Warren Buffett's Brilliant Plan to Make His Investors Richer

I have a hunch: Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-A  ) (NYSE: BRK-B  ) shareholders are some of the smartest investors out there.

Last weekend, Berkshire shareholders shot down a proposal to pay a dividend by a 30-to-1 margin. Shareholders are clearly content with business as usual. A dividend from Berkshire looks as probable as a human colony on Mars by 2015.

Shocked? Some are. Berkshire's own shareholders shouldn't be. There is absolutely no reason for Berkshire Hathaway to pay a dividend.

Why a dividend would be a mistake
Let's avoid the obvious: Buffett is one of the best capital allocators on the planet. Taking money out of his hands is like taking a bat from Babe Ruth. You just don't do it.

But the reason for keeping cash at Berkshire goes beyond Buffett. It comes down to compounding.

I went back to Berkshire's portfolio and looked through the financials of just some of Berkshire's holdings. As I went through, I found a very unsurprising, very "Buffett," commonality.

Take a look at this chart of diluted shares outstanding for five of Berkshire's stock holdings:

Notice something? All lines go down. In most cases, the plotted points move lower and lower in every single year. In every case, the diluted share count as of the end of 2013 is lower than in 2004.

These five companies are what Charlie Munger would call cannibals -- companies that slowly "eat" themselves by buying back stock.

The future for Berkshire
Berkshire Hathaway shareholders understand the company's future looks a lot like the above chart. As Berkshire Hathaway grows larger, spits off more cash, and has fewer reinvestment opportunities, it has one big opportunity ahead of itself: Growing by getting smaller.

You see, dividends are great. Everyone loves a little cash incentive to continue holding a stock. But for the long-term investor, buybacks can be a much, much better use of cash. Some of the best-performing stocks in history -- from Teledyne to Wal-Mart -- have been routine and frequent financial alchemists. They've created tremendous value by shrinking their shareholder base.

Buffett and Munger have long understood that buybacks can create value for investors. You see this in Berkshire's own stock portfolio.

And although buybacks have a bad reputation for being poorly timed, or worse, hiding excessive compensation, the companies that do it right deliver outsized returns to investors.

Dividends, and their resulting taxes, are the price you pay for management you do not trust with a company's cash. Berkshire's record is remarkable. Its buyback policy is undoubtedly one of the most transparent in corporate history. To deny it a future of cannibalism would be to deny it a massive opportunity to grow shareholder wealth in the most tax-efficient way possible -- financial sacrilege.

Warren Buffett just bought nearly 9 million shares of this company
Imagine a company that rents a very specific and valuable piece of machinery for $41,000... per hour (that's almost as much as the average American makes in a year!). And Warren Buffett is so confident in this company's can't-live-without-it business model, he just loaded up on 8.8 million shares. An exclusive, brand-new Motley Fool report details this company that already has over 50% market share. Just click HERE to discover more about this industry-leading stock... and join Buffett in his quest for a veritable landslide of profits!


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 12, 2014, at 8:59 AM, pondee619 wrote:

    Then isn't the only way to enjoy the fruits of Berkshires labors is to sell it and no longer have it.

    The old saying of eating your cake and having it too seems to apply to Berkshire. I can have my cake only if I don't eat it. but then what good is having the cake. If I eat the cake, the only reason for having cake, then I no longer have it to enjoy.

    If I own Berkshire it remains a pretty asset on my balance sheet, but it does nothing effecting what I can spend. The only way to employ Berkshire is to sell it, and then I'm out.

    If your only asset was Berkshire stock you would starve while holding and getting rich.

    " But for the long-term investor..." there comes a time in our our finite lives when stock ownership must pay the bills. The only way the Berkshire owner pays his/her bills is to sell and get out. The ultimate goal in owning Berkshire is getting out.

  • Report this Comment On May 12, 2014, at 4:03 PM, Chuck3296 wrote:

    True. But you don't have to sell all your cake or eat it all at once either. You can eat 5% and keep 95%. And if the cake grows at an annual rate of, say 10% and you only sell/eat 5% per year - you can eat a lot of cake for a long time. . . (apologies to Marie Antoinette.)

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2945721, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/21/2014 8:32:22 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement