Is Executive Pay Out of Control? Meet 4 CEOs Whose Pay Went Up More Than 1,000%

We all know there is a lot of volatility in CEO pay, but increases of more than 1,000% are still pretty rare. These four companies: Zulily, LinkedIn, Splunk and Och-Ziff show how it's done. Themes? IPOs and founder CEOs.

Jun 16, 2014 at 1:35PM

Five CEOs had increases in pay of more than 1,000% this past year, according to the Equilar/New York Times pay study of the 200 highest-paid CEOs. I've already written about the TransDigm Group's Nicholas Howley, who received an increase of 1,842%, here. Howley was ranked third. The other CEOs, in order, were Darrell Cavens of zulily (NASDAQ:ZU), Jeffrey Weiner of LinkedIn (NYSE:LNKD), Godfrey Sullivan of Splunk (NASDAQ:SPLK), and Daniel Och of Och-Ziff Capital Management (NYSE:OZM). Data is taken from the Equilar survey, the analysis is my own.

CEO pay does not behave like pay for you and me. It is often volatile, with large increases and decreases, because so much of it -- typically 80% to 90% -- is dependent on performance and stock price. And we all know how volatile stock prices can be.

In addition, while most CEOs receive a standard pay package every year -- salary, cash bonus, equity in some form, benefits -- some do not. Some CEOs do not get a stock award every year, or are not always eligible for a bonus, while others decide to take $1 in salary, instead of $1 million. Taking into account that potentially 90% of your pay will disappear one year only to reappear the next, extreme volatility is practically built in to executive pay. So perhaps it's not so surprising that CEOs experience increases of up to 9,000%. Next year, it will go down 9,000% and a new crop of CEOs will receive this year's round of 1,000% increases. The four examples below demonstrate this phenomenon clearly.

Quarter of a billion in option profits

First is online retailer Zulily. Co-founder Cavens' increase -- of 9,318% -- is a simple tale of stock option awards. In 2012, he was paid a salary of $250,000 and a modest bonus of $40,000. In 2013, this was supplemented with a stock option award valued at almost $27 million. It consisted of almost 4 million stock options awarded at a strike price of $10.28.

When the company floated in November last year, the IPO price was $22, so these options had an immediate notional profit of around $47 million. When the stock price hit a high of $72.75, the options were worth almost a quarter of a billion dollars. Prices have since dropped back to the immediate post-IPO price of around $37, meaning the option is still worth over $100 million. Of course, being a co-founder, Cavens already owns 21,000 shares of the supervoting B class shares (worth 10 votes per share), or roughly a fifth of the company, so the purpose of the options in aligning his interests with shareholders might be questioned. We will see next year, if such an award is repeated.

First equity awards since IPO

LinkedIn's first equity awards since its IPO led to the 4,075% increase for Weiner. A combined $47.4 million in stock and options raised his pay from $1.2 million in 2012 to just over $49 million in 2013. While the IPO options with a strike price of $2.32 are still in-the-money (the strike price is lower than the market price), the options awarded last year were priced at $170.46. LinkedIn hasn't seen that kind of stock value since the middle of April, and the stock is well down from its $253 high in September last year. So these options are currently out-of-the money, or underwater, and therefore worthless.

The restricted stock, on the other hand, is still worth almost $18 million, despite the decline in stock price; not the most effective of performance-related pay vehicles.

Another IPO increase

Software company Splunk saw CEO Godfrey Sullivan's pay go up 1,818%. Again, following an IPO, Sullivan's pay went from less than $1 million to over $17 million as a result of a $16 million restricted stock unit award. The increase would never have happened, however, had Splunk not delayed its 2013 RSU award until the 2014 fiscal year (the fiscal year runs from Feb. 1 to Jan. 31). Thus 2013 pay had no RSUs and 2014 had two awards.

In either case, a preliminary surge in stock price from an IPO of $36 to a 12-month high of $92.75 failed to be maintained and the stock is now at $45.75. But, of course, the RSUs are still worth $12.8 million, despite the decline in stock price since they were awarded.

Partnership units at Och-Ziff

Asset management firm Och-Ziff's founder CEO Daniel Och saw his pay rise by 1,637%. In the most unusual case so far, basically these "stock awards," with an estimated value of $21 million, represent partnership units that were redistributed among the managing directors of the firm after a departing MD forfeited their ownership. This seems to happen relatively regularly, since Och received $10.5 million of them in 2011 also. On the other hand, the ownership of partnership units does not appear to be reduced when new partners are taken on.

Och's pay was dwarfed, however, by that of James Levin, head of global credit at the firm, who received almost $119 million in "stock awards." These were made up partly of redistributed partnership units, partly some RSUs based on his performance in 2012, and mostly on the conversion of 12 million D units into A units based on the firm's performance.

Timing is everything

As can be seen by the analysis of these extreme pay movements, timing is everything. Did an MD leave the firm this year? Was a stock award delayed? Were the stock options awarded pre-IPO or post? In addition, however, form is very influential. Stock options can lose their value completely, as in the case at LinkedIn, where the current market price has fallen below the stock price. Restricted stock -- as long as the company remains solvent -- always has value, whether the stock price goes up or down. As a shareholder, it might seem that restricted stock is more akin to your experience ... except that you actually paid for your stock.

Will this stock be your next multi-bagger?
Give us five minutes and we'll show how you could own the best stock for 2014. Every year, The Motley Fool's chief investment officer hand-picks one stock with outstanding potential. But it's not just any run-of-the-mill company. It's a stock perfectly positioned to cash in on one of the upcoming year's most lucrative trends. Last year his pick skyrocketed 134%. And previous top picks have gained upwards of 908%, 1,252% and 1,303% over the subsequent years! Believe me, you don't want to miss what could be his biggest winner yet! Just click here to download your free copy of "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2014" today.

Paul Hodgson has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends LinkedIn and Splunk. The Motley Fool owns shares of LinkedIn. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information