Did Ford Motor Company's Hybrids Get Clobbered By a Computer Error?

An embarrassing error in calculating fuel-economy ratings suddenly leaves Ford’s green cars at a competitive disadvantage.

Jun 17, 2014 at 12:31PM


The Lincoln MKZ Hybrid has sold surprisingly well, thanks to fuel-economy ratings that beat those of a rival Lexus. But that advantage is now gone. Will sales fall sharply? Source: Ford Motor Co.

Ford (NYSE:F) said last week that it is lowering the fuel-economy ratings for the 2014 Fiesta and all of its hybrids, due to an error in its testing process. 

CEO Alan Mulally said in a statement that the company is apologizing to its customers and will provide "goodwill payments" to owners of the cars affected. 

But this is a big embarrassment for Ford, which has pushed hard to compete with Toyota (NYSE:TM) as a maker of fuel-efficient and hybrid vehicles. And it leaves some of Ford's greenest models suddenly looking a lot less green.

What happened here? And how is it likely to affect Ford's sales?

An error in a computer model led to some very optimistic ratings
As Ford explained it, there was an error in the engineering model that translates the company's test results into a fuel-economy rating. In other words, the formulas in Ford's engineering software didn't quite match up with the real world -- something that Ford discovered when doing real-world testing of the Fusion Hybrid.

Ford said that it has fixed the errors, retested the affected vehicles, and has improved the "validation tests" it uses to make sure its computer models accurately reflect what goes on with its vehicles. Ford also said that it had notified the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency of the errors, and the EPA said that it conducted its own independent tests to verify Ford's new ratings. 


Sales of Ford's C-Max Hybrid fell sharply after its fuel-economy ratings were cut last year. Source: Ford Motor Co.

This incident follows another, last August, in which Ford cut its fuel-economy ratings for the C-Max Hybrid by up to seven miles per gallon after a raft of complaints from consumers who weren't getting anywhere near the fuel-economy that Ford had been touting. 

This cut is a much bigger deal, though. The affected models include the hybrid and plug-in versions of the 2013 and 2014 Ford C-Max and Ford Fusion, the 2013 and 2014 Lincoln MKZ Hybrid, and one non-hybrid, the 2014 Ford Fiesta. 

Ford says that it has sold or leased about 200,000 of the vehicles affected by the changes; owners will receive a "goodwill" payment ranging from $125 to $1,050.

This is bad for Ford, right?
Well, it's not good. 

The payments and embarrassing press coverage won't help Ford any. But the impact on sales of its hybrids could end up hurting a lot worse.

Before they were cut last August, Ford's ads for the C-Max made a lot of hay out of the fact that its fuel-economy ratings beat those of its chief competitor, Toyota's big Prius V. But that advantage is now gone: The C-Max is now rated at 42 miles per gallon in the city and 37 on the highway, 40 combined; the Prius V gets 44 city and 40 highway, 42 combined. 

That change clobbered Ford's sales of the C-Max Hybrid. In the six months before the cut (February through July of last year), Ford sold 17,738 C-Max Hybrids; in the six months following (September 2013 through February 2014), Ford sold just 7,768.

Will Ford's other hybrids -- including the strong-selling Fusion Hybrid -- now suffer a similar fate? 


The EPA combined mileage rating on Ford's Fusion Hybrid has gone from 47 to 42 miles per gallon. Source: Ford Motor Co.

They might. The changes are pretty dramatic. The Fusion Hybrid goes from 47 mpg city, 47 highway, and 47 combined to a much more mundane 44 city, 41 highway, and 42 combined. The MKZ Hybrid fares even worse: Its combined mileage drops from 45 to 38, below the 40 mpg combined rating boasted by its key rival, the Lexus ES 300h -- another Toyota product.

A whole lot of Ford (and Lincoln) ads just became obsolete -- and with them, a lot of the arguments for these cars over the competition.

Ford isn't the only one, and it won't be the last
Ford isn't the only automaker to have suffered this embarrassment. Hyundai (NASDAQOTH:HYMTF) and Kia (NASDAQOTH:KIMTF) both had to restate fuel-economy claims back in 2012. And most experts agree that this won't be the last time, either.

The problem stems from the way fuel-economy ratings are calculated nowadays. The EPA doesn't test cars and assign a rating; instead, it publishes standards that the automakers use to measure their cars, with a combination of real-world testing and sophisticated computer modeling.

That would seem to leave a lot of room for cheating -- but the EPA does listen to consumer complaints and check automakers' ratings from time to time. 

Nobody is suggesting that Ford cheated here. But the procedure also leaves a lot of room for bugs in the computer models -- bugs that can lead to great-looking numbers at first, but a lot of embarrassment later on.

Will it also lead to lost sales for Ford? We'll find out.

Top dividend stocks for the next decade
Automakers like Ford aren't hot growth stocks, but Ford investors do quite well -- thanks to the company's solid dividends. The smartest investors know that dividend stocks simply crush their non-dividend-paying counterparts over the long term. They also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily over time -- while allowing you to sleep comfortably at night. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor's portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now

John Rosevear owns shares of Ford. The Motley Fool recommends Ford. The Motley Fool owns shares of Ford. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information