Which Pay-TV Provider Has the Most Upside for 2014?

On the surface, DISH and DIRECTV look identical, but with Disney negotiations occurring and a closer look at growth/valuation, a clear winner for upside potential emerges.

Jan 4, 2014 at 1:00PM

DIRECTV (NASDAQ:DTV) and DISH Network (NASDAQ:DISH) are unquestioned competitors, both solidified as pay-TV leaders. Over the last five years, both have been tremendous investments, but looking ahead to 2014, which will prove to be the best investment?

What's the difference?
DISH is most certainly the market's favorite of the two companies. In five years it has rallied a whopping 440%, including 63% in 2013. DIRECTV's five-year 230% and one-year 40% returns are impressive, but much more modest.

The two companies have very different approaches. DISH is flashy, led by a charismatic chairman, Charlie Ergen, who has taken advantage of historically low interest rates to raise debt, finance high-profile acquisitions, and pursue mergers.

While DISH was able to acquire Blockbuster in bankruptcy, a proposed merger with DIRECTV and acquisition attempts of both Sprint and Clearwire were a failure by Ergen. However, in 2013, it was speculation and the attempted acquisitions that helped to produce such large gains. Even today we're seeing DISH soar higher on the prospects of a T-Mobile acquisition, which is yet to materialize.

DIRECTV is much quieter, producing under-the-radar growth and continuing to penetrate Latin America as an upside opportunity.

Sports will be most watched in 2014
Looking ahead, 2014 will be an important year for both DISH and DIRECTV, one that investors will watch closely.

DISH must reach an agreement with Walt Disney's (NYSE:DIS) ESPN, which is one of the fastest-growing networks in the country.

Forbes estimates that ESPN is worth $40 billion, and this despite many of its large contracts with pay-TV providers not having been renewed in several years. However, in 2014, DISH and Disney will enter aggressive negotiations for a deal that could both affect margins for DISH and produce further growth for Disney.

Particularly, some analysts estimate that carriage fees could rise from a current industry-high $5.54 per subscriber to $7.65. This will be a closely watched development for DISH, and depending on the outcome could drastically increase the value of ESPN. Hence, Disney could have yet another good year with increased margins on ESPN.

DIRECTV is still under a 10-year contract with ESPN that was signed in 2005, meaning that bridge won't be crossed in the immediate future. However, 2014 will be the year of NFL negotiations.

In December, Bloomberg reported that DIRECTV and the NFL were nearing a contract for rights to Sunday Ticket. The current four-year, $4 billion contract expires at the end of 2014.

Sunday Ticket has been a growth driver for DIRECTV, and it's very important that DIRECTV completes a new deal quickly, as rumors that online-streaming providers (possibly Netflix) are interested in acquiring rights to the service.

Clearly, both DISH and DIRECTV will have to negotiate new contracts with ESPN and the NFL, respectively, giving both a catalyst and also a potential risk. But as an investor, you almost have to like that DIRECTV is "nearing a contract" for rights to Sunday Ticket, while DISH is expected to negotiate aggressively with ESPN, thus creating an overhang. Moreover, when you consider DISH's prior programming issues with AMC, threatening to remove The Walking Dead from DISH subscribers, investors have to believe that the ESPN/DISH ordeal could linger.

Will 2014 be a good year?
While increased programming costs have been a hot topic throughout the pay-TV industry, both DISH and DIRECTV look poised for rather strong years.

Of the 24 analysts who cover DISH, the consensus is for expectations of 2.7% sales growth in 2014. Yet, due to expansion in Latin America and continued new subscription growth, DIRECTV is actually expected to grow faster, at 5.6% year over year.

Moreover, DIRECTV is expected to outperform DISH in growth despite less of a price hike. Reportedly , DIRECTV will increase the price of its base packages by 4.4% versus 5.5% for DISH, thus making DIRECTV's growth even more impressive.

Lastly, if we want to incorporate 2013, investors should also note that DIRECTV is coming off a year with 6.4% growth compared to just 0.7% growth for DISH.

With all things considered, it seems that DIRECTV is a better-performing company, and not to mention, in an industry where margins are expected to be pressured due to increased programming costs, DIRECTV is guiding for 15% annual earnings-per-share growth for the next two years.

Where's the value?
Now, for the real value clincher: DISH trades at 1.8 times sales and 30 times next year's earnings; DIRECTV trades at just 1.1 times sales and 12 times forward earnings. Investors might wonder how this is possible, especially considering DIRECTV's superior growth. Honestly, there's no real explanation.

Perhaps the premium placed on DISH is a result of its acquisition attempts over the last year, and the upside speculation it created. For the most part, DISH's stock never came down after these attempts failed to materialize. As a result, this has left a massive disconnect between the fundamental performance and valuation of these two companies.

Essentially, DISH has become the investment favorite due to speculation, while DIRECTV has quietly been producing industry-best growth. For investors, the real upside value is apparent: DIRECTV has the most to gain, the least to lose, and is poised to be the better-performing company for 2014. 

Profit from the changing TV landscape
Television, as we know it, is on the verge of a transformation. The companies that prevail in this epic disruption could go on to earn their shareholders untold sums of money. And the companies that lose could very well end up in bankruptcy court within a matter of years. With this in mind, our top technology analysts created a groundbreaking free report that sorts out the likely winners from the losers. In doing so, they reveal the handful of companies that are best positioned to make their shareholders exceptionally rich over the next few decades. To download this invaluable free report before the rest of the market catches on, simply click here now.


Fool contributor Brian Nichols has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends AMC Networks, DirecTV, Netflix, and Walt Disney. The Motley Fool owns shares of Netflix and Walt Disney. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information