Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



Why NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Shares Slipped

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

While Fools should generally take the opinion of Wall Street with a grain of salt, it's not a bad idea to take a closer look at particularly stock-shaking upgrades and downgrades -- just in case their reasoning behind the call makes sense.

What: Shares of NPS Pharmaceuticals, (NASDAQ: NPSP.DL  ) slipped 1% today after Jefferies downgraded the biotechnology company from buy to hold.

So what: Along with the downgrade, analyst Eun Yang reiterated his price target of $38, representing very little upside to yesterday's close. While momentum traders might be attracted to the stock's sharp surge over the past year, Yang thinks that NPS' growth prospects, although still quite attractive, are now baked well into the valuation.

Now what: According to Jefferies, NPS' risk/reward trade-off isn't too appealing at this point. "Solid Gattex U.S. launch in 2013 and anticipation of bigger Natpara opportunity resulted in strong stock performance," noted Yang. "Now trading at ~17.2x EV/'14 revenue vs. ~16.1x for BioMarin and ~17.5x for Alexion, we view near term, potential of Gattex/Revestive and Natpara is largely priced in."

Given NPS' seemingly lofty relative and absolute valuation, it's easy to understand Jefferies' cautious stance.  

More compelling ways to grow
They said it couldn't be done. But David Gardner has proved them wrong time, and time, and time again with stock returns like 926%, 2,239%, and 4,371%. In fact, just recently one of his favorite stocks became a 100-bagger. And he's ready to do it again. You can uncover his scientific approach to crushing the market and his six carefully chosen picks for ultimate growth instantly, because he's making this premium report free for you today. Click here now for access.

Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 19, 2014, at 2:32 PM, faosto wrote:

    Seriously? You hone in on Jefferies sole downgrade to hold while failing to mention two price target upgrades with buy ratings - Needham to $46 and Wedbush to $47 - on the same day? What kind of a reporter are you, other than a short one?

    Here's a post I made on another site:

    "Jefferies, whose calls I normally respect, believes that 2014 Gattex sales and Natpara expectations are priced in already. They have a target of $38. I couldn't disagree more. My estimates for Gattex/Revestive are $160 million in 2014, $375 million in 2015, and royalties of $150 million/$200 million. Plus $5 million in 2014 for Natpara, and $150 million in 2015. That's total revenue of $315 for 2014, and $725 mill in 2015. With so much upside left after 2015, (worldwide sales for Gattex/Natpara should reach $2-3 billion), I think NPSP will be trading at least at 12X-15X revenues by YE 2015, or at $85-$107 per share. (Look at Alexion trading at 17X revenues!) Another way to look at it is that by YE 2015 NPSP should be making north of $2-$2.50 per share, and if you give that at 40-50X multiple for growth, you get to the same place. The added bonus is that the likelihood that a large player will buy out NPSP between now and YE 2015 is at least 50%, so that return of $47-$70 could happen a lot sooner. The other analysts that have the target closer to $50 are more accurate right now IMHO.

  • Report this Comment On February 20, 2014, at 10:18 PM, Corsair3117 wrote:

    Although I may quibble a bit on the generous growth multiple poster Faosto assigns NPSP, I think his estimates of individual drugs are on the money, and the absolute ignoring of the very real possibility of a buy out by a heady major player makes the Jeffries downgrade problematic at best. To ignore the upgrades offsetting it raise questions about the writer's grasp of easily attained facts and/or his strong rooting interest on the short side

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2845156, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/2/2015 3:08:17 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Brian Pacampara

I take a look at big 10% moves, as well as stock-shaking analyst calls, on a daily basis for The Fool. While I don't believe in active trading, closely monitoring Mr. Market's mood swings can help identify long-term opportunities.

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 16,236.89 178.54 1.11%
S&P 500 1,933.74 19.89 1.04%
NASD 4,700.08 63.98 1.38%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

12/31/1969 7:00 PM
NPSP.DL $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
NPS Pharmaceutical… CAPS Rating: ****