The Fannie and Freddie Experiment Was a "Total Failure"

Despite recent reports suggesting Warren Buffett was open to filling a potential void in the housing finance market if Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were wound down, Buffett and Charlie Munger all but squashed that notion during the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting on Saturday.

During the famous day-long Q&A session with Berkshire shareholders, a questioner asked if Buffett thought Berkshire could play a large role in a more privatized housing finance market because of Berkshire's underwriting expertise and experience in the housing market. 

Buffett said it was very unlikely that Berkshire would become a big player in that market.

So what does Buffett think should happen to the market?

Buffett highlighted the U.S. housing market's enormous size ($11 trillion) as a massive challenge to privatizing the market simply because there isn't enough capacity in the private insurance market.

He seemed to believe a system similar to the plan proposed by Sens. Johnson and Crapo, as well as Sens. Corker and Warner, could potentially work. Noting that the 30-year fixed rate mortgage is a great thing for the average American, Buffett said the government ultimately needs to be the insurance entity to keep rates low. 

His partner, Charlie Munger, took a more blunt stance.

Munger believes the current system is best option: Continue to conservatively run Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and do not return the entities to the hands of private shareholders. Despite addressing the common concerns with the current model, Munger expressed even more doubt that private mortgage finance players would operate a better system. 

One of the largest drivers of the collapse of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was the pressure to deliver continued earning-per-share growth for the private shareholders. Both companies aimed to achieve this growth by taking out cheap debt and building massive securities portfolios.

These legacy portfolios are currently being wound down -- a move Buffett and Munger agreed was the right one. They said the two GSEs were essentially operating as the country's largest hedge funds before the housing crisis.

As current common and preferred shareholders continue to hang in a state of financial-limbo, the path to significant profits (outside of potential legal settlements) continues to look like one littered with road-blocks. Any passable law making its way around Congress ignores these shareholders and now two of the best business minds in the world in Buffett and Munger agree that returning these entities to private hands would be a mistake.

Munger wrapped up the discussion by saying that the old Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac "experiment was a total failure."

Warren Buffett just bought nearly 9 million shares of this company
Imagine a company that rents a very specific and valuable piece of machinery for $41,000... per hour (that's almost as much as the average American makes in a year!). And Warren Buffett is so confident in this company's can't-live-without-it business model, he just loaded up on 8.8 million shares. An exclusive, brand-new Motley Fool report details this company that already has over 50% market share. Just click HERE to discover more about this industry-leading stock... and join Buffett in his quest for a veritable landslide of profits!

Read about the entire Berkshire Hathaway Q&A session here!


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 05, 2014, at 8:11 PM, maestrolindo wrote:

    I agree. Keeping Fannie and Freddie in conservatorship for six years without the ability to recapitalize has been a total failure

  • Report this Comment On May 07, 2014, at 9:40 AM, casahanson8 wrote:

    David, your article is either full of contradictions or your command of the language is deficient enough to confuse the average reader. Headline vs schizophrenic content and lack of summation...wt*?

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2942398, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/28/2014 6:02:57 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement