Merck & Co., Inc. Cutting Its Losses, While Others Charge Toward RNAi

Merck calls it quits on a billion-dollar investment that was supposed to recharge its pipeline

Jan 13, 2014 at 6:30PM

Sometimes success in business requires the ability to make decisions and zig while others are zagging. It is also important to know when to stop throwing good money after bad and call it a day. I believe those two bromides may offer some explanation for why Merck (NYSE:MRK) agreed to sell its Sirna assets to Alnylam Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:ALNY) for a small fraction of their purchase price at a time when others like Sanofi (NYSE:SNY) and Roche (NASDAQOTH:RHHBY) are increasing their spending and commitment to the space.

A Billion-Dollar Experiment Gone Bad

Merck spent $1.1 billion to acquire Sirna in 2006 amid booming enthusiasm for RNAi to be "the next big thing" in biotech and pharmaceutical development. While Sirna had a couple of early stage clinical programs at the time (one for wet AMD and a respiratory disease collaboration with GlaxoSmithKline, the real attraction was the IP that Sirna brought to the table, particularly in delivery technologies.

Unfortunately, Merck has managed to do next to nothing with the Sirna in the intervening years. That wet AMD drug flamed out and Merck couldn't seem to crack the code on how to develop promising RNAi-based therapies. Merck significantly pared back its RNAi efforts in 2011, but now the company is getting out almost completely.

Alnylam is acquiring Sirna for $175 million, and only $25 million of that is in cash. Merck will be entitled to $105 million in milestones and single-digit royalties, but those are not likely to ever reverse a large loss on that initial Sirna acquisition. Alnylam is likely to benefit most from Sirna's siRNA conjugate technology for RNAi delivery, technology that should expand and build upon its own GalNAc delivery technology to offer more formulation options.

A Familiar Problem

I am not going to pummel Merck over their missteps with Sirna and RNAi. Merck did this deal when enthusiasm over RNAi was at its peak, and rumors were everywhere that Alnylam and Roche were about to sign a major partnership (which proved true). What's more, there is still a very real chance that RNAi will become a significant platform technology that generates multiple billion-dollar drugs for biotech and pharma companies.

The problem is that RNAi is very tricky. Isis Pharmaceuticals has been working on antisense for the better part of two decades and has two approvals to show for it. Delivering RNAi-based therapeutics has proven to be particularly challenging, and Merck is just one of many who hasn't managed to crack the code. With that, I'd note that Roche backed out of its partnership with Alnylam in late 2010 and Novartis chose not to expand its partnership in 2010 and has yet to do much of anything with the early stage compounds it identified.

Zigging While Others Zag

Investors will notice that Merck is exiting RNAi at the same time that others are stepping up. Almost simultaneous with the announcement of Alnylam's acquisition of Sirna, the company also announced a major investment and partnership with Sanofi. Roche too has come back to the market, partnering with Isis on a Huntington's disease compound and crafting a partnership with Santaris to gain access to its LNA (locked nucleic acid) platform. Last and not least, Monsanto, which also works with Alnylam, just announced a partnership with Tekmira for RNAi delivery technology.

Readers can also take note of the coming IPO of Dicerna Pharmaceuticals as a comment on the renewed enthusiasm for RNAi therapies.

The Bottom Line

It is not as though Merck is going off to sulk. Merck has been committing considerable resources to its onco-immunology pipeline and there is nothing wrong with a company realizing that it cannot explore every potentially interesting line of drug research. It will definitely sting if Alnylam is able to take Sirna's technology and leverage it into billion-dollar drugs, but Merck had nearly seven years and could do virtually nothing with the technology. At this point, getting $175 million in value for the technology through sale is the best chance of Merck getting value out of the Sirna assets.

For Alnylam, I believe this could be a savvy deal. Sirna holds valuable intellectual property, and I suspect that patent battles are going to heat up again now that multiple drug companies are looking at the RNAi space. Should Sirna also improve the company's options for RNAi delivery, so much the better for Alnylam and its shareholders.

More game-changing biotech stocks to watch now

The best way to play the biotech space is to find companies that shun the status quo and instead discover revolutionary, groundbreaking technologies. In the Motley Fool's brand-new FREE report "2 Game-Changing Biotechs Revolutionizing the Way We Treat Cancer," find out about a new technology that big pharma is endorsing through partnerships, and the two companies that are set to profit from this emerging drug class. Click here to get your copy today.

Stephen D. Simpson, CFA owns shares of Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Roche, and Monsanto. The Motley Fool recommends Alnylam Pharmaceuticals and Isis Pharmaceuticals. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information