A Hidden Positive in Apple’s Cash Plan

Beyond Apple’s cash controversy, investors can ponder another strategic plus.

Feb 10, 2014 at 4:15PM

Last week, Apple's (NASDAQ:AAPL) Tim Cook announced spending $14 billion in stock buybacks. It's been an interesting development since so many have been rallying against Apple's stockpiling of cash, particularly vocal agitator and major shareholder Carl Icahn.

Today, Icahn revealed in a letter to fellow shareholders that his concerns about the large treasure trove have been alleviated given the news. He feels even more bullish about the tech giant's long-term prognosis.

Major shareholders -- and individual investors, too -- have had differing opinions on the cash controversy. Still, there's an important takeaway that's mostly overlooked, and that has to do with shareholder treatment and corporate governance, given Apple's previous weaknesses in those areas.

Megaphone matches
Over the weekend, we learned that well-respected proxy advisory firm Institutional Shareholder Services, or ISS, advised shareholders to vote against Icahn's proposal that Apple open up its ironclad wallet. It joined in the sentiment with CalPERS, the biggest pension fund in the U.S. and an influential voice for solid corporate governance.

According to ISS, "The board's latitude should not be constricted by a shareholder resolution that would micromanage the company's capital allocation process."

A representative from CalPERS, or the California Public Employees' Retirement System, had strongly rebutted Icahn's stance in a more colorful manner:

There are owners, raiders, and traders. We're an owner and have been of Apple for a very long time. Mr. Icahn is a raider and he's an echo chamber who engages in megaphone diplomacy.

In this case, its point was basically megaphone vs. megaphone given its massive size.

Actually, this is about cash and corporate governance
The takeaway is that after a long history of not listening to shareholders and having shoddy corporate governance principles, Apple's management and board of directors may be starting to listen.

Steve Jobs' reign didn't give credence to dissenting voices of any kind. Of course Jobs had incredible vision, and it was executed beautifully to build a great company. However, the tight ship he ran did not include ceding to others' ideas. It seems the attitude infiltrated the board.

For example, Apple's board didn't alert shareholders to Steve Jobs' illness. Of course investors don't need notification every time such a key figure catches a cold, but succession planning is often a very real concern. Jobs' health and ability to lead the company was a very real concern.

Meanwhile, one well-respected Apple director's feedback -- critical as it was – wasn't appreciated.

The late Jerome York faced frustration on Apple's board given failure to disclose Jobs' serious health issue early. That's disturbing because boards of directors are supposed to criticize management when it has to do with shareholders' best interests. York was an example of a director doing exactly what directors are supposed to do.

York's frustration for being a lone voice in the wilderness wasn't limited to Apple. He had previously resigned from the board at General Motors (NYSE:GM) due to that company's tin ear when it came to his feedback. GM ended up needing a government bailout. A tone-deaf board could very well have contributed to GM's problems.

To ISS's credit, it may have disagreed with the decision but it did give credit to Apple for making a "good-faith effort" to listen more strongly to the real owners of public companies -- shareholders.

Still, I came down on the side of keeping the cash before the announcement. In addition, I strongly felt Apple was a buy at the price and that the recent quarter simply wasn't the end of the world.

I found Cook's Wall Street Journal quote telling when Cook announced the shareholder-assuaging buybacks.

He said the plan had been to:

adjust for the long-term interest of the shareholders, not for the short-term shareholder, not for the day trader. We may see a huge company tomorrow that we want to acquire or something may happen in the stock market that's unpredictable... We've looked at big companies. We have no problem spending 10 figures for the right company, for the right fit that's in the best interest of Apple in the long-term. None. Zero.

The art of listening
Long-term investors should appreciate that Apple is flush with cash. They should also be grateful that Cook hasn't thrown money around on large acquisitions that likely won't provide as much value as investors think they will. Many acquisitions simply don't.

Along those lines, Google (NASDAQ:GOOGL), another cash-rich tech giant, is far more aggressive about frenetic acquisitions. Take its $3.2 billion price tag for Nest, nearly $1 billion for Waze, and of course, $12.5 billion for Motorola Mobility.

Google shareholders should be thankful that it can afford to take some massive hits on failed acquisitions. It's selling Motorola Mobility to Lenovo for $2.9 billion. Google sold off parts of Motorola Mobility and kept Motorola's patent chest, but the deal ended up costing Google dearly.

Regardless, though, Apple is strong enough and does have enough cash to make this a win-win. And, possibly most interesting and strategic of all, maybe Apple's management and board are finally open to listening.

Check back at Fool.com for more of Alyce Lomax's columns on environmental, social, and governance issues.

Alyce Lomax has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Apple, General Motors, and Google. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple and Google. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information

Compare Brokers