2 Ways to Play Argentina's Coming Shale Boom

The U.S. may be awash in oil and gas thanks to shale deposits and new technology, but foreign shale reserves are actually larger than America's. This article highlights the potential for a strong shale oil and gas boom in Argentina and highlights two stocks to buy (and one to avoid) as a method for investors to cash in.

Jun 16, 2014 at 1:12PM

For years now America's energy renaissance has made headlines and attracted the interest of investors, many of whom have grown rich. The scale of America's shale resources is impressive indeed:

  • Shale oil: total estimated reserves 223 billion barrels (58 billion economically recoverable today).
  • Shale gas: 2,421 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of natural gas (665 trillion recoverable).
However, those figures pale in comparison to what the Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates are available outside the US: 3.134 trillion barrels of oil, and 20,451 Tcf of natural gas. In fact, when it comes to economically recoverable shale oil reserves, Russia is No. 1 with 75 billion barrels, followed by the US, China, and Argentina respectively. When it comes to shale gas reserves, the US is No. 4 behind China (1,115 Tcf), Argentina (802 Tcf), and Algeria (707 Tcf). 
In this article I'd like to point out Argentina's potential as the world's next great oil and gas juggernaut. However, there are substantial political and economic risks involved with investing in Argentina, which is why I'd advise investors to avoid YPF (NYSE:YPF), Argentina's largest oil and gas producer, and instead cash in on this potential boom with oil service experts Baker Hughes Incorporated (NYSE:BHI)  and Schlumberger Limited (NYSE:SLB).
Risks associated with Argentinian oil and gas production
YPF, as the largest oil and gas producer in Argentina, seems like the obvious first choice when it comes to profiting from an Argentinian shale boom. And unlike the other major Latin American oil and gas producer, Petrobras, which I recently recommended against investing in, YPF has several things going in its favor. 
  • In recent years its been able to raise prices on its oil and gas.
  • Its CEO, Miguel Galuccio, is a former Schlumberger executive and appointed by Argentina's current president.
  • Revenues have been growing strongly, an average of 27% annually over the last three years.
  • It has recently signed agreements with Chevron, Baker Hughes, and Schlumberger as part of a five year, $37.2 billion investment program aimed at increasing oil production 29% and gas production 23% by 2017. 
  • It has access to the Vaca Muerta shale formation, estimated to hold 16.2 billion barrels of oil and 308 Tcf of natural gas.
  • Its operating and net margins are slightly above industry average.
Indeed, unlike the horribly mismanaged Petrobras, YPF seems to be well run -- so why not invest? One simple reason: political risk
In 2012 Argentina's government expropriated 51% of Repsol's shares in YPF. It provided no compensation (though Repsol was later able to sue the government and settled for $5 billion in Argentinian bonds).
The nationalization of YPF didn't necessarily hurt investors directly and, in fact, soon afterwards the government raised prices substantially.
However, with Argentina's inflation rate at 35%, the days of energy price increases are likely coming to an end, which means YPF's earnings growth prospects are dimming in the face of populist political pressure -- the government has already capped gas prices at $2.5/Mbtu conventional and $5.5/Mbtu shale gas. With a strong precedent set for government seizures and meddling, long-term investors should look elsewhere to cash in on this potential energy bonanza.
Why Baker Hughes and Schlumberger are better choices
There are three reasons for investing in Baker Hughes and Schlumberger instead of YPF: technology, political pull, and dividend growth opportunity.
Regarding these companies' strong political connections, consider that Argentina's president appointed a former Schlumberger executive to be president of YPF (as well as forced YPF to recruit Baker Hughes' Juan Geroby to head the company's unconventional resources division). When dealing in Latin America, political clout is a very good thing to have.
No matter who is drilling for oil and gas, drilling in shale requires the best technology, such as Schlumberger's StimMAP, Baker Hughes' Intellifrac 3D seismic mapping technology, and Baker Hughes' Logging While Drilling systems, which monitor subterranean pressures in real time. 
On top of this, analysts at S&P Capital IQ expect both Baker Hughes and Schlumberger to be very strong dividend growers over the next decade, with dividend growth rates of 16% CAGR and 12.5% CAGR respectively.  

Foolish takaway
When it comes to investing in foreign oil and gas production, the direct route, (foreign oil and gas producers) can be fraught with excess dangers and risks that long-term investors need not expose themselves to. So called "pick and shovel" providers (oil services companies), are a much better risk-adjusted method for cashing in on the potential shale boom.
Baker Hughes and Schlumberger not only have the business and political connections to operate in the Byzantine world of foreign boardrooms and oil and gas exploration, but also offer great dividend growth opportunities.

OPEC is absolutely terrified of this game-changer
Imagine a company that rents a very specific and valuable piece of machinery for $41,000 per hour (That's almost as much as the average American makes in a year!). And Warren Buffett is so confident in this company's can't-live-without-it business model, he just loaded up on 8.8 million shares. An exclusive, brand-new Motley Fool report reveals the company we're calling OPEC's Worst Nightmare. Just click HERE to uncover the name of this industry-leading stock... and join Buffett in his quest for a veritable landslide of profits!


Adam Galas has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information