Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



Marvel’s Black Widow and DC’s Wonder Woman: The Business of Girl Power

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Girl power is big business in movies these days. The first two films of The Hunger Games have grossed $1.56 billion, and Divergent has earned $62 million over the first few days of its release. Lions Gate Entertainment (NYSE: LGF  ) , which distributed both films, seems to understand the magic formula of bringing popular young adult novels with strong female leads to the silver screen.

Now Disney (NYSE: DIS  ) /Marvel and Time Warner (NYSE: TWX  ) /DC are itching to replicate that success with more female characters in The Avengers: Age of Ultron and Man of Steel 2, which will finally introduce Wonder Woman.

Scarlett Johansson as Black Widow. (Source:

Scarlett Johansson, who plays Marvel's Black Widow, recently expressed strong interest in a solo film of her character. She also hinted that audiences will "see some pretty strong female characters" in the second Avengers film, which is scheduled to hit theaters in April 2015.

Johansson's statement has led to speculation that Elizabeth Olsen, who will play Scarlet Witch in the upcoming film, might not be the only female Marvel character slated to appear. Some likely candidates include Emily VanCamp (Agent 13), Cobie Smulders (Maria Hill), Lady Sif (Jaimie Alexander), and Zoe Saldana (Gamora). Could cranking up the girl power voltage steal Wonder Woman's thunder long before she arrives in DC's Man of Steel 2, which has now been postponed until 2016?

Concept art for Scarlet Witch, who will be played by Elizabeth Olsen. (Source: Marvel)

Warner Bros. has signed Gal Gadot to three films as Wonder Woman -- which are presumed to be Man of Steel 2, a solo Wonder Woman film, and Justice League. She also revealed that she will only be paid $300,000 for the first film, which pales in comparison to Scarlett Johansson's $20 million paycheck for The Avengers.

Will Gadot prove to be a better investment for DC than Johansson's Black Widow? More importantly, will they both help solo films about female comic book characters finally gain the respect that they deserve?

Why solo films for comic book heroines bombed
To understand why Black Widow and Wonder Woman represent such revolutionary turning points for comic book films, we should take a look at how terribly comic book heroines were portrayed in the past.

Perhaps it's the notion that comic book heroines should be tailored for a predominantly male audience, whereas young adult novel heroines should be refined for a female one, but films about comic book heroines have generally been horrible. Here's a history of DC and Marvel female comic characters (now split between Disney, Fox (NASDAQ: FOX  ) , and Sony (NYSE: SNE  ) ) who have starred in their own films:

Film (Year)


Production budget

Global box office

Rotten Tomatoes

Supergirl (1984)


$35 million

$14 million


Red Sonja (1985)


$18 million

$7 million


Catwoman (2004)

Warner Bros.

$100 million

$82 million


Elektra (2005)


$43 million

$57 million


Source: Box Office Mojo, Rotten Tomatoes, Wikipedia.

Only one film, Elektra, recovered its production costs. However, it was still a box office bomb after marketing costs were factored in. In Catwoman, the screenwriters inexplicably created a brand new version of the character named Patience Phillips in place of Selina Kyle.

Supergirl. (Source:

Should female writers write female characters?
All of these failed films were unsure about how to portray their lead characters due to the source material. Many comic book writers have a tendency to write two-dimensional female characters while the artists illustrate them in voluptuous three-dimensional detail. A vast majority of comic book writers and artists are men, as were all the writers and directors of the four aforementioned films.

By comparison, the first Hunger Games film was co-written by series author Suzanne Collins, while Divergent was co-written by Vanessa Taylor, who previously wrote episodes of Alias and Game of Thrones. Therefore, Marvel and DC should realize that female writers or directors could help films like Black Widow and Wonder Woman win over a female audience.

However, DC and Marvel have still stuck with male writers and directors to helm their blockbuster franchises. They presumably don't want to alienate their main demographic of young men in an effort to win over more female viewers. Zack Snyder, the director of 300, Watchmen, Sucker Punch, and Man of Steel, is the master of catering to that young male audience -- his female characters are simply live-action versions of their pencilled and inked counterparts.

Zack Snyder's Sucker Punch. (Source: Flickr)

By comparison, Avengers writer and director Joss Whedon is much better than Zack Snyder at winning over female audiences. His TV shows -- Buffy, Dollhouse, and Agents of SHIELD -- usually feature strong lead female characters who win over male and female viewers alike. Whereas Zack Snyder excels at slow motion and icy cool poses, Joss Whedon delivers clever, character-building dialogue intertwined with explosive popcorn action.

Therein lies the problem with DC. After watching the joyless affair that was Man of Steel, I have serious doubts that Zack Snyder can make Gadot's Wonder Woman as popular or likable as Johansson's Black Widow.

My final take
I strongly believe that female writers and directors should be given a chance to make these upcoming solo films for Black Widow and Wonder Woman. However, in the absence of that, I'd have to say that Joss Whedon and Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige have a much better chance at cashing in on the current "girl power" trend in cinema.

Although Wonder Woman is more widely recognized than Black Widow, Agent 13, Maria Hill, Lady Sif, and Gamora, Marvel has repeatedly proven that lesser-known comic book characters can still carry plenty of box office clout. Over the next two years, audiences might fall in love with Marvel's rich universe of comic book heroines, causing Zack Snyder's long-overdue portrayal of Wonder Woman to come up flat.

What do you think, fellow comic book movie fans? Is Marvel already too far ahead when it comes to portrayals of female superheroes? Let me know in the comments section below!

Time to power up your portfolio
Want to profit from the explosive growth of Marvel and DC's Cinematic Universes? The Motley Fool is offering a new special report, an essential guide to investing, which includes access to top stocks to buy now. Click here to get your free copy today.

Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (5)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 27, 2014, at 8:59 PM, msorrentino wrote:

    Further along than DC, however the issue with a Black Widow film would be getting the right story. What works in the comics won't necessarily translate well into movies. They would need the right writer with the right script for the right character with the right director and actor along with the right supporting cast in order to pull it off. At the moment Marvel's status on a Black Widow film fulfills two of those conditions right actor (Scarlett Johansson) and right character (Black Widow); they have their work cut out for them in order to be in a position to make a Black Widow film.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2892333, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/4/2015 6:37:02 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Leo Sun

Leo has covered the crossroads of Wall Street and Silicon Valley since 2012. Follow him on Twitter for more updates!

Today's Market

updated 9 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 16,374.76 23.38 0.14%
S&P 500 1,951.13 2.27 0.12%
NASD 4,733.50 -16.48 -0.35%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

9/3/2015 4:00 PM
DIS $101.99 Up +0.10 +0.10%
Walt Disney CAPS Rating: *****
TWX $70.70 Up +0.21 +0.30%
Time Warner CAPS Rating: ***
FOX $27.19 Up +0.02 +0.07%
Twenty-First Centu… CAPS Rating: ***
LGF $37.83 Up +0.78 +2.11%
Lions Gate Enterta… CAPS Rating: ****