Intel’s Best Competitive Edge Is…Infineon?

Every one of the "major" semiconductor companies vying for mobile processor dominance has something that it's really good at – it's "secret sauce." Historically, Qualcomm (NASDAQ: QCOM  ) has been known for its modem/RF prowess and Intel (NASDAQ: INTC  ) is known for being a world-class CPU designer. However, in the mobile system-on-chip world, a company needs to deliver a product that is best-in-class across the board to get noticed. Interestingly, it seems that everybody these days can design/license a competent CPU and GPU, leaving the main differentiator in smartphone processors to be the modem.

Intel is solidly No. 2 in modems today
There's no denying that Qualcomm is the top cellular modem vendor today and, as an added bonus, is also the strongest mobile SoC vendor. Across the various IPs necessary to build a SoC, Qualcomm is either No. 1 or No. 2 (depending on the benchmark and who you listen to), but it is so consistently good across the board that its SoCs are the choice for just about every "hero device" and even its mid-range and low-end solutions continue to aggressively take share against competitors.

However, a strong No. 2 is beginning to emerge in the form of Intel. Sure, MediaTek is the No. 2 vendor of mobile system-on-chip products by revenue (and Intel's share is negligible), but from the investment level Intel has been committing to this over the last several years and from the features found in Intel's recently announced XMM 7260 LTE-Advanced solution, it's clear that Intel is the only "real" competitor to Qualcomm at the high end of the modem space today. This is a long-term advantage that cannot be ignored as smartphones, at the end of the day, live and die by the quality and features of the modem.

Modems are the best way to differentiate
It seems that just about anybody can build a competent application processor – just license stock ARM Holdings CPU IP, use either ARM/Imagination Technologies graphics IP, and then build up the various IP blocks (imaging, video, camera, etc.) and – presto! – you have an applications processor. However, for this product to have value inside of the much more lucrative smartphone market (which is, again, driven by the modem), it needs to have a top-notch integrated modem (or, at the very high end of the market, a platform paired with a top-notch discrete modem).

This is where Intel and Qualcomm stand alone. While Broadcom (NASDAQ: BRCM  ) has announced that it plans to sample a category 6 LTE-Advanced modem during the middle of 2013, Intel claims that devices with its own category 6 LTE-Advanced modem will be on the shelves by Q2 2014. Qualcomm, too, has been sampling its next generation 20-nanometer MDM9x35 since the beginning of the year and plans to have availability during the second half of the year (iPhone 6, anyone?). Interestingly enough, Intel may actually beat Qualcomm to market with a category 6 LTE-Advanced modem.

Intel and Qualcomm well positioned
Nobody – not Broadcom, MediaTek, Marvell, ST-Ericsson, or NVIDIA – has modem capabilities that today match Qualcomm/Intel, which is a long-term positive for Intel once it ports its modem IP to its own manufacturing technology and integrates it into system-on-chip products. This, in this Fool's view, means that long-term Intel and Qualcomm will largely control the smartphone system-on-chip market.

This is the next big thing in tech, find out how to profit
Let's face it, every investor wants to get in on revolutionary ideas before they hit it big. Like buying PC-maker Dell in the late 1980s, before the consumer computing boom. Or purchasing stock in e-commerce pioneer Amazon.com in the late 1990s, when it was nothing more than an upstart online bookstore. The problem is, most investors don't understand the key to investing in hyper-growth markets. The real trick is to find a small-cap "pure-play" and then watch as it grows in EXPLOSIVE lockstep with its industry. Our expert team of equity analysts has identified one stock that's poised to produce rocket-ship returns with the next $14.4 TRILLION industry. Click here to get the full story in this eye-opening report.

 


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 12, 2014, at 11:47 AM, Woz2000 wrote:

    The author puts "Infineon" in the title but fails to mention it in the article.

    For those that do not know. Infineon is a German technology company that was spun off from Siemens (large German conglomerate similar to General Electric) in the late 90's. A few years ago, Intel paid Infineon over $1Billion USD for Infineon's wireless division, the division that designs and manufactures 'the modem'. Infineon used to also manufacturer DRAM, but they spun that off and named it Qimonda which went bankrupt about 2005/2006.

    Now you know!

  • Report this Comment On March 12, 2014, at 1:14 PM, drborst wrote:

    Thanks Woz.

    Also, did broadcom really say they'd sample a catagory 6 LTE modem in mid 2013? or was that a typo that should have read 2014?

    Finally, Ashraf, how about an article on how easy or hard it will be for Intel to make a modem in its own fabs. Is it really almost the same as fabing a processor?

  • Report this Comment On March 12, 2014, at 3:32 PM, TMFAeassa wrote:

    That is a typo - I meant 2014. Thanks for the catch, drborst.

  • Report this Comment On March 13, 2014, at 12:58 PM, Woz2000 wrote:

    @drborst

    I haven't really followed Intel for a couple of years now, so this info might be outdated.

    The thinking when Intel bought IFX's wireless division was to integrate the modem with their Atom processor for mobile phones. Phone manufactures want an integrated solution and this was Intel's way of gaining traction for their Atom processors for mobile applications. The biggest problem is the Atom processor is not energy efficient compared to the ARM based processors. And we all know the biggest issue with smart phones is the battery life.

    In terms of fabs, the modem is an analog device, a CPU is digital, the fab process is quite different. Intel is world class when it comes to manufacturing, so that is not a problem. The problem I think is still the power consumption of the Atom.

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2872315, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/22/2014 2:19:56 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement