When Will BP Admit It Screwed Up?

In mid-2010, the world was captivated by the Deepwater Horizon explosion and subsequent oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico. BP (NYSE: BP  ) , which was leasing the rig to drill in the region, was at the center of the firestorm. While it took months to seal the leak, BP's legal woes are far from over, as recent legal setbacks attest.

Getting it behind us
The Deepwater Horizon explosion was a disaster of unprecedented scale, claiming 11 lives and spilling massive amounts of oil. At the time, allegations of wrongdoing were rampant with BP taking blame for being too aggressive in its drilling efforts and rig owner Transocean (NYSE: RIG  ) being accused of safety lapses.

Both wanted the oil leak and explosion far behind them. That's why each agreed to big dollar payouts. Transocean, for example, agreed to pay $1.4 billion for violations of the Clean Water Act. BP, meanwhile, agreed to a $4.5 billion settlement with the government. In its haste, however, BP also agreed to a $7.8 billion settlement for civil charges.

BP Chart

BP data by YCharts

Of the two, Transocean's shares have been hardest hit. That despite a massive uptick in earnings last year, which went from a loss of over $0.60 a share in 2012 to a profit of more than $3.80 a share. That said, the disaster is the first risk factor listed in Transocean's 2013 annual report and the warnings run for several pages. Essentially, Transocean says that it may not be done paying. No wonder the drag on the shares despite the relative quiet on the legal front.

BP is still in the news, in a bad way
Shares of BP haven't been hit as hard as Transocean's but they, too, remain in the doldrums. Only, at BP the Deepwater Horizon news hasn't trickled off nearly as much. For example, the hasty deal signed on the civil side has allowed questionable damage claims to be paid.

Interestingly, the courts don't deny BP's assertion on this point. In fact, Judge Leslie Southwick noted that, "The settlement agreement does not require a claimant to submit evidence that the claim arose as a result of the oil spill." She explained that the settlement was, "not as protective of BP's present concerns as might have been achievable, but they are the protections that were accepted by the parties and approved by the district court."

(Source: US Coast Guard, via Wikimedia Commons)

In other words, BP didn't read its own fine print. And while it may seem unfair, that's what the oil giant agreed to. But what amounts to a stinging rebuke doesn't mean that BP is giving up the fight. In fact, it just lost another bid to defer payments on questionable claims. That's more legal bills eating into your earnings in a case that BP appears destined to lose because of its own decisions.

But there's good reason to fight. BP estimates that questionable claims could increase its civil outlay by nearly 20% to $9.2 billion. The $1.4 billion increase isn't chump change, even for a company that posted profits of over $23 billion last year. And the legal bills for continuing the fight will, clearly, be less than that sum.

However, the longer BP fights, the longer its name gets dragged through the mud, the longer it has to pay legal fees, and the more you have to worry about the uncertainty that still surrounds the Deepwater Horizon catastrophe. To be fair, BP and Transocean are both getting their businesses back to normal. That said, each still suffers under a cloud.

Transocean appears to be better positioned today than BP on the Deepwater Horizon front. However, this event isn't fully behind either company as BP's continued legal wrangling shows. Conservative investors are better off looking elsewhere.

An energy tax "loophole"?
You already know record oil and natural production is changing the lives of millions of Americans. But what you probably haven't heard is that the IRS is encouraging investors to support our growing energy renaissance, offering you a tax loophole to invest in some of America's greatest energy companies. Take advantage of this profitable opportunity by grabbing your brand-new special report, "The IRS Is Daring You to Make This Investment Now!," and you'll learn about the simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule. Don't miss out on advice that could help you cut taxes for decades to come. Click here to learn more.


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 08, 2014, at 3:32 PM, thomaslyoung wrote:

    Judge Southwick is a he, not she.

    BP has spent well over $1 billion on attorneys fees fighting this loosing battle.

    Finally, each day the company keeps its frivolous appeals active is another day claims can be filed. The compensation system was originally set to expire in April 2014 (over 6 weeks ago), but due to BP's ongoing appellate actions, claimants have at the very least another 6 months to seek payment. Dozens of new claims are filed each day with the average claim value exceeding $200,000.

    It would behoove BP to simply abide by its oft-stated "Commitment to the Gulf".

    http://tampa.legalexaminer.com/toxic-substances/bp-sharehold...

  • Report this Comment On June 08, 2014, at 5:44 PM, jeffbc9 wrote:

    Okay, let me put this simply:

    The central issue that could potentially go to the US Supreme Court is whether a class can include people who do not have standing to sue.

    That's it. It's not really any more, and not really any less, complicated that that.

    Why does it matter? Because if there is no class, then there is no longer a legally-enforceable settlement agreement.

    If BP wins (which it likely could), the gnashing of teeth among scumbag personal injury lawyers will be a joy to behold.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2980197, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/27/2014 12:53:16 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement