What Does Dish Networks’s Spectrum Mean for Verizon Communications & AT&T Inc.?

If Verizon acquires Dish Network's spectrum, what does it mean for both companies and AT&T?

Jun 24, 2014 at 2:00PM

AT&T's (NYSE:T) acquisition of DirecTV (NASDAQ:DTV) was bit of a head scratcher due to Dish Network (NASDAQ:DISH) being considered a much more attractive target due to its enormous spectrum. A recent report suggests that Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE:VZ) agrees with this notion, which could cause several effects for shareholders.

Where's the spectrum?
AT&T's near $50 billion acquisition of DirecTV significantly boosts its presence in the television space. DirecTV has 20 million U.S. and 18 million Latin American subscribers, which will add to U-verse's 10.7 million users and give AT&T a great deal of leverage in this space.

Apparently, AT&T is trying to build on a U-verse segment that's growing at 25% annually and now accounts for 10% of the company's total revenue. However, analysts have been quick to notice that DirecTV lacks any spectrum assets, which is a key component in dictating just about all merger and acquisition moves of large telecom companies.

What is spectrum?
Spectrum is important because it allows for the free flow of data, and with newer smartphones needing more data and consumers using these devices more often, such flow is important. Essentially, data can be compared to vehicles and spectrum an interstate. When too many vehicles crowd an interstate, the flow of traffic begins to slow. However, if that interstate is widened or alternative routes are created, those vehicles can flow at a faster pace.

This example is a good illustration of why spectrum is important for telecom companies, explaining why most large acquisitions involve large spectrum assets. For AT&T to spend near $50 billion and not gain new spectrum, it has created a lot of questions. 

Will Verizon get even stronger?
With that said, Verizon is clearly AT&T's largest competitor, and just recently spent more than $100 billion to take full ownership of its wireless business. Verizon now has more leverage in the wireless business, which could explain why AT&T felt the need to purchase DirecTV as a hedge. News has since surfaced from the New York Post that Verizon is very interested in acquiring Dish Network's spectrum.

Reportedly, early talks have already begun for Verizon to purchase the assets in what could be a great deal for both companies. Dish owns a spectrum valued at more than $20 billion that it worked aimlessly to get approved by the FCC for mobile use.

Is this good for Dish?
Spectrum is separated by high and low frequency, with the former being great in urban areas with a higher density of usage. Seeing as how the majority of data is used in more densely populated areas, this would be a big win for Verizon. Also, since Dish Network failed to acquire or partner with any of the national telecom companies, it would allow it to create value on an asset that is currently unused in the mobile space.

Moreover, Dish has been very aggressive in a low interest rate environment, and has total debt of more than $13.5 billion with $4.6 billion being current liabilities. This has allowed the company to strike significant content deals, grow throughout the U.S., improve its technology, and become more competitive against DirecTV.

However, with AT&T now owning DirecTV, Dish doesn't have the leverage on its balance sheet to make those same investments twice. As a result, a $20 billion spectrum would pay off all debt and add to its near $9 billion cash position. Not to mention, Dish could focus solely on growing in its core business, all of which is good for shareholders.

Foolish thoughts
As for Verizon, the full stake of its wireless business, combined with highly valuable spectrum, could be too much for AT&T to handle. Verizon's 4G LTE network is already the nation's largest, covering 97% of Americans, and would allow it to improve the speed in markets that are most valuable and crowded. All in all, Verizon acquiring Dish's spectrum looks like a win for both companies, and perhaps a loss for AT&T's wireless business.

Your cable company is scared, but you can get rich
You know cable's going away. But do you know how to profit? There's $2.2 trillion out there to be had. Currently, cable grabs a big piece of it. That won't last. And when cable falters, three companies are poised to benefit. Click here for their names. Hint: They're not Netflix, Google, and Apple. 


Brian Nichols owns shares of Verizon Communications. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information