Marvel’s Black Widow and DC’s Wonder Woman: The Business of Girl Power

Will Black Widow and her Marvel sisters crush Wonder Woman long before she arrives in 2016?

Mar 27, 2014 at 9:33AM

Girl power is big business in movies these days. The first two films of The Hunger Games have grossed $1.56 billion, and Divergent has earned $62 million over the first few days of its release. Lions Gate Entertainment (NYSE:LGF), which distributed both films, seems to understand the magic formula of bringing popular young adult novels with strong female leads to the silver screen.

Now Disney (NYSE:DIS)/Marvel and Time Warner (NYSE:TWX)/DC are itching to replicate that success with more female characters in The Avengers: Age of Ultron and Man of Steel 2, which will finally introduce Wonder Woman.


Scarlett Johansson as Black Widow. (Source:

Scarlett Johansson, who plays Marvel's Black Widow, recently expressed strong interest in a solo film of her character. She also hinted that audiences will "see some pretty strong female characters" in the second Avengers film, which is scheduled to hit theaters in April 2015.

Johansson's statement has led to speculation that Elizabeth Olsen, who will play Scarlet Witch in the upcoming film, might not be the only female Marvel character slated to appear. Some likely candidates include Emily VanCamp (Agent 13), Cobie Smulders (Maria Hill), Lady Sif (Jaimie Alexander), and Zoe Saldana (Gamora). Could cranking up the girl power voltage steal Wonder Woman's thunder long before she arrives in DC's Man of Steel 2, which has now been postponed until 2016?


Concept art for Scarlet Witch, who will be played by Elizabeth Olsen. (Source: Marvel)

Warner Bros. has signed Gal Gadot to three films as Wonder Woman -- which are presumed to be Man of Steel 2, a solo Wonder Woman film, and Justice League. She also revealed that she will only be paid $300,000 for the first film, which pales in comparison to Scarlett Johansson's $20 million paycheck for The Avengers.

Will Gadot prove to be a better investment for DC than Johansson's Black Widow? More importantly, will they both help solo films about female comic book characters finally gain the respect that they deserve?

Why solo films for comic book heroines bombed
To understand why Black Widow and Wonder Woman represent such revolutionary turning points for comic book films, we should take a look at how terribly comic book heroines were portrayed in the past.

Perhaps it's the notion that comic book heroines should be tailored for a predominantly male audience, whereas young adult novel heroines should be refined for a female one, but films about comic book heroines have generally been horrible. Here's a history of DC and Marvel female comic characters (now split between Disney, Fox (NASDAQ:FOX), and Sony (NYSE: SNE)) who have starred in their own films:

Film (Year)


Production budget

Global box office

Rotten Tomatoes

Supergirl (1984)


$35 million

$14 million


Red Sonja (1985)


$18 million

$7 million


Catwoman (2004)

Warner Bros.

$100 million

$82 million


Elektra (2005)


$43 million

$57 million


Source: Box Office Mojo, Rotten Tomatoes, Wikipedia.

Only one film, Elektra, recovered its production costs. However, it was still a box office bomb after marketing costs were factored in. In Catwoman, the screenwriters inexplicably created a brand new version of the character named Patience Phillips in place of Selina Kyle.


Supergirl. (Source:

Should female writers write female characters?
All of these failed films were unsure about how to portray their lead characters due to the source material. Many comic book writers have a tendency to write two-dimensional female characters while the artists illustrate them in voluptuous three-dimensional detail. A vast majority of comic book writers and artists are men, as were all the writers and directors of the four aforementioned films.

By comparison, the first Hunger Games film was co-written by series author Suzanne Collins, while Divergent was co-written by Vanessa Taylor, who previously wrote episodes of Alias and Game of Thrones. Therefore, Marvel and DC should realize that female writers or directors could help films like Black Widow and Wonder Woman win over a female audience.

However, DC and Marvel have still stuck with male writers and directors to helm their blockbuster franchises. They presumably don't want to alienate their main demographic of young men in an effort to win over more female viewers. Zack Snyder, the director of 300, Watchmen, Sucker Punch, and Man of Steel, is the master of catering to that young male audience -- his female characters are simply live-action versions of their pencilled and inked counterparts.


Zack Snyder's Sucker Punch. (Source: Flickr)

By comparison, Avengers writer and director Joss Whedon is much better than Zack Snyder at winning over female audiences. His TV shows -- Buffy, Dollhouse, and Agents of SHIELD -- usually feature strong lead female characters who win over male and female viewers alike. Whereas Zack Snyder excels at slow motion and icy cool poses, Joss Whedon delivers clever, character-building dialogue intertwined with explosive popcorn action.

Therein lies the problem with DC. After watching the joyless affair that was Man of Steel, I have serious doubts that Zack Snyder can make Gadot's Wonder Woman as popular or likable as Johansson's Black Widow.

My final take
I strongly believe that female writers and directors should be given a chance to make these upcoming solo films for Black Widow and Wonder Woman. However, in the absence of that, I'd have to say that Joss Whedon and Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige have a much better chance at cashing in on the current "girl power" trend in cinema.

Although Wonder Woman is more widely recognized than Black Widow, Agent 13, Maria Hill, Lady Sif, and Gamora, Marvel has repeatedly proven that lesser-known comic book characters can still carry plenty of box office clout. Over the next two years, audiences might fall in love with Marvel's rich universe of comic book heroines, causing Zack Snyder's long-overdue portrayal of Wonder Woman to come up flat.

What do you think, fellow comic book movie fans? Is Marvel already too far ahead when it comes to portrayals of female superheroes? Let me know in the comments section below!

Time to power up your portfolio
Want to profit from the explosive growth of Marvel and DC's Cinematic Universes? The Motley Fool is offering a new special report, an essential guide to investing, which includes access to top stocks to buy now. Click here to get your free copy today.

Leo Sun owns shares of Walt Disney. The Motley Fool recommends Walt Disney. The Motley Fool owns shares of Walt Disney. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information