Is the NHL the Next Big Sports Property?

While the National Hockey League has always been a decided #4 when it comes to the big four U.S. sports leagues, it might be finally poised to take off.

Feb 19, 2014 at 1:11PM

The National Hockey League's audience may be tiny compared to the National Football League, Major League Baseball, and the National Basketball Association, but the NHL may finally be ready to take a seat at the grownups' table.

Despite a lockout-shortened season in 2013, the league saw its viewership increase 20% over the prior season, according to Nielsen's 2013 Year in Sports Media Report. Not only is its audience growing, the NHL boasts an increasingly lucrative audience, according to Nielsen -- 53% of viewers for nationally televised regular season NHL games in 2013 came from households earning more than $75,000 a year, compared to only 27% of its audience 10 seasons ago.

Advertisers are noticing too as the league's top five 2012-2013 advertisers included top brands Discover Credit Card, Geico Auto Insurance, Subway, and Coors Light.

New TV deals

As I wrote in "Which Sport Has The Richest Fans? The Answer Will Surprise You," the NHL has a  U.S. TV deal with Comcast's (NASDAQ:CMCSK) NBC Sports Network worth around $200 million a year, which runs through 2021. In Canada, the league has a 12-year, $5.2 billion deal with Rogers Sportsnet (roughly $430 million a year), which begins with the 2014-2015 season.

Since the implementation of the salary cap during the 2005-2006 season, it has risen from around $39 million per team to over $70 million in the 2012-2013 season. The cap number actually fell in 2013-14, but that was due not to declining revenues, but to a newly negotiated collective bargaining agreement between the league and the NHL Players Association, which changed how revenue was split between teams and players.

$4 billion in revenue

The NHL made a record $3.3 billion in revenue during its last full season (2011-12) and NHL Chief Operating Officer John Collins laid out a plan to the league's board of governors that would see revenue increase to $4 billion within three years. That plan was before the Canadian TV deal.

"We thought it was ambitious at the time," Collins said in an NHL press release, "but maybe we undershot, maybe we'll do that a little sooner."

The deal with Rogers should allow the league to boost the salary cap from its current $64.3 million starting with the 2014-15 season.

"Over the course of 12 years, it provides a lot of economic certainty for the clubs and, ultimately, for the cap," Collins said. "Fifty cents of every dollar goes into the player salaries, so this is a significant increase and it certainly helps us get to the $4 billion goal."

The NHL audience is growing

Regular season viewing grew 19% in the 2012-2013 season, according to Nielsen. Better yet, the audience for the Stanley Cup Finals blew up, growing from 3 million in 2012 to to 5.8 million in 2013 -- a 91% increase in the U.S.

One of the reasons for the increase may well be that technology finally is catching up to make watching hockey on TV a good experience. Prior to HDTV becoming the norm in American homes, the complaint about hockey was always that it was hard to follow the small, black puck on TV. When it held hockey rights, Fox tried the FoxTrax glowing puck, which was widely ridiculed.

But now 75% of American households own at least one HDTV, according to Leichtman Research group, as reported in April 2013 by HDTV Review. That number is up from 52% in 2008. Basically, the same HDTV technology that exposes every previously hidden wrinkle on your local newscaster makes hockey on TV a much better experience even for casual or new fans.

The value of sports rights is growing

While the NHL won't be able to make a new TV deal in the United States until 2021 and won't be free to do the same in Canada until 2027, the current deals -- especially the U.S. deal -- should continue to grow. The Hollywood Reporter reported that, according to a report by Deloitte, in 2014 global sports rights will have brought in $26 billion, a 14% increase. "This compares to an average annual growth of 5% between 2009 and 2013."

"We see no signs that the premium sports rights value bubble is about to burst. Rights fees for live content to premium properties overall will continue to grow," said Austin Houlihan, a senior consultant in the Sports Business Group at Deloitte, to the Hollywood Reporter. "Premium live sport delivers large audiences, typically characterized by an attractive demographic profile. It drives subscriptions and generates advertising for broadcasters, particularly in an increasingly altered media landscape."

NHL is paid a pittance compared to MLB

It's probably not fair to compare hockey rights to those of the NFL, which bring in around $3 billion for the league. But is it ridiculous to think NHL rights might be worth closer to what MLB receives? According to MLB, its eight-year national media rights agreements with Fox (NASDAQ:FOX) and Time Warner's (NYSE:TWC) TBS, combined with the league's deal with Walt Disney's (NYSE:DIS) ESPN, will deliver a combined $12.4 billion -- more than a 100% increase in annual rights fees to MLB over the current arrangements.

Baseball, which, according to Nielsen averaged .69 million viewers per regular season game, a little better than hockey's .5 million, gets paid $1.3 billion more for its U.S. rights each year. Yes, the World Series averaged 14.9 million viewers, compared to the Stanley Cup Finals 5.8 million, but that hardly seems worth $1.2 billion.

With growing competition for rights, it seems the NHL is being penalized for past perception and that when it ultimately can make a new deal in the U.S. it's likely to have multiple suitors willing to pay more. Add in the improved watchability of the NHL only increasing as more people buy better TVs and hockey's surprisingly well-off fan-base and the NHL looks to be poised to continue its upward climb.

The next step for you

Want to figure out how to profit on business analysis like this? The key is to learn how to turn business insights into portfolio gold by taking your first steps as an investor. Those who wait on the sidelines are missing out on huge gains and putting their financial futures in jeopardy. In our brand-new special report, "Your Essential Guide to Start Investing Today," The Motley Fool's personal finance experts show you what you need to get started, and even give you access to some stocks to buy first. Click here to get your copy today -- it's absolutely free.

Daniel Kline has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Walt Disney. The Motley Fool owns shares of Walt Disney. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information