New Report From UN Panel Shows Who's Responsible for CO2 Emissions

In this April 3, 2014, file photo giant machines dig for brown coal at the open-cast mining Garzweiler in front of a smoking power plant near the city of Grevenbroich in western Germany. (AP Photo/Martin Meissner)

BERLIN (AP) -- The U.N.'s expert panel on climate change is preparing a new report this weekend outlining the cuts in greenhouse gases, mainly CO2 from the burning of fossil fuels, required in coming decades to keep global warming in check.

Since it's a scientific body, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change won't tell governments how to divide those emissions cuts -- a crunch issue in negotiations on a new climate pact that's supposed to be adopted next year.

However, in a leaked draft of the report obtained by The Associated Press, the IPCC shows with graphs and tables which countries are responsible for the greatest share of emissions, using a range of different accounting methods. These are some of the key facts on emissions:

CURRENT TOTAL EMISSIONS
At the time of the IPCC's previous climate assessment, in 2007, the U.S. was the world's top carbon polluter. It has since been overtaken by China, which now accounts for one-quarter of global emissions because of its rapidly expanding economy. The U.S. is No. 2 with 17%, followed by India (6.6%), Russia (5.1%) and Japan (3.7%).

HISTORICAL EMISSIONS
If you count back to when the Industrial Revolution started in the 18th century, the U.S. is the undisputed No. 1, accounting for nearly 28% of the world's cumulative emissions from energy and industry. China's share is 9.9%, Russia's 6.9%, Britain's 5.9% and Germany's 5.6%. Western countries rank high because they have been burning coal and oil for much longer than the rest of the world.

EMISSIONS PER CAPITA
Putting emissions in proportion to population size also puts Western countries -- and oil and gas-rich Gulf states -- at the top of the table. In per-capita emissions, Australians, Canadians and Americans exceed 20 tons of carbon per year -- more than twice as much as the Chinese. "Overall, per-capita emissions in the highly industrialized countries ... remain, on average, about five times higher than those of the lowest income countries," the draft report says.

CONSUMPTION EMISSIONS
The main way of counting emissions is by looking at where they are released. But some say you get a better picture of what's driving emissions by looking at consumption patterns. As the IPCC puts it: "A ton of steel produced in China but exported to the United States results in emissions in China when the fundamental demand for the steel originated in the U.S." Accounting for emissions based on where a product is consumed rather than where it's manufactured still puts China at the top, but with a narrower gap to the U.S. China accounts for 21.9% of global consumption emissions, while the U.S. accounts for 18.1%.

EMISSIONS BY SECTOR
Energy production is the biggest source of emissions, representing about one-third of the world total. Of the fossil fuels, coal generates the highest emissions, followed by oil and then natural gas. Agriculture, forestry and other land use accounts for 24% of total emissions. Other big sectors include transport (13%) and buildings (7%).

FUTURE EMISSIONS
The IPPC gives a range of trajectories for global emissions, but doesn't break them down by country. However, it notes that nearly all growth in emissions is expected to occur in developing countries, as their populations grow and they try to catch up economically with the industrialized world. Developing countries say that's why they shouldn't have to face as strict emissions targets in a new treaty as industrialized nations. The latter say at least the biggest developing nations, including China, India and Brazil, must also make significant cuts. Both sides will likely point to selected statistics and projections in the IPCC report.

link


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 12, 2014, at 1:37 PM, ibuildthings wrote:

    When their proposed solutions are something more than schemes to soak the west, I will be more interested. The Kyoto treaty was a recipe for wealth transfer, not a recipe for emissions reduction. That's why every Senator, regardless of party, voted against ratification of that treaty.

  • Report this Comment On April 14, 2014, at 9:43 AM, damilkman wrote:

    The greenies have no chance because in order to enact most of America would have to take a major hit. Unlike health care it would not be so easy to lie about it. Until alternative energy is truly viable, no one is going to use it.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2912567, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/20/2014 2:08:23 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement