Intel's Silvermont and ARM's Cortex A15 Face Off

Thanks to Linux-focused site Phoronix, we now have a more accurate comparison of Intel's and ARM's finest mobile CPU cores.

May 13, 2014 at 10:30AM

For the longest time, it has been difficult to get a true apples-to-apples comparison of the latest-and-greatest ARM (NASDAQ:ARMH) processor cores against Intel's (NASDAQ:INTC) low-power processors. While the world has had to endure legions of poorly-written mobile benchmarks, the release NVIDIA's (NASDAQ:NVDA) Jetson TK1 development board on Linux has allowed Linux site Phoronix to do some benchmarking with meatier general-purpose CPU tests. ARM's Cortex A15 and Intel's Silvermont finally face off!

The results are pretty interesting
The Phoronix Test Suite includes a variety of workloads from ray tracing to code compilation. With that in mind, let's take a look at the results (bolded implies the superior score and some tests are in milliseconds so lower is better):



Intel Celeron J1900 (4 Cores @ 2GHz)

SciMark (Composite)



SciMark (Monte Carlo)



SciMark (Fast Fourier Transform)



SciMark (Sparse Matrix Multiply)



SciMark (Dense LU Matrix Factorization)



Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation



VP8 libvpx Encoding



X264 Encoding



Timed Apache Compilation



Timed ImageMagick Compilation






OpenSSL RSA 4096-bit Performance



NGINX Benchmark



Source: Phoronix.

Interestingly enough, the quad 2GHz Silvermont tends to beat the quad ARM Cortex A15r3 (albeit at an unknown clock speed, although 2.3GHz would be a reasonable assumption given NVIDIA's earlier announcements on Tegra K1). While the VP8 libvpx results look like an outlier (perhaps this was hardware accelerated on the Intel but not the Tegra), the overall picture here is that in computational workloads, the ARM and the Intel trade off depending on the workload.

For the compilation and encryption workloads, the Intel seems to have a distinct advantage likely due to superior cache/memory performance (which is what such workloads stress) while the ARM seems to like floating-point intensive applications, as seen in the ray-tracing test. This makes sense given that the Silvermont floating point subsystem isn't particularly aggressive while the ARM designs tends to be more aggressive there.

Worlds collide
The unfortunate part of this testing is that we didn't get any power consumption numbers as this is a key metric in determining whether a mobile-oriented CPU core is successful or not. The rated "TDP" of the Celeron J1900 is 10W and from NVIDIA's recent statements, the K1 is also roughly a 10W part at full load. Of course, these numbers include the graphics processor, so in pure CPU workloads, the maximum power draw should be considerably less.

At any rate, the more interesting observation here is that ARM is scaling up and providing levels of performance roughly comparable to a low-end PC and Intel is pushing down into the mobile realm. In terms of CPUs, the next big face-off will be among the following in 2015:

  • NVIDIA's Project Denver
  • ARM's Cortex A57 (successor to A15)
  • Intel's Airmont and Goldmont
  • AMD's Puma+

The worlds of mobile devices and PCs have already begun to merge and the distinction will become even less clear as the next several years progress. The question from an investment perspective is whether the ARM camp will be more successful in moving up the value chain into PCs and servers or whether Intel will be more successful in pushing down into smartphones and tablets.

The biggest thing to come out of Silicon Valley in years
If you thought the iPod, the iPhone, and the iPad were amazing, just wait until you see this. One hundred of Apple's top engineers are busy building one in a secret lab. And an ABI Research report predicts 485 million of them could be sold over the next decade. But you can invest in it right now... for just a fraction of the price of AAPL stock. Click here to get the full story in this eye-opening new report.

Ashraf Eassa owns shares of ARM Holdings and Intel. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Intel. It recommends NVIDIA. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information