Can These 2 Health Care Giants Overcome Big Pharma's Alzheimer's Struggles?

Alzheimer's has been one of the trickiest diseases for big pharma to develop drugs for lately, but Merck and AstraZeneca are pushing into late-stage trials with two high-potential drugs.

Feb 17, 2014 at 2:30PM

Alzheimer's disease is one of the most prolific and costliest afflictions in the U.S. According to the Alzheimer's Association, more than 5 million Americans alone suffer from the ailment, which is expected to cost the U.S. more than $1 trillion by 2050. Despite the size of the problem, top drugmakers have struggled to develop treatments for Alzheimer's as of late.

Big Pharma's Eli Lilly raised eyebrows across the health care sector last year when it cut its development of phase 2 BACE inhibitor LY2886721. Swiss rival Roche also cut developmental of a similar drug, BACE inhibitor RG7129, which was in early-stage trials, and many more Alzheimer's disease therapies have been cut during clinical development over the past decade and a half.

That's not stopping Merck (NYSE:MRK) and AstraZeneca (NYSE:AZN), however, as these two leading big pharma giants are making headway on Alzheimer's treatments via mid- to late-stage studies. But can these two companies succeed where so many others have failed in what could be a huge market for investors?

Merck and AstraZeneca battle against history
Merck has taken center stage in the race to develop the promising BACE inhibitors, a type of drug that combats one of Alzheimer's top causes by blocking a certain enzyme that contributes to generating a specific kind of brain plaque-causing protein. Merck got the jump on its competition last December, when it announced it would proceed with a pair of phase 3 trials for its Alzheimer's-fighting candidate MK-8931.

Considering the trouble Alzheimer's drug research has had in the past, it's wise for investors to keep watch with a cautious eye. However, should Merck beat the odds, this drug could be among the company's biggest pipeline successes. Analysts have pegged MK-8931 as a potential $5 billion-a-year drug if it can hurdle years of Alzheimer's failures across the industry. That's a critically needed piece of potential for Merck's R&D department, which has been hampered by criticism over spending and a lack of successful discoveries in the recent past.

But Merck now has company in its late-stage push. Late last week, AstraZeneca announced alongside its earnings report that it will launch its own BACE inhibitor, AZD3293, into combined phase 2/3 trials of its own. Data will be a long time off -- Merck is ahead of AstraZeneca so far, and AstraZeneca doesn't expect data until 2017 at the earliest -- but for AstraZeneca, the possibility of hitting on blockbuster potential is too good to pass up. Analysts project that AZD3293, if successful, could reach or exceed $1 billion in annual sales.

It's one glimmer of hope in what has been a disappointing run for AstraZeneca so far. The firm's full-year revenue in 2013 fell 6% at a constant currency, and the company said that it expects 2014 sales to fall by single-digit percentages as well. Even by 2017, AstraZeneca only expects revenue roughly in line with 2013's figures. That makes projects such as AZD3293 all the more critical to overcome the likes of the patent cliff's challenges, even with the high failure rate of Alzheimer's candidates lately.

Merck's MK-8931 has claimed leadership in the race so far by overcoming the safety fears that downed Eli Lilly's BACE inhibitor last summer. Lilly's drug failed over fears of liver toxicity, and while the company noted that the class of drugs wasn't to blame for the failure, all eyes will be fixed on safety data from Merck and AstraZeneca's trials down the road, despite their early successes.

Setting sights on the long term
There's still a long way to go before MK-8931 or AZD3293 will see the light of day from regulators, but long-term investors in both Merck and AstraZeneca need to keep a close eye on the progress of these high-potential drugs. Both firms have borne R&D failures and costly patent losses as of late, and the promise of billions of dollars of sales a year from fighting Alzheimer's is too important to ignore -- even if recent history has resulted in disappointment after disappointment from some of Big Pharma's biggest names. If Merck or AstraZeneca come through in the battle against Alzheimer's, patient investors today will be poised to win big down the road.

How Merck and other top dividend stocks can revolutionize your financial future
Big pharma stocks like Merck have emerged as some of the top picks for long-term investors who embrace the financial power of dividends. One of the dirty secrets that few finance professionals will openly admit is the fact that dividend stocks as a group handily outperform their non-dividend-paying brethren. However, knowing this is only half the battle. The other half is identifying which dividend stocks in particular are the best. With this in mind, our top analysts put together a free list of nine high-yielding stocks that should be in every income investor's portfolio. To learn the identity of these stocks instantly and for free, all you have to do is click here now.

Dan Carroll has no position in any stocks mentioned, and neither does The Motley Fool. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information