When it Comes to Dividends, is it Really About How Big You Are?

Industry insiders are saying that small REITs can't compete, but what about landlords where that's an advantage?

May 20, 2014 at 6:00AM

Being a big company has its benefits, but there's also negatives. So while legendary real estate investor Sam Zell highlights the need for scale in the real estate investment trust (REIT) world, it doesn't mean that every REIT should strive to be a giant.

The case that proves the Zell
When it comes to REITs, the business model is pretty simple. Buy property, rent it out, pay 90% of earnings to shareholders. But, that last one means that REITs have to constantly come to the public markets for new equity and debt capital if they want to grow. It's much easier for large companies to get attention on Wall Street, which is why Zell expects small players to get gobbled up by bigger ones in the future. The small fry, he suggests, won't be able to compete effectively for growth capital.

American Realty Capital Properties (NYSE:VER) is probably the poster child for this idea. The triple net lease landlord came public in 2011 with a portfolio of around 60 properties. It wasn't even a small fry compared the industry's largest player, which, at the time, owned over 2,500 properties. American Realty Capital raised around $100 million in its IPO.

Today, American Realty owns over 3,700 properties. It's market cap is $2.6 billion and it's swimming with bigger fish now -- what a change a few years makes. However, the swift ascent seems to have the market concerned. After peaking at over $17 a share, the stock now trades at around $13.

ARCP Chart

Too big, too fast
The reason is potential indigestion. American Realty Capital Properties got so big by gobbling up other triple net lease players. If American Realty can pull off the get big quick approach, the recent yield of around 7.5% is a great buying opportunity (the other big players yield around 5%). If not, a dividend cut isn't out of the question.

And, sometimes, being small is actually a good thing. Take, for example, Whitestone REIT (NYSE:WSR). This company operates a portfolio of roughly 60 properties in Texas, Arizona, and Illinois. That said, it only has one property in Illinois, so it's really focused around just two markets.

Whitestone's specialty is buying local strip malls that are in disrepair or that have fallen out of favor. It fixes them up and turns them into what management calls "Community Centered Properties," a term Whitestone has trademarked.

Essentially, Whitestone takes jalopies and turns them into race cars... well, maybe station wagons is more to the point. That's because these strip malls house things like grocery stores, hair salons, and dry cleaners. The types of businesses you visit regularly. Strip malls are, actually, a great asset class if you like boring and reliable.

Although Whitestone remains a tiny player with an around $300 million market cap, revenues have gone up in each of the past three years. The rent roll has increased from about about $35 million in 2011 to over $60 million last year. And being small is a big benefit, because turning a single property around can still lead to material improvement on the top and bottom lines.


(Source: Ecksemmess, via Wikimedia Commons)

On an operational front, it would it be hard for Whitestone to call itself "Community Centered" if it owned thousands of properties spread across 50 states. But it would be even harder to keep growing using the same fixer-upper model. In this case, small and nimble Whitestone is benefiting from fishing in ponds that are too small for the big players.

Opportunity, but don't be blinded
Sam Zell is correct that big REITs have better access to capital. He's also correct that consolidation is likely in the REIT world, American Realty Capital proves that point. However, that doesn't mean that being big is the only way to make money. Whitestone REIT is a good example of small being beautiful.

Top dividend stocks for the next decade
The smartest investors know that dividend stocks simply crush their non-dividend paying counterparts over the long term. That's beyond dispute. They also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily, while still allowing you to sleep like a baby. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor's portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.

Reuben Brewer has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information