Legendary Investor Says We Should Forget the Oil Boom

Jeremy Grantham knows a thing or two about investing, and he doesn't see a future in oil.

Feb 28, 2014 at 11:00AM

Even if you don't follow the energy industry, there is a good chance you know that the United States is producing more oil than it has in a quarter century. This chart showing domestic oil production since 1920 pretty much sums it up:


Americans haven't seen this much oil coming up from our own soil since the 1990. So why does the well-respected head of an investment firm with more than $100 billion in assets think it's a waste of time? Simple: It costs too much.

Jeremy Grantham, founder and head of the global investment management firm GMO, has an excellent reputation in the investing community; his calls on the dot-com bust and the housing crisis lend themselves well to that sort of thing.

Beginning his career as an economist at Royal Dutch Shell (NYSE:RDS-A), he now exhibits some of the characteristics of an environmentalist. That said, he remains fiercely pragmatic, and his opposition to investing in oil is primarily a fiscal one. He writes in his most recent quarterly letter to investors:

Our remarkable 20% increase in output is only 2% of world production. The real oil problem is its cost -- that it costs $75 to $85 a barrel from search to delivery to find a decent amount of traditional oil when as recently as 15 years ago it cost $25.

The cost issue is what gave rise to our oil boom to begin with, as producers utilized special expensive techniques like horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing in the vast majority of wells drilled in shale plays like the Bakken and Eagle Ford. The cheap oil prices of yesteryear would never have supported the cost of those techniques.

Grantham again:


Photo credit: Joshua Doubek.

... Fracking is not cheap. The fact that increased fracking has been great for creating new jobs should give you some idea: it is both labor- and capital-intensive compared to traditional oil. Also, we drill the best sites in the best fields first, so do not expect the costs to fall per barrel (although the costs per well drilled certainly will fall with experience, the output per well will also fall).

recent article in Bloomberg points out the sheer volume of capital needed to sustain production in the Bakken oilfields of North Dakota, an area that will require 2,500 new wells drilled each year to keep oil production at current levels. It is fine for now, because capital markets are loose and the price of oil remains high, but if either of those factors changes -- markets tighten or oil prices drop -- it could have a massive impact on the U.S. oil industry.

The cost issue is already a problem for global giants like ExxonMobil (NYSE:XOM), Chevron (NYSE:CVX), and Royal Dutch Shell. These behemoths are spending more and more cash to produce less oil, as the world's so-called "easy oil" is gone, leaving the oil majors with oil is that is expensive to find and even more costly to produce.

Consider this data from The Wall Street Journal that shows the rates of capital expenditures and production over the last five years at ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell, and Chevron:

Oil Major

Capex Change

Production Change




Royal Dutch Shell






Source: The Wall Street Journal.

Despite massive inflows of capital, results have yet to pan out. Even when you take into account the fact that these massive projects can take years to come online, expensive projects started a decade ago have fallen far short of expectations.

The Kashagan field in Kazakhstan is a perfect example of that. A veritable who's who of big oil companies started exploring the region in the 1990s, and to date, the field has delivered little oil and lots of problems. You can add Shell's decade-long $5 billion fiasco in the Arctic to the list as well, as that project, still in the exploration stages, is currently on hold.

Increasingly, Grantham isn't the only one expressing concern about the future of the industry. Consider this recent note on ExxonMobil from two Oppenheimer analysts:

[ExxonMobil], like the rest of its peers, is facing an uphill battle maintaining, let alone growing, its production, as the low-hanging fruit has already been picked. Higher capital spending, rising costs, and increasing government take have squeezed earnings and reduced returns.

The analysts go on to recommend the oil giant abandon production targets and instead work to improve per-share metrics. But is it already too late for investors? As Grantham writes, "Even when considering oil, with enough progress in alternatives and in electric vehicles one begins to wonder whether this year's $650 billion spent looking for new oil will ever get a decent return." It is certainly food for thought.

One stock pick for the ages
There's a huge difference between a good stock and a stock that can make you rich. The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for 2014, and it's one of those stocks that could make you rich. You can find out which stock it is in the special free report "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2014." Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

Aimee Duffy has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Chevron. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information

Compare Brokers