This Ugly Mortgage Lending Practice Gets a Public Airing

A kerfuffle over mortgage origination statistics shows that lenders still use bias in decision-making

Jun 1, 2014 at 12:00PM


Photo: Michael Gäbler

When the Mortgage Bankers Association President David H. Stevens told an audience recently that 56% of American blacks who applied for a conventional mortgage in 2012 were denied, he set off a firestorm.

Shortly thereafter, a spokesman from Fannie Mae, the quasi-public entity that commonly purchases these types of loans, as well as Josh Rosner, an analyst from Graham Fisher & Co., repudiated the claim, saying that the analysis of Home Mortgage Disclosure Act information was incorrect. 

There is no denying, however, what Stevens labeled "an alarming trend": African Americans are consistently denied conventional mortgages at a higher rate than any other demographic, and things don't seem to be improving.

Redlining, revisited?
Discriminatory lending practices against minority borrowers are nothing new. The devastating effects on minority neighborhoods of such practices in the 1960s and 1970s – so-called "redlining" – led to the passage of the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975, as well as the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977. Years later, the housing boom seemed to bring such activities back, in force.  

It is notable that such biased lending was still taking place in 2012 – even as banks like Citizens Republic Bancorp. and Wells Fargo were in the midst of settling lawsuits speaking to their biased lending practices during the housing bubble. In those cases, banks were accused of denying conventional mortgages to black and Hispanic borrowers and signing them up instead for subprime loans – despite knowing that those applicants qualified for the safer mortgages. 

Biased practices continue
Although Stevens apparently massaged statistical numbers a bit to arrive at his high percentage of African-American mortgage denials, he needn't have bothered. The numbers are embarrassingly high without adding in, for example, manufactured housing loans, which, unless the land is part of the purchase, are not generally purchased by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac

Perusing the documents upon which the debate is based is enlightening. The raw HDMA data shows that 39.6% of loan applications from blacks were denied, compared to 24.6% for Hispanics, and 14.5% for whites. The Federal Reserve came up with somewhat different percentages, using that same statistical data. They found a 32% denial rate for blacks, 20.5% for Hispanics, and 11.6% for whites. 

Zillow took a swing at the same data, and came out with different denial percentages, as well: 25.4% for blacks, 21% for Hispanic, and 10.6% for whites. The recurring theme, however, is that African-Americans always experience a higher level of conventional mortgage denials, no matter who crunches the data. 

Not only is this type of institutionalized bias just plain wrong, but it also hurts the entire economy. Without a robust housing market, the damaged economy will continue to sputter – and, when one demographic is continually denied the opportunity to participate in that vital economic sector, everyone suffers.

Until every family that can afford to purchase a home is able to do so, the housing market will never truly recover. Unfortunately, it appears that we are not much closer to that goal than we were 50 years ago.

Take advantage of this little-known tax "loophole"
Recent tax increases have affected nearly every American taxpayer. But with the right planning, you can take steps to take control of your taxes and potentially even lower your tax bill. In our brand-new special report "The IRS Is Daring You to Make This Investment Now!," you'll learn about the simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule. Don't miss out on advice that could help you cut taxes for decades to come. Click here to learn more.

Amanda Alix has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Wells Fargo and Zillow. The Motley Fool owns shares of Wells Fargo and Zillow and has the following options: short June 2014 $50 calls on Wells Fargo and short June 2014 $48 puts on Wells Fargo. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information