ConocoPhillips vs. Occidental Petroleum: Why Oxy Could Be the Better Play

The choice between ConocoPhillips and Occidental Petroleum is a tough one. In an article published a few days ago, an article gave the edge to ConocoPhillips. In this article, I will take the other side of the coin and explain the case for Occidental Petroleum.

May 2, 2014 at 10:08AM

A couple days ago, fellow Fool Rupert Hargreaves wrote a thought-provoking article comparing ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) to Occidental Petroleum (NYSE:OXY) in terms of both income and growth. He concluded that Occidental Petroleum was roughly equal to ConocoPhillips in terms of growth. However, when looking at income potential, Hargreaves cited Conoco's higher dividend yield and slightly lower price-to-earnings valuation, and concluded that Conoco was the all around better choice. 

The choice between ConocoPhillips and Occidental is indeed a tough one. In fact, I really like both, but at this time, I actually think that Occidental is the better choice, and in this article I will explain why. For the sake of consistency, I will use Rupert's criteria of income and growth to compare the two.

Plans for growth
In his article, Rupert explained ConocoPhillips' production growth prospects quite well: 3% to 5% compound annual production growth until 2017, driven by higher-margin production, with the 'key' to Conoco's growth coming from the Eagle Ford shale. In addition, Conoco has some other high-margin growth projects under way in the oil sands, Malaysia, Australia, the UK, and the Norwegian North Sea. 

But what about Occidental? The article was correct in that the spinoff should unlock some interesting growth potential, but I don't believe that his article fully appreciated Occidental's post-split growth opportunities. 

After Occidental spins off its California and Bakken assets and sells much of its Middle East and North African assets, what we will have left will be a Texas-centered business. Yes, Occidental had trouble shale drilling in California, but the post-spin Occidental will finally be able to concentrate on the Permian Basin, where the company has a massive 2 million acre position, much of it over the completely undeveloped Wolfcamp Shale play. For the leaner company that Occidental will be, development of horizontal drilling in the Wolfcamp shale could later lead to eye-opening production growth. 

Dividends are important these days, and it's always good to look at the dividends of comparable companies before making an investment decision. Yes, ConocoPhillips has a yield of over 4% while Occidental yields only 3%. Yes, I do think Conoco is an excellent dividend play with great underlying, cash-positive assets in Alaska and Bayu Undan. 

But let's take a closer look at what a post-split Occidental might have in store. Occidental holds perhaps the most profitable oil position in North America: 2 million acres of CO2 injection oilfields in the Permian Basin. Right now, the immense profitability of this acreage is masked by Occidental's other acreage around the world. But not so with post-split Occidental, where Permian CO2 operations will be the company's flagship business unit. When all other assets are shed, and all the share buybacks completed, Occidental's West Texas CO2 oil may give us a very juicy dividend yield. 

Unlocking value
The most important reason that I would pick Occidental over ConocoPhillips right now is that Occidental is unlocking value through a breakup. Breakups work -- just ask ConocoPhillips, which went from about $50 to nearly $75 since its breakup from Phillips 66 in 2012. Immediately after the breakup, Conoco yielded 5%. I believe we might get a similar yield out of Occidental after its breakup. 

Even more important than the dividend is just how much Occidental's assets would be worth piecemeal. Bank of America analyst Doug Leggate thinks the company could be worth $150 per share in a split, provided that the split also separate Occidental's Middle East and North Africa assets from its Americas assets. Currently, shares of Occidental sit at about $95. This gives us over 50% upside potential. 

Bottom line
A choice between ConocoPhillips and Occidental is a tough one. Personally, I like both, and I have been long Conoco since before the split, but if I had to buy one today, it would be Occidental. The tremendous potential for horizontal drilling development and the high-margin profitability of Permian CO2-injection oil operations could soon give Occidental an industry-leading dividend and some solid growth above what ConocoPhillips can offer. 

The best ways to play America's energy boom
Record oil and natural gas production is revolutionizing the United States' energy position. Finding the right plays while historic amounts of capital expenditures are flooding the industry will pad your investment nest egg. For this reason, the Motley Fool is offering a look at three energy companies using a small IRS "loophole" to help line investor pockets. Learn this strategy, and the energy companies taking advantage, in our special report "The IRS Is Daring You To Make This Energy Investment." Don't miss out on this timely opportunity; click here to access your report -- it's absolutely free. 


Casey Hoerth owns shares of ConocoPhillips. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information