Will Biofuels Be at the Core of the Next Manhattan Project?

Biofuels are a necessary component of the energy future for the United States, but major investments are needed before they can play a leading role.

Mar 6, 2014 at 9:10AM

Biofuels are big business, but investors shouldn't expect biofuels to replace petroleum-based fuels on a large scale anytime soon, despite efforts from both large corporations like ExxonMobil (NYSE:XOM) and DuPont (NYSE:DD), as well as smaller companies like KiOR (NASDAQOTH:KIORQ) and Solazyme (NASDAQ:SZYM). Top biofuel researchers and industry leaders have alluded to the need for a renewable energy initiative comparable to the Manhattan Project to properly address the nation's energy needs in the near future. Could such an initiative ever feasibly take place in the United States?

Magnitude of the effort
The Manhattan Project was a roughly five-year research and development project that resulted in the eventual production of the first atomic bombs. $2.4 billion was invested into the development effort, which equates to over $30 billion today when adjusted for inflation. To put things in perspective, ExxonMobil's 2013 shareholder distributions amounted to $25.9 billion.

While the monetary effort of the original Manhattan Project was substantive, it is vastly outweighed in significance by the national support that the project received (although the nation was ironically largely unaware of the activities at the time). This is the greatest obstacle to the implementation of a Manhattan Project for biofuels, but is likewise where such a project would produce its greatest influence. If the leaders of our country embraced the need for renewable fuels in the same fashion that the leaders in the early twentieth century embraced the need to develop weapons of mass destruction, the true monetary component would be mostly unnecessary.

What a biofuel Manhattan Project might look like
The closest that biofuels have come to their own Manhattan Project was the establishment of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) under the Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005, and the subsequent expansion of the RFS under the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007. While not a direct monetary investment by the U.S. government, both the original and the revised RFS established a foundation for reaching the goal of a widespread reduction in greenhouse gases (GHGs). The difference between the RFS and an initiative matching the scale of the Manhattan Project is the end goal: the RFS was established to create a foundation for a gradual transition from the existing fuel paradigm, while a Manhattan Project-scale biofuel effort would commit to a complete shift to a new petroleum-independent fuel paradigm.

The original Manhattan Project brought government agencies, academia, and industry together working toward a common goal. DuPont and Monsanto (NYSE:MON) contributed to the research and development efforts for the original Manhattan Project, and both could feasibly make great contributions to a similar effort devoted to biofuels. A biofuel-focused effort would require the same level of cooperation and commitment from government agencies, academia and industry as did the development of an atomic bomb. A huge investment in University research on the fundamental science, engineering and environmental impact paired with Big Oil infrastructure, massive production facilities, and support and use of government resources are just a scattering of the pieces needing compilation for the widespread development and implementation of biofuels. As is, these pieces are slowly being assembled in a mostly disjointed effort that may take decades before any monumental progress toward reducing GHG emissions is realized.

A more realistic view
If the powers that be wanted to demonstrate their commitment to American biofuels, the easiest way to show their commitment would be to build upon the already-established RFS. Unfortunately, one of the stated goals of the RFS is to reduce GHG emissions by "encouraging the development and expansion of our nation's renewable fuels sector." 'Encouraging' is not the level of emphasis needed for a revolutionary change in the way the United States views its energy and economic security. America needs more than encouragement to transition away from petroleum-based fuels. What America needs are biofuel and renewable energy initiatives that match the scale of the Manhattan Project.

America's interim solution
Biofuels will someday boom, but in the meantime it is record oil and natural gas production that is most responsible for revolutionizing the United States' energy position. Finding the right plays while historic amounts of capital expenditures are flooding the industry will pad your investment nest egg. For this reason, the Motley Fool is offering a comprehensive look at three energy companies set to soar during this transformation in the energy industry. To find out which three companies are spreading their wings, check out the special free report, "3 Stocks for the American Energy Bonanza." Don't miss out on this timely opportunity; click here to access your report -- it's absolutely free. 


Shamus Funk has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Solazyme. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information