The Diageo/Brown-Forman Spat: What Investors Should Know

Recent news about the labeling of "Tennessee Whiskey" is just noise as far as investors are concerned.

Mar 25, 2014 at 2:06PM

he front page of the Marketplace section of The Wall Street Journal's March 18 edition highlighted an almost comical spat between American whiskey giant Brown-Forman (NYSE:BF-A) (NYSE:BF-B) and international liquor giant Diageo (NYSE:DEO) about the use of the term "Tennessee Whiskey."

Last year, Brown-Forman successfully lobbied Tennessee lawmakers to write a law on the specifications of a product that can be labeled "Tennessee Whiskey." The law specifies that, to be labeled "Tennessee Whiskey," the product needs to be, more or less, Brown-Forman's leading brand, Jack Daniel's. Brown-Forman has quite a bit of interest in preserving the Jack Daniel's brands, as the entire family of brands accounted for 19 million of the 38 million cases of liquor the company sold in 2013.

As the Associated Press just reported today, a decision on rewriting or abolishing this law will not be voted on by Tennessee lawmakers during this session; however, they may review this issue over the summer. If and when this law is changed, will it have a significant impact on Brown-Forman? 

The law
According to the Journal, the Tennessee law states that not only does the liquor need to be made in Tennessee to carry the name, but it also has to be "made from at least 51% corn, filtered through maple charcoal and aged in new, charred oak barrels." 

Diageo and smaller-craft distilleries are claiming that the law strangles innovation, as anything labeled "Tennessee Whiskey" has to be very similar to Jack Daniel's. Brown-Forman, on the other hand, which holds an incredibly large market share of whiskey made in Tennessee, says Tennessee Whiskey is under attack.

Why wording matters
Some may say this is a silly argument, and they may be correct, as two industry giants are fighting over use of "Tennessee Whiskey," while agreeing that "whiskey from Tennessee" and other variations are perfectly acceptable. However, Tennessee Whiskey is big business for these distilleries. Just as there are specifications on what makes bourbon bourbon and what makes scotch scotch, calling a drink "Tennessee Whiskey," according to some, should reflect a certain style or quality of drink.

A look at the actual business side of things explains why this branding is important. Tennessee Whiskey is a large and fast-growing segment of the liquor market, as sales rose 6.8% last year, compared to 1.9% growth in liquor sales overall. Brown-Forman is currently in first place in the market, as the company sold 11 million cases of its Jack Daniel's Tennessee Whiskey in 2013, with Diageo in second place in the Tennessee Whiskey market with its George Dickel brand, selling an almost insignificant 130,000 cases in 2013.

If the law is overturned, how will it affect Brown-Forman?
In its 2013 Annual Report, Brown-Forman makes it obvious how big the Jack Daniel's Tennessee Whiskey brand is to its business. Along with the traditional Jack, the company also sells Gentleman Jack, Jack Daniel's Tennessee Honey, and many ready-to-serve drinks, all of which saw exceptional growth in 2013. It's estimated that Jack Daniel's holds only 7% of the world's whiskey market, and the company predicts plenty of further growth. 

"Tennessee Whiskey" is obviously important to Brown-Forman, but the outcome of this law is not. The brand loyalty and market share it has already built is most recognized by just "Jack Daniel's," rather than "Jack Daniel's Tennessee Whiskey."

As far as an investor is concerned, Brown-Forman is still an exceptional company, and the brand-name competitive advantage it has built with Jack Daniel's would be nearly insurmountable for smaller rivals wanting to label their products as Tennessee Whiskey. Brown-Forman will lose a minuscule amount of time and resources fighting this battle, but business will go on as usual one way or the other.

Brown-Forman will continue to grow its flagship Jack Daniel's brand, with no major issues about the phrasing of the name. Over the next six months to one year, we may hear more about this argument; however, investors should think of this particular issue as short-term noise that won't make a difference in the business, and nothing more.

Would you like to retire wealthy?
It's no secret that investors tend to be impatient with the market, but the best investment strategy is to buy shares in solid businesses and keep them for the long term. In the special free report, "3 Stocks That Will Help You Retire Rich," The Motley Fool shares investment ideas and strategies that could help you build wealth for years to come. Click here to grab your free copy today.

Jacob Meredith has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Diageo. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information