Orbitz Worldwide: Behind the Curve?

The online travel industry is so competitive that companies must relentlessly innovate in order to stay ahead, which could lead to an investment opportunity. Is Orbitz one of those companies?

Jun 16, 2014 at 4:49PM


Orbitz Worldwide (NYSE:OWW) has outperformed its peers in terms of stock appreciation over the past three years. While Orbitz's share price has appreciated 228.2% over this time-frame, The Priceline Group (NASDAQ:PCLN) and Expedia (NASDAQ:EXPE) have "only" appreciated 146.3% and 211.1%, respectively. This performance might sway some investors, but Foolish investing is about focusing on what's really going on behind the scenes and setting yourself up for the long haul.

Several concerns for Orbitz
In its 10-Q, Orbitz cited several headwinds that could impact its performance. One of these concerns was a relatively high unemployment rate, which would lead to reduced consumer spending. This, in turn, would lead to volatility in the online travel market. The overall perception of the sustainability of the global economy also played a role.

Another big concern is that airlines and hotels are now focusing on distributing their products through their own sites. Expedia also mentioned this on its 10-Q, and Expedia went even further by stating that airlines and hotels are doing this by offering promotions to travelers. But this is only the beginning.

Lagging in metasearch
One big difference between Orbitz and Expedia/Priceline is that Orbitz is behind in metasearch (aggregating search engine and database information so travelers can find the best deals in one place.) After Kayak had a five-year relationship with Expedia, Priceline bought Kayak. Fortunately for Orbitz, it now has access to the metasearch market via TripAdvisor. That's the good news. The bad news is that this isn't an exclusive deal like it had with Kayak. 

Priceline acquired Kayak and Expedia acquired majority ownership in Trivago, and both Kayak and Trivago are metasearch sites. Another potentially ominous sign for Orbitz, as well as its peers, is that Google is becoming increasingly interested in the travel market. 

Increased competition and industry trends
Another factor for Orbitz is that the likelihood of increased competition in the online travel industry will lead to increased marketing spend so it can remain competitive. This primarily relates to the cost to acquire search engine keywords in order to then increase traffic.

Furthermore, Orbitz is behind the curve with another industry trend. Expedia is now offering travelers the option to pay while they book their hotels or upon arrival. This will increase costs for Expedia, but the company feels that it's a necessary risk. Orbitz likely doesn't want to absorb those costs -- credit card fees for hotel bookings and customer service. 

Getting back to air travel, recent mergers have negatively affected online travel companies because they have resulted in reduced capacity. It should also be noted that while higher airfares have helped the online travel market, this is primarily thanks to corporate travel. Historically, leisure travelers don't respond well to higher airfares, and leisure travelers are more important than business travelers to online travel companies.

As if Orbitz doesn't have enough headaches, its suppliers are constantly looking to decrease distribution costs (commissions paid to online travel companies), which could significantly reduce the company's net revenue. This pressure is expected to continue, but Orbitz is confident that its shift toward hotels and dynamic packaging will lead to positive long-term fiscal results. Speaking of fiscal results, let's get to some good news for Orbitz. Yes ... there's actually good news. 

Recent results
Below is a quick glance at gross bookings for Orbitz in the first quarter year over year (bookings pertain to funds expected to be received from customers based on accepted orders or contracts): 


Gross Bookings


Up 3%


Up 2%


Up 4%

The domestic performance was due to higher fees and lower volume, whereas the international performance resulted from higher values and volume (excluding air volume) Overall, these are positive numbers. 

Now take a quick look at revenue (year over year):


Net Revenue


Up 4%


Up 1%


Up 7%

Vacation Packages

Up 4%

Advertising and Media

Up 12%

Orbitz has managed to deliver despite increased competition and more demands from suppliers in regards to decreased distribution costs. However, consider another type of chart before you make any investment decisions. The chart below compares the top-line performances of Orbitz, Priceline, and Expedia over the past five years:

EXPE Revenue (TTM) Chart

EXPE Revenue (TTM) data by YCharts

If you look at the chart above and combine that with the fact that Orbitz is trading at 67 times earnings whereas Priceline and Expedia trade at 33 and 32 times earnings, respectively, then you would be hard-pressed to find a strong argument for Orbitz over its peers. 

The Foolish bottom line
Orbitz appears to be a good company, but it's behind the curve in several areas, it's in a sensitive industry, and it's not the best of breed. If you're going to invest in an online travel company, then you might want to consider Priceline first. But keep in mind that this entire industry is volatile. 

Want less volatility and more wealth? 
The smartest investors know that dividend stocks simply crush their non-dividend paying counterparts over the long term. That's beyond dispute. They also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily, while still allowing you to sleep like a baby. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor's portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.

Dan Moskowitz has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Google (C shares), Priceline Group, and TripAdvisor. The Motley Fool owns shares of Google (C shares) and Priceline Group. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

A Financial Plan on an Index Card

Keeping it simple.

Aug 7, 2015 at 11:26AM

Two years ago, University of Chicago professor Harold Pollack wrote his entire financial plan on an index card.

It blew up. People loved the idea. Financial advice is often intentionally complicated. Obscurity lets advisors charge higher fees. But the most important parts are painfully simple. Here's how Pollack put it:

The card came out of chat I had regarding what I view as the financial industry's basic dilemma: The best investment advice fits on an index card. A commenter asked for the actual index card. Although I was originally speaking in metaphor, I grabbed a pen and one of my daughter's note cards, scribbled this out in maybe three minutes, snapped a picture with my iPhone, and the rest was history.

More advisors and investors caught onto the idea and started writing their own financial plans on a single index card.

I love the exercise, because it makes you think about what's important and forces you to be succinct.

So, here's my index-card financial plan:


Everything else is details. 

Something big just happened

I don't know about you, but I always pay attention when one of the best growth investors in the world gives me a stock tip. Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner (whose growth-stock newsletter was rated #1 in the world by The Wall Street Journal)* and his brother, Motley Fool CEO Tom Gardner, just revealed two brand new stock recommendations moments ago. Together, they've tripled the stock market's return over 12+ years. And while timing isn't everything, the history of Tom and David's stock picks shows that it pays to get in early on their ideas.

Click here to be among the first people to hear about David and Tom's newest stock recommendations.

*"Look Who's on Top Now" appeared in The Wall Street Journal which references Hulbert's rankings of the best performing stock picking newsletters over a 5-year period from 2008-2013.

Compare Brokers