martha Stewart."

  • Report this Comment On December 22, 2013, at 7:02 PM, BuffettJr89 wrote:

    Hello gchu11! Thank you very much for reading my article. I'm sorry you disagree with my thesis, but I believe the company's operating history speaks for itself. However, I've been wrong about investments before so it's not out of the question for the company to perform better and skyrocket. But if fundamentals mean anything, this is highly questionable.

  • Report this Comment On December 23, 2013, at 11:33 PM, gchu11 wrote:

    The "company's operating history speaks for itself" is nonsense. Jones is speaking for the "company's operating history" and "fundamentals" with cockeyed spin emanating from the Motley Fool's trashing agenda on the company. "I believe" is no basis for any investment advice for gullible investors.

    Reflecting the strength of Martha Stewart's mantra, you're done when you're through changing, MSLO is poised to skyrocket with a solid, iconic brand in a free market economy with no interference from SEC overreach or otherwise. "Highly questionable" is a brand of "snake oil" from the Motley Fool.

  • Report this Comment On December 24, 2013, at 12:14 AM, BuffettJr89 wrote:

    Thank you again for your response, gchu11! I do appreciate any input you have. However, I must say that I am not informed by The Motley Fool to either trash or promote any given company. Rather, I am encouraged to write what I believe investors would like to know about anything I want. It is entirely possible that my thesis is wrong on Martha Stewart and I pray for its investor's sake that I am.

    However, continuously declining revenue and a continuously increasing net loss is certainly detrimental to the company and its shareholders. In the event that its fundamentals improve, I will have no problem getting behind the company and speaking positively of its prospects. Unfortunately, I haven't seen anything to this effect yet though I do keep a constant eye on it for signs of a turnaround. I wish you Happy Holidays!

  • Report this Comment On December 24, 2013, at 3:32 AM, gchu11 wrote:

    Ralph Lauren Corp., which "designs, markets and sells," closed yesterday at $174.87. MSLO will certainly be trading at this range in the future with its iconic brand.

    It is a distortion and misrepresentation to spin "continuously declining revenue and a continuously increasing net loss" on the company's changed business model in different circumstances. This strength repudiates "certainly detrimental to the company and its shareholders."

    The Motley Fool has a longstanding hostile agenda on MSLO, so it hosted a "thesis" not inconsistent with its established jeering.

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2774047, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/20/2014 4:50:42 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement