Could Apple Get Broadcom's Cellular Business on the Cheap?

A little while ago, I penned a piece claiming that it would probably not make sense from a cost-savings and risk-management perspective for Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) to move cellular baseband in-house. However, there is a strong likelihood that if Apple were to build a viable baseband and integrate it onto the same piece of silicon as its applications processor, it could realize a cost, performance, and power advantage over a discrete solution. With Broadcom's (NASDAQ: BRCM  ) cellular business on the proverbial chopping block, is Apple likely to be a contender to buy this business?

Sounds better than Beats
Apple certainly has a lot of cash in its coffers and has been using quite a bit of it to buy back its own stock. In addition, it's been rumored that Apple is interested in buying headphone maker Beats Electronics for $3.2 billion. While some believe that this is a good strategic move, others -- including yours truly -- think it would be puzzling at best. Apple is better off bolstering its technological capabilities and bringing more silicon capability in-house, and picking up Broadcom's cellular business would be an interesting way to do that.

That said, if Apple wanted baseband, why didn't it buy Renesas Mobile?
Most of Broadcom's mobile roadmap and product pipeline today seems to be built upon a merger of its own internal efforts and the assets acquired from Renesas Mobile in late 2013. In particular, Broadcom probably scrapped its own internal modem efforts and used the Renesas modem roadmap as the heart of the current efforts. As far as the rest of the IP blocks go, Broadcom is licensing ARM Holdings (NASDAQ: ARMH  ) CPU cores and probably Imagination Technologies (LSE: IMG  ) GPUs, and then the rest of the SoC is either of Renesas Mobile or Broadcom heritage.

It seems likely, then, that if Apple wanted to do its own modem, it could have picked up Renesas Mobile for itself. Remember that Broadcom paid a mere $164 million for the Renesas Mobile assets, and Broadcom's CEO noted shortly after the acquisition was announced that Renesas had a very difficult time shopping around that business. Apple could have easily afforded to pick these assets up (along with anything else that it needs), yet it didn't bother to pick it up.

Could it simply be that Apple isn't interested in building its own cellular platform?

Renesas Mobile went for $164 million
At this point, it's interesting to think about how much Broadcom could get from selling the assets related to its cellular efforts. Surely over the past several years this has been a money sink, with the losses likely in the hundreds of millions or even the low billions at this point. However, while it would be nice for Broadcom to be able to recoup its development efforts here, it probably won't in full.

Further, the big problem with trying to sell such an asset is that the "expense" isn't really going to be in the upfront cost of the business and assets, but in how much it will cost to actually maintain those R&D efforts. A company like Apple already has a world-class SoC team, so it would really only be interested in the modem IP. While Broadcom could sell to Apple the modem team or teams, the rest of its cellular and SoC business would probably be of minimal value to Apple at this point.

It's tough to imagine that Apple would need to pay an obscene multiple of the $164 million that Broadcom paid for Renesas Mobile. 

Foolish bottom line
It's interesting that Apple still hasn't made too much of a public fuss about building its own modems. While the financial benefit from building its own discrete modem is unlikely to be worthwhile, there would probably be performance and power benefits (as well as potentially cost benefits) in moving that IP onto the same piece of silicon as the apps processor. Time will tell what becomes of Broadcom's cellular efforts as well as what Apple ultimately does vis-a-vis modem technology, but it's clear that this space is never boring.

Leaked: Apple's next smart device (warning -- it may shock you)
Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee that its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out, and some early viewers are even claiming that its everyday impact could trump the iPod, iPhone, and the iPad. In fact, ABI Research predicts that 485 million of these devices will be sold per year. But one small company makes this gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and to see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!

Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (5)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 23, 2014, at 3:56 PM, johnestromjr wrote:

    Ashraf, Apple NEEDS streaming. That and the two innovators that would, hopefully, be a part of a Beats deal. They have a very good business in iTunes selling music by the song but the future IS streaming and they're not in the game. As both Apple and Beats are domiciled in Ireland [Northern Ireland?] they can use overseas assets for the acquisition saving over $1 Billion.

    Apple does NOT need to own baseband. It would be nice if they could ultimately provide everything "in house" but there is no urgency unless the urgency is by Broadcom. The important part - Apple wants to build an end-to-end information / entertainment system providing the devices, the software and the content and delivering it to their customers. Streaming would be high on that "need" list and baseband would not. Not that it wouldn't be a good but but Apple has too many irons in the fire now to worry about acquiring Broadcom for baseband. I respectfully disagree with you.

  • Report this Comment On May 23, 2014, at 10:37 PM, TMFAeassa wrote:

    Hi John --

    Thank you for your comments/perspective. While I'm not as sold on the Beats acquisition, you do make an interesting case that's worth digging further into.

    Thanks for reading, and Fool On!


Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2969301, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/29/2015 10:51:30 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Ashraf Eassa

Ashraf Eassa is a technology specialist with The Motley Fool. He writes mostly about technology stocks, but is especially interested in anything related to chips -- the semiconductor kind, that is. Follow him on Twitter:

Today's Market

updated 13 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 16,643.01 -11.76 -0.07%
S&P 500 1,988.87 1.21 0.06%
NASD 4,828.33 15.62 0.32%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

8/28/2015 4:00 PM
AAPL $113.29 Up +0.37 +0.33%
Apple CAPS Rating: ****
ARMH $42.62 Down -0.10 -0.23%
ARM Holdings CAPS Rating: **
BRCM $51.79 Up +0.14 +0.27%
Broadcom Corp CAPS Rating: ****