The Surprising Reason Annaly Capital Management, Inc. Could Have a Good Year

After a devastating 2013, there's at least one reason to believe that the tides have turned in Annaly Capital Management's favor.

Apr 3, 2014 at 10:25AM


After one of the worst year's in recent memory for mortgage REITs, there's at least one reason to believe that 2014 will turn out to be much better for Annaly Capital Management (NYSE:NLY) and its brethren.

If you'll recall, the problem last year revolved around the Federal Reserve's decision to begin tapering its monthly purchases of mortgage-backed securities.

By decreasing demand for these instruments, the move pushed MBS prices down. Because MBS prices and yields are inversely related, the latter went up. And because MBS yields are the primary determinant of mortgage rates, these headed higher as well.

When all was said and done, here's what happened to the interest rate on conforming 30-year fixed-rate mortgages:


As you may already be aware, these trends devastated balance sheets throughout the mREIT space, as the value of investment portfolios across the industry plummeted when MBS prices dropped. Since the end of 2012, for instance, Annaly's book value per share has fallen by 23.5%, triggering a similar spiral in the price of its stock.

With this in mind, it's tempting to conclude that the Fed's recent decision to further reduce its monthly MBS purchases will only exacerbate the problem. But a deeper look at the issue suggests this may turn out to be wrong.

According to Annaly's head of agency trading, David Finkelstein, the dynamics of the MBS marketplace have evolved over the past year. While a lot of attention has been paid to the demand side of the equation, thanks largely to the central bank, there's been an equally robust impact on supply.


As mortgage rates soared, the desire and ability to buy a house or refinance a mortgage dove precipitously. And because fewer mortgages mean fewer MBS, it follows that the MBS supply has contracted -- or, at the very least, that any additional supply to hit the market will be more than offset by the Fed's diminished purchasing program. As Finkelstein explained on Annaly's most recent earnings call:

I think when we look at what actual net supply or growth of the agency MBS market will be this year, most estimates have it ranging from about $100 billion to $150 billion in net supply. The Fed, even with the taper, will absorb that much supply in the first four to five months of this year. So the technicals for the year are certainly on the positive side.

The net result of this is twofold. In the first case, if true, it will staunch the decline in book values throughout the industry. This alone would be a welcome surprise to many investors in the space.

Beyond this, it might give a company like Annaly a chance to opportunistically releverage its balance sheet. At the end of last year, Annaly was levered only five to one, its lowest level in years. This leaves the company with "tremendous buying power to augment forward earnings," says CEO Wellington Denahan-Norris.

Does this mean that an end to the mREIT industry's agony is in sight? While the answer will only be obvious in hindsight, it's getting safer to assume that companies like Annaly may soon be headed in the right direction again if they haven't already set off on that journey.

Is this a better dividend option than mREITs?
Recent tax increases have affected nearly every American taxpayer. But with the right planning, you can take steps to take control of your taxes and collect big income like clockwork. In our brand-new special report "The IRS Is Daring You to Make This Investment Now!," you'll learn about the simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule. Don't miss out on advice that could help you boost your income for decades to come. Click here to learn more.

John Maxfield has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

A Financial Plan on an Index Card

Keeping it simple.

Aug 7, 2015 at 11:26AM

Two years ago, University of Chicago professor Harold Pollack wrote his entire financial plan on an index card.

It blew up. People loved the idea. Financial advice is often intentionally complicated. Obscurity lets advisors charge higher fees. But the most important parts are painfully simple. Here's how Pollack put it:

The card came out of chat I had regarding what I view as the financial industry's basic dilemma: The best investment advice fits on an index card. A commenter asked for the actual index card. Although I was originally speaking in metaphor, I grabbed a pen and one of my daughter's note cards, scribbled this out in maybe three minutes, snapped a picture with my iPhone, and the rest was history.

More advisors and investors caught onto the idea and started writing their own financial plans on a single index card.

I love the exercise, because it makes you think about what's important and forces you to be succinct.

So, here's my index-card financial plan:


Everything else is details. 

Something big just happened

I don't know about you, but I always pay attention when one of the best growth investors in the world gives me a stock tip. Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner (whose growth-stock newsletter was rated #1 in the world by The Wall Street Journal)* and his brother, Motley Fool CEO Tom Gardner, just revealed two brand new stock recommendations moments ago. Together, they've tripled the stock market's return over 12+ years. And while timing isn't everything, the history of Tom and David's stock picks shows that it pays to get in early on their ideas.

Click here to be among the first people to hear about David and Tom's newest stock recommendations.

*"Look Who's on Top Now" appeared in The Wall Street Journal which references Hulbert's rankings of the best performing stock picking newsletters over a 5-year period from 2008-2013.

Compare Brokers