Why Apple Deserves a Higher Valuation Multiple

Why Apple should trade higher than 11 times forward earnings.

Mar 11, 2014 at 3:00AM

Which would you rather own, a leading hardware tech company or a leading Internet company?

Leading hardware tech companies can be enormously profitable. They tend to grow quickly, realize economies of scale, and build world-class brands. The problem for those companies, however, is the short hardware product cycle. Most tech hardware products, no matter how good, see their markets saturated, growth slows, competitors enter at lower price points, and margins compress fairly quickly. 

Leading Internet companies do not typically have that problem. They tend to have much longer product cycles because their products have high network effects. 

Leading Internet companies, such as Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) and Google (NASDAQ:GOOGL), also do not see their margins compress due to competitors entering at lower price points. This is because Facebook and Google's products are free to users. It is the advertiser, not the user, who pays for the service, and advertisers only care about return on investment, not price. The only way for a competitor to gain market share is to offer a substantially better product. This would be very difficult because Facebook and Google could simply use their respective might to overshadow any newcomers.

In short, leading Internet companies tend to be profitable longer than leading hardware tech companies. The market recognizes this and assigns Internet companies higher valuations than hardware tech companies.  

How the market views Apple
To many market participants, Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) is just a leading tech hardware company. While Apple does have a world-class brand, economies of scale, and a talented workforce, those market participants think Apple's future margins will still follow that of a traditional hardware tech company, where margins decrease as competitors offer comparable products at lower price points.

To a certain degree, those traditionalists have been right. Apple's gross margins are down around 10% from their peak. 

But, over the past year, Apple's gross margins have held steady around 37%-38%. 


While part of the reason for the steady gross margin is Apple's world-class brand, a lot of credit also goes to the company's software. Apple software ensures that existing customers continue to buy Apple products. Customers are locked in, which gives Apple pricing power.

For example, if an Apple customer switched to Android, he would need to transfer or buy all the applications, videos, and documents that he had on his original phone or tablet. All of this takes time, money, and effort. Many people would rather just buy another iPhone or iPad and have their data automatically synced.

The bottom line
Presently, Apple trades at pure hardware tech company multiples, with a forward P/E of only 8, excluding cash. This is in stark contrast to Google's forward P/E of around 20, and Facebook's forward P/E of around 40.

Apple deserves a higher multiple because it has strong software that locks in customers. That strong lock-in increases future cash flows and ensures that Apple commands higher margins than competitors. Another reason why Apple deserves a higher valuation is its future software potential.

Facebook and Google command high valuations because of their future potential. Each company has over 1 billion users.  If they successfully launch a new software product and charge customers for it, they can realize large revenues at low cost, and their profits would go up. If they launch a hardware product, such as Google Glass, they have built-in marketing advantages thanks to those billion users. Those built-in marketing advantages increase the chance of success of new products. Depending on how the market views the software or hardware, the companies' stock price would also increase.

Like Facebook and Google, Apple also has many users. iTunes has has over 500 million customers. With its talented workforce, Apple could, one day, develop a killer software application that is just as profitable as Google's search. 

In short, the market isn't giving Apple credit for its software or its software potential. If, and when, the market does, Apple shareholders will benefit greatly. 

Get in early on Apple's latest revolutionary device
If you thought the iPod, the iPhone, and the iPad were amazing, just wait until you see this. One hundred of Apple's top engineers are busy building one in a secret lab. And an ABI Research report predicts 485 million of them could be sold over the next decade. But you can invest in it right now... for just a fraction of the price of AAPL stock. Click here to get the full story in this eye-opening new report.

Jay Yao has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Apple, Facebook, and Google. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple, Facebook, and Google. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information