Will Politicians Crush Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?

This article is part of a series of articles that looks at Fannie Mae  (NASDAQOTCBB: FNMA  )  and Freddie Mac  (NASDAQOTCBB: FMCC  )  from an investment perspective. To read the full analysis, click here.

It's not often that both sides of Congress agree on something, but in this case, there is a general consensus agreement to wind down Fannie and Freddie.

But we're approaching six years since the bailout and this has not happened because, while democrats and republicans can agree on a desire to wind down Fannie and Freddie, they can't agree on what to replace them with.

As of now, it looks difficult for a housing reform bill to pass based on the layout of each house. Although the Senate has a reasonable chance that with enough negotiating, it could pass a bipartisan bill, such legislation would likely be dead on arrival in the House which is controlled by the republicans taking a firm stance against government involvement in the housing market.

Presidential opinion
Since it would be difficult to pass housing reform legislation in the first place, let alone override a presidential veto, housing reform legislation will need the support of the President to become law. In his last State of the Union address, President Obama mentioned housing reform among the things he would like to see accomplished and previous comments indicate he is favorable to something resembling the Corker-Warner bill.

From Corker-Warner to Johnson-Crapo
Last year, Congress attempted to make its first major attempt at housing reform legislation with the Corker-Warner bill. Under the bill's guidelines, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would be wound down and replaced by a Federal Mortgage Insurance Corporation (FMIC) operating on a similar model to the FDIC that protects deposits of up to $250,000 in bank accounts.

Fannie and Freddie's private investors would likely see little if any of the proceeds from the wind-down as the government's $189 billion senior preferred stock stake is ahead of them in line. Fortunately for Fannie and Freddie investors, the Corker-Warner bill never became law.

However, the next housing reform bill is the Johnson-Crapo bill which looks almost exactly like the Corker-Warner bill. Like Corker-Warner, Johnson-Crapo would wind down Fannie and Freddie and distribute proceeds to the government first before giving any leftovers to private investors.

Countdown to elections
After the Senate panel vote was delayed in late April, passage of Johnson-Crapo became even more difficult as Congress in now in a race against the clock. Now, with the vote delayed and six key democrats opposed to the bill's passage is becoming even more difficult.

In just a few months, members of Congress will be leaving to campaign for the 2014 midterms so the bill would need the ultimate financial fast-tracking to move through Congress this year. And with legislation as large and controversial as Johnson-Crapo, the bill is highly unlikely to receive fast-track treatment.

The bottom line
With the exception of some sort of miraculous bipartisan agreement, Johnson-Crapo is highly unlikely to be passed before Congress begins leaving for 2014 campaigning.

Most likely another Congress will take up the issue again but that will again take more time and we may ultimately be left with the same disagreement we have now.

But what's the endgame for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac investors? If the only thing Congress can agree on is winding down Fannie and Freddie, how can private investors hope to see value in their investments?

The answer may lie in the courts.

Take advantage of this little-known tax "loophole"
Recent tax increases have affected nearly every American taxpayer. But with the right planning, you can take steps to take control of your taxes and potentially even lower your tax bill. In our brand-new special report "The IRS Is Daring You to Make This Investment Now!," you'll learn about the simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule. Don't miss out on advice that could help you cut taxes for decades to come. Click here to learn more.

This article is part of a series of articles that looks at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from an investment perspective. To read the full analysis, click here.


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 17, 2014, at 8:24 AM, bigjohn327 wrote:

    with key democrats and some republicans against the bill and it barely squeeking out of committee harry reid will not bring it for a vote,,,,,,so it will not make it to the house,,,,mark it DOA

  • Report this Comment On May 17, 2014, at 12:31 PM, maestrolindo wrote:

    First of all, its up to the courts. The government is refusing to comply with discovery and could be found in contempt from what I have seen thus far. A cease and desist order of the sweep could end this nonsense abruptly.

    Secondly, this is a non issue until December. The Senate Banking Committee's decision was all rhetoric and politics. Do not expect a peep from Congress until the elections are over.

    Think about it. Is Mark Warner going to be re-elected campaigning to eliminate 7,000 Freddie Mac jobs in Virgina?

  • Report this Comment On May 17, 2014, at 12:36 PM, maestrolindo wrote:

    Sorry I missed the last line of your article. Very astute

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2957982, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/26/2014 12:10:59 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement